心理发展与教育 ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 30-36.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

失望情境下小学儿童情绪表达规则的运用

张丽, 辛自强   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2004-10-15 发布日期:2004-10-15
  • 作者简介:辛自强(1975- ),女,山东人,北京师范大学发展心理研究所讲师,博士.E-mail:xinziqiang@shou.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育科学"十五"规划重点课题(ACA03032).

The Application of Children’s Display in a Disappointing Situation

ZHANG Li, XIN Zi-qiang   

  1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, China 100875
  • Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

摘要: 以91名小学一、三、五年级儿童为被试,采用故事访谈法探讨了失望情境下儿童情绪表达规则运用的发展特点及其影响因素。结果表明:(1)从一年级到五年级,小学儿童在失望情景下的真实情绪和表面情绪都变得越来越积极,且失望情境下无论是在真实情绪上还是在表面情绪上,都没有表现出显著的性别差异;(2)三种人际关系类型下儿童的表面情绪和真实情绪都表现出极大的差异,而且人际关系类型不同儿童使用表达规则的情况也有很大不同,这可以用儿童情绪调节策略的不同来解释;(3)失望情境下,儿童情绪表达规则的使用受到不同人际类型的影响,这可能与儿童对情绪表达社会影响的不同预期有关;(4)儿童的情绪表达目标不受其所处的人际关系类型影响,且不同人际关系下儿童的情绪表达目标不受其年级、性别的影响。

关键词: 情绪表达规则, 失望情境, 小学儿童

Abstract: With 91 children of primary school from grade 1、3、5 as subjects,applying the method of story-interviewing the present study explored the development of the application of children's display rule and its influential factors in a disappointing situation.The result showed:(1)Children's real emotion and apparent emotion showed an increasingly positive trend from grade1 to grade 5,and in a disappointing situation,both in real emotion and apparent emotion,girls and boys didn't show significant difference;(2)In three kinds of interpersonal relations,there were extreme difference between children's apparent and real emotion,and for different interpersonal relation,the use of display rule were different,which could be attributed to the difference of children's regulation strategies;(3)In a disappointing situation the use of children's display rule was subjected to different interpersonal types,which could be related to children's different expectation of the social influence to their emotion expression.(4)Children's emotional display objective was not subjected to interpersonal types,and in different kinds of interpersonal relations children's emotional display objective was not dependent on their grade and sex.

Key words: emotional display rule, disappointing situation, children of primary school

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Ekman P L, Friesen W V. Unmasking the face. Englewlood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
[2] Harris P. Children and emotion: the development of psychological understanding. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989,138.
[3] Gosselin P, Warren M, Diotte M. Motivation to hide emotion and children's understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotions. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2002, 163(4): 479-496.
[4] Josephs I E. Display Rule Behavior and Understanding in Preschool Children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1994, 18(4): 301-314.
[5] Saami C. Children's understanding of display rules for expressive behavior. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15: 424-429.
[6] Zeman J, Garber J. Display Rules for Anger, Sadness, and Pain: It Depends on Who Is Watching. Child Development, 1996, 67(3): 957-973.
[7] Harris P L, Donnelly K, Guz G R, Pitt-Watson R. Children's Understanding of the Distinction between Real and Apparent Emotion,Child Development, 1986, 57:895-909.
[8] Saarni C. An observational study of children's attempt to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 1984, 5:1504-1513.
[9] Cole F M. Children's spontaneous control of facial expression.Child Development, 1986, 57: 1309-1321.
[10] Davis T. Gender differences in masking negative emotions:Ability of motivation? Development Psychology, 31 : 660-667.
[11] Underwood M K, Coie J D, Herbsman C R. Display rules for anger and aggression in sehool-age children. Child Development, 1992,63, 366-380.
[12] Pamela W G. The Relations of Emotional Role Taking, Affective/Moral Attributions, and Emotional Display Rule Knowledge to LowIncome School-Age Children's Social Competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1996,17: 19-36.
[13] Saarni C. The Development of Emotional Competence. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999,197-199.
[14] Saami C. The Development of Emotional Competence. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999, 209.
[15] Gross J J. Antecedent-and-response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74:224-237.
[16] Gross J J. Emotion regulation: sffective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 2002, 39: 281-291.
[17] Jones D C, Abbey B B, Cumberland A. The development of display rule knowledge: Linkages with family expressiveness and social competence. Child Development. 1998, 69(4): 1209-1222.
[18] Bennett M, Knight M. Children's understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotion. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1996, 157(3): 267-274.
[1] 薛笑然, 黄碧娟, 李红霞, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童数学态度与数学成就的纵向联系:学业拖延和数学元认知的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 520-529.
[2] 王振宏, 彭源, 赵一萌. 父母婚姻质量与儿童内化问题:父母情绪表达的中介作用与儿童迷走神经活动的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 121-128.
[3] 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
[4] 郝嘉佳, 陈英和. 小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 641-647.
[5] 谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 郝恩河, 王亚丽. 状态与特质之分:来自社会创造性的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 483-490.
[6] 李庆功, 周小梅, 徐芬. 好友可信度与9~12岁儿童信任的关系及其发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 232-237.
[7] 王昱文, 王振宏, 刘建君. 小学儿童自我意识情绪理解发展及其与亲社会行为、同伴接纳的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 65-70.
[8] 陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 颜色、形状和大小相似性与变化性对儿童归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 17-24.
[9] 陈庆飞, 雷怡, 李红. 前提项目间差异对儿童归纳推理多样性效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 457-464.
[10] 李燕芳, 王莹, 郑渝萍, 董奇. 小学儿童英语课堂学习焦虑发展及其与教师教育行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 42-47.
[11] 李燕芳, 管益杰, 楼春芳, 董奇. 小学汉语儿童英语口语产出形式的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 26-31,38.
[12] 谷传华, 周宗奎, 种明慧. 小学儿童社会创造性与其同伴关系、学业成绩的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 20-25.
[13] 谷传华, 周宗奎. 小学儿童社会创造性倾向与父母养育方式的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 34-38.
[14] 张春妹, 邹泓, 侯珂. 小学儿童尊重行为与人格、班级环境的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 16-22.
[15] 肖浩宇, 张庆林, 史慧颖. 小学儿童提问能力的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 58-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!