工读学生与普通学生对责任判断的比较研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用内隐联想测验对40名工读学生与普通学生的责任判断进行比较研究,结果表明:工读学生比普通学生辨别攻击词以及与"责任在他"有关的短语的反应时短;工读学生辨别与"责任在他"有关的短语的速度比辨别与"责任在我"有关的短语的速度快,而普通学生辨别与"责任在他"有关的短语的速度比辨别与"责任在我"有关的短语的速度要慢;工读学生在"责任在他—攻击,责任在我-不攻击"的联合辨别反应时上比普通学生短。这些反应时的差异反映了工读学生存在着敌意归因与对攻击信念的内隐联想。

关键词: 责任归因, 内隐联想, 攻击行为, 工读性

Abstract: 40 training students and general students have been tested by Implicit Association Test to study their different liability judgment.The results indicate:the respond time of training students in recognizing aggressive words and relevant phrases about "liability lies on others" is shorter than that of general students; training students respond quicker on phrases about "liability lies on others" than on those phrases about "liability lies on myself",while the situation is the opposite when it comes to general stuents;training students'combined respond time on "liability lies on others-attack,liability lies on myself-not attack" is shorter than that of general students.Such differences on respond time reflect that there exists implicit association on aggressive attribution and aggressive belief in training students.

Key words: liability attribution, implicit association, aggressive behaveior, social congintion

中图分类号:

B844.14

李安, 乐国安. 工读学生与普通学生对责任判断的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(2): 40-45.

LI An. A Comparative Study on Liability Judgment between Training Students and General Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2004, 20(2): 40-45.

参考文献

[1] Tremblay R E.The development of aggressive behaviour during childhood:What have we learned in the past century? [A] International Journal of Behavior Development [J].2000,Vol.2,No.24,129-141.
[2] Jared Y K.& Warren S.Appraisal Support,and Life Events:Predicting Outcom Behavior in School-Age Children[A].Child Development[J].September/October 2000,Vol.71,No.5,1441-1457.
[3] Greenwald A G,Mc Chee E,Schwartz J L K.Measuring Individual Difference in Implicit Association Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1998,74(5):181-198.
[4] Farnham S D,Greenwald A G,Banaji M R.Implicit self-esteem In Abrams,Dominic,Hogg Michael A ed.Social Identity and Social Cognition Blackwell Publishers Inc,1999,230-248.
[5] Greenwald A G,Klinger M R,Liu T J.Unoconcious processing of dichoptically masked words.Memory and cognition,1989,17:35-47.
[6] 蔡华俭,周颖,史青海.内隐联想测验(IAT)及其在性别刻板印象研究中的应用[J].社会心理研究.2001年第4期.
[7] 蔡华俭.Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍[J].心理科学进展,2003.11(3):339-344.
[8] Bushman B J,Baumeister R F,Phillips C M.Do People Aggress to Improve Their Mood? Catharsis Beliefs,Affect Regulation Opportunity,and Aggressive Responding[A].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology[J].July 2001,Vol.81,No.1,17-32.
[9] Marcus N E,Lindahl K M,Malik N M.Interparental Conflict,Children' Social Cognitions,and Child Aggression[A].Journal of Family Psychology[J].June 2001,Vol.15,No.2,315-333.
[10] Schwartz D,Chaang L,Farver J M.Correlates of Victimzation in Chinese Children'sPeer Groups [A].Development Psychology [J].July 2001,Vol.37,No.4,520-532.
[11] Farrell A D,Sullivan T N.Structure of the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory Self-Restraint Scale and Its Relation to Problem Behaviors in Adolescence[A].Developmental Psychology[J].July 2001,Vol.37,No.4.
[12] Andrews J A,Foster S L,Capaldi D.Hops H.Adolescent and Family Predictors of Physical Aggression,Communication,and Satisfaction in Young dult Couples:A Prospective Analysis[A].Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology[J].2000,Vol.68,No.2,195-208.

相关文章 15

[1]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[2]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[3]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[4]	刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[5]	金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 杨雪, 贾彦茹, 杨宏. 社会逆境感知对大学生攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 414-421.
[6]	张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持？来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[7]	高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[8]	陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 任秀华, 张璐, 张亚利, 姜永志. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367.
[9]	何婷, 宋子婧, 丁菀, 刘伟, 蔺秀云. 父母心理控制与对立违抗障碍儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 219-228.
[10]	宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 675-682.
[11]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 605-613.
[12]	孙丽君, 杜红芹, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 胡祥恩. 心理虐待与忽视对青少年攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 65-75.
[13]	夏天生, 刘君, 顾红磊, 董书亮. 父母冲突对青少年攻击行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 503-512.
[14]	杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 236-245.
[15]	张娟, 程刚, 王智, 张大均. 大学生性别情绪刻板印象的内隐和外显研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 668-675.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed