小学3~5年级学习不良儿童社会比较的特点

心理发展与教育 ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 36-39.

小学3~5年级学习不良儿童社会比较的特点

邢淑芬¹, 林崇德¹, 俞国良²

1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
2. 中国人民大学心理学系, 北京, 100872

出版日期:2006-04-15 发布日期:2006-04-15
通讯作者: 林崇德,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.通讯作者:E-mail:linchongde@263.com E-mail:linchongde@263.com

A Study on the Characteristics of Social Comparison Among Children With Learning Disabilities

XING Shu-fen¹, LIN Chong-de¹, YU Guo-liang²

1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Institute of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Online:2006-04-15 Published:2006-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以小学三、四、五年级95名儿童为被试,采用访谈法探讨了小学学习不良儿童的社会比较特点。结果表明:70%学习不良儿童自发地进行上行比较,即群体外比较,其动机为自我提升;学习不良儿童的社会比较和时间比较的频率均低于一般儿童;学习不良儿童的社会比较目标水平显著低于一般儿童,随着年级的升高其目标水平呈不断下降的发展趋势。

关键词: 社会比较, 学习不良, 儿童

Abstract: The present study examined the characteristics of social comparison of children with LD with 95 children of pri 2 mary school from grade 3～5,applying the method of interview.The results showed that:(1)seventy percent of children with LD spontaneously compared the academic performance with that of their normally achieving children,which was out-group comparison,their motive was self-improvement;only six percent of children with LD compared their academic performance with that of their poorer achieving peers,their motive was self-enhancement;(2)the frequency of social comparison and temporal comparison of children with LD was significantly lower than that of normal children,which indicated that the children with LD not only avoided social comparison,but neglected the temporal comparison;(3)the target level of social comparison of children with LD was significantly lower than that of normal children,and the target level of social comparison of children with LD declined from grade 3～5,showing that the higher grade,the stronger self-protection.

Key words: social comparison, learning disabilities, children

中图分类号:

B844.2

邢淑芬, 林崇德, 俞国良. 小学3~5年级学习不良儿童社会比较的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 36-39.

XING Shu-fen, LIN Chong-de, YU Guo-liang. A Study on the Characteristics of Social Comparison Among Children With Learning Disabilities[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(2): 36-39.

参考文献

[1] Suls J M,Miller R L.Social Comparison process:Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.Washington,DC:Hemisphere Publication Services,1977:1-19.
[2] Renick M J,Harter S.Impact of Social Comparisons on the Developing Self-Perceptions of Learning Disabled Students.Journal of Educational Psychology,1989,81:631-638.
[3] Alison O M.Evaluating Self-Concept Interventions from a Multidimensional Perspective:A Meta-Analysis.
[4] Crabtree J,Rutland A.Self-evaluation and Social Comparison Amongst Adolescents with Learning Difficulties Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,2001,(2):347-359.
[5] Klein M P,Blier H K,Janze A M.Maintaining Positive Self-Evaluations:Reducing Attention to Diagnostic but Unfavorable Social Comparison Information When General Self-Regard is Salient.Motivation and Emotion,2001,25:23-40.
[6] Gibbons F X,Benow C P,Gerrard M.From Top Dog to Bottom Half:Social Comparison Strategies in Response to Poor Performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:638-652.
[7] Finlay W M L,Lyons E.Social categorizations,social comparisons and stigma:Presentations of self in people with learning disabilities.British Journal of Social Psychology,2000,9:129-146.
[8] 辛自强,俞国良.学习不良的界定与操作化定义.心理学动态,1999,2:52-57.
[9] Wheeler L,Miyake K.Social Comparison in Everyday Life.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,62(5):760-773.
[10] Suls J M,Wheeler L.Handbook of social comparison:Theory and research.New York:Plenum press,2000:123-141.
[11] Collins R L.For better or worse:The impact of upward social comparisons on self-evaluations.Psychological Bulletin,1996,119(1):51-69.
[12] Blanton H,Buunk B P,Gibbons F X,Kuper H.When Better-Than-Others Compare Upward:Choice of Comparison and Comparative Evaluation as Independent Predictors of Academic Performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,76(2),420-430.
[13] Tesser A,Millar M,Moore J.Some Affective Consequences of Social Comparison and Reflection Process:The Pain and Pleasure of Being Close.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,54(1):49-61.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed