不同学业成就中学生创造性思维的差异研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用创造力量表对990名不同学业成就中学生的创造性思维进行研究,结果发现:(1)高学业成就组中学生的创造性思维、发散思维和聚合思维显著高于低学业成就组.(2)高低学业成就组中学生创造性思维、发散思维和聚合思维表现出年级差异性.(3)高低学业成就组中学生的创造性思维都随着年级发展而上升,但是两组的高峰期却出现差异,高学业成就组创造力高峰出现在初二和高二,而低学业成就组出现在高一.(4)发散思维的发展趋势上,高学业成就组呈现出曲折上升的趋势,而低学业成就组整体的发展趋势平稳.(5)高低学业成就组中学生聚合思维的发展趋势相似,都呈现出在初中阶段上升到高中阶段趋于稳定,并且在高中阶段两组的水平接近.

关键词: 创造性思维, 学业成就, 中学生, 发散思维, 聚合思维

Abstract: This study focused on the creative thinking of 990 students with different academic achievements, the results indicate:(1) students with high academic achievement are higher than the low in creative thinking, divergent thinking and convergent thinking;(2) there are significant grade differences in creative thinking, divergent thinking and convergent thinking of high and low academic achievement students;(3) creative thinking is increased with the increased grades;creativity thinking of the high academic achievement students is peaked at grade 2 in junior high school and senior high school, but that of the low academic achievement group is peaked at grade 1 in senior high school;(4) the divergent thinking of students with high academic achievement tends to be increased with the increased grades;(5) convergent thinking of the two groups has a similar tendency, increased in middle school, and stabilized in high school.

Key words: creative thinking, academic achievement, adolescent, divergent thinking, convergent thinking

中图分类号:

B844.2

沃建中, 王福兴, 林崇德, 刘彩梅. 不同学业成就中学生创造性思维的差异研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 29-35.

WO Jian-zhong, WANG Fu-xing, LIN Chong-de, LIU Cai-mei. A Research on High and Low Academic Achievement Adolescents’ Creativity[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(2): 29-35.

参考文献

[1] Torrance E P.Torrance tests of creative thinking:Directions manual and scoring guide.Bensenville,IL:Scholastic Testing Service,1974.
[2] Cropley A.In Praise of Convergent Thinking.Creativity Research Journal,2006,18(3):391-404.
[3] 徐展,张庆林,Sternberg R J.创造性智力的验证性因素分析.心理科学,2004,27(5):1103-1106.
[4] Sternberg R J,Lubart T I.Investing in creativity.American Psychologist,1996,51(7):677-688.
[5] Bunco M.Creativity.Annual Review of Psychology,2004,55:657-687.
[6] Powers D E,Kaufman J C.Do standardized tests penalize deepthinking,creative,orconscientious students? Some personality correlates of Graduate Record Examination test score.Intelligence,2004,32(2):145-153
[7] Kobal D,Musek J.Self-concept and academic achievement:Slovenia and France.Personality and Individual Differences,2001,30(5):887-899.
[8] Chamorro-Premuzic T.Creativity Versus Conscientiousness:Which is a Better Predictor of Student Performance?.Applied Cognitive Psychology,2006,20(4):521-531.
[9] Runco M A.Creativity,extracurricular activity and divergent thinking as predictors of mathematics and science performance by talented adolescents.ERIC Document Reproduction Service,1987,279-523.
[10] Koke L C,Vernon P A.The Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test(STAT) as a measure of academic achievement and general intelligence.Personality and Individual Differences,2003,35(8):1803-1807.
[11] 郑日昌,肖蓓苓.对中学生创造力的测验研究.心理学报,1983.4:446-451.
[12] 童秀英,沃建中.高中生创造性思维发展特点的研究.心理发展与教育,2002,18(2):22-26.
[13] King L A,Walker L M,Broyles S J.Creativity and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of Research in Personality,1996,30:189-203.
[14] Digman J M.Personality structure:emergence of the Five Factor Model.Annual Review of Psychology,1990,41:417-440.
[15] Busato V V,Prins F J,Elshout J J,et al.Intellectual ability,learning style,personality,achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education.Personality and Individual Differences,2000,29(6):1057-1068.
[16] Chamorro-Premuzic T,Furnham A.Personality predicts academic performance:evidence from two longitudinal studies on British University students.Journal of Research in Personality,2003,37:319-338.
[17] Domino G.Assessment of creativity with the ACL:An empirical comparison of four scales.Creativity Research Journal,1994,7:21-33.
[18] Clapham M M.The convergent validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories.Educational and Psychological Measurement,2004,64(5):828-841.
[19] 胡卫平,Philip Adey,申继亮等.中英青少年科学创造力发展的比较(In English).心理学报,2004,36(6):718-731.
[20] 罗晓路.大学生创造力特点的研究.心理科学,2006,29(1):168-172.
[21] 董奇.儿童创造力发展心理.杭州:浙江教育出版社,1993,198-200,93-94.
[22] Claxton A F,Pannells T C,Rhoads P A.Developmental Trends in the Creativity of School-Age Children.Creativity Research Journal,2005,17(4):327-335.
[23] 林崇德.发展心理学.第1版.北京:人民教育出版社,1995.358-385.

相关文章 15

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[4]	李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[5]	李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[6]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[7]	王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[8]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[9]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[10]	程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[11]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[12]	彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[13]	张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持？来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[14]	张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗？——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 54-66.
[15]	李大林, 黄梅, 陈维, 吴文峰. 生活事件对初中生抑郁的影响:自尊和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 352-359.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed