心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 193-199.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.08

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

语素意识与听写的双向预测关系:来自追踪研究的证据

张潮1, 丁嫄1, 李利平1, 陈庆平1, 伍新春2   

  1. 1. 山西师范大学教育科学学院, 山西省心理与认知行为实验教学中心, 临汾 041000;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 儿童阅读与学习研究中心, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2020-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春,E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目（13&ZD188）；山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目（J2019092）；山西师范大学教学改革创新项目（2018JGXM-07）；山西师范大学人文社会科学基金（SK1805）。

Reciprocal Relationship between Morphological Awareness and Character Dictation——A Longitudinal Study

ZHANG Chao1, DING Yuan1, LI Liping1, CHEN Qingping1, WU Xinchun2   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Experimental Teaching Center of Psychology and Cognitive Behavior, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000;
    2. Research Center of Children's Reading and Learning, Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2020-03-19

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 听写是个体书面语言发展的重要任务之一，语素意识作为阅读认知技能，与听写关系密切。为探究语素意识和听写的双向预测关系，对小学一、五年级共294名儿童的语素意识（同音语素意识、同形语素意识）和听写进行了为期一年的追踪研究。在控制了智力、年龄、语音意识和自回归效应后，结果发现：（1）一年级儿童的同音语素意识和同形语素意识对听写具有跨时间点的正向预测作用（解释率分别为7%、8%），而五年级儿童的语素意识对听写的跨时间点预测作用不显著；（2）五年级儿童的听写对同音语素意识和同形语素意识具有跨时间点的正向预测作用（解释率分别为5%、6%），而一年级儿童的听写对语素意识跨时间点的预测作用不显著。研究结果表明汉语儿童的语素意识和听写是单向的预测关系，二者关系随年级的变化而变化。

关键词: 同音语素意识, 同形语素意识, 听写

Abstract: Character dictation is an important ability in the process of individual literacy development, and morphological awareness is a vital cognitive factor that affects the ability of dictation. In order to explore whether the reciprocal prediction relationship between morphological awareness and character dictation changes over time, students in grade 1 and grade 5 were tested by morphological awareness (including homophone awareness and homograph awareness) and dictation in a two-wave study. Controlling for IQ, age, and phonological awareness, the results showed that:(1) T1 homophone awareness and T1 homograph awareness predicted significantly T2 character dictation in grade 1 (explaining 7% and 8% variance respectively), but T1 morphological awareness did not predict significantly T2 character dictation in grade 5; (2) T1 character dictation predicted significantly T2 homophone awareness and T2 homograph awareness in grade 5 (explaining 5% and 6% variance respectively), but T1 character dictation did not predict significantly T2 morphological awareness in grade 1. The results investigated that the bi-directional prediction relationship between morphological awareness and character dictation did not exist in grade 1 and grade 5 for Chinese children, and the relationship would change over time.

Key words: homophone awareness, homograph awareness, character dictation

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, E. B., Brimo, D., & Perrin, N. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1283-1305.
Arra, C. T., & Aaron, P. G. (2001). Effects of psycholinguistic instruction on spelling performance. Psychology in the Schools, 38(4), 357-363.
Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 163-172.
Boulware-Gooder, R., Malatesha Joshi, R., & Grigorenko, E. (2015). The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography in English and Russian spelling. Dyslexia, 21(2), 142-161.
Brown, G. D., & Ellis, N. C. (1994). Handbook of spelling:Theory, process, and intervention. Chichester, England:John Wiley & Sons.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Casalis, S., Deacon, S. H., & Pacton, S. (2011). How specific is the connection between morphological awareness and spelling? A study of French children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 499-511.
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability:Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751-774.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. Orlando, FL:Harcourt-Brace.
Chang, L. Y., Plaut, D. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2016). Visual complexity in orthographic learning:Modeling learning across writing system variations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 64-85.
Cheng, Y., Li, L., & Wu, X. (2015). The reciprocal relationship between compounding awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese:A latent growth model study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,440.
Henderson, E. H., & Templeton, S. (1986). A developmental perspective of formal spelling instruction through alphabet, pattern, and meaning. The Elementary School Journal, 86(3), 305-316.
Kemp, N. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words:Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 737-765.
Li, L. P., & Wu, X. C. (2015). Effects of metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from grades 2 to 4. Plos One, 10(3), e114417.
Lo, L. Y., Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., & Chung, K. (2016). The role of stroke knowledge in reading and spelling in Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 367-388.
McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A. B., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children's Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 743-751.
McCutchen, D., & Stull, S. (2015). Morphological awareness and children's writing:Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271-289.
Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., et al. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65-77.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children's awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 767-787.
Pan, J., Song, S., Su, M., McBride, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2016). On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills:Evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 19(6), 982-991.
Pittas, E., & Nunes, T. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek:A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1507-1527.
Preβler, A. L., Könen, T., Hasselhorn, M., & Krajewski, K. (2014). Cognitive preconditions of early reading and spelling:A latent-variable approach with longitudinal data. Reading and Writing, 27(2), 383-406.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy (MA):Harvard University Press Cambridge.
Shen, H. H., & Bear, D. R. (2000). Development of orthographic skills in Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 13(3), 197-236.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese:Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27-47.
Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. Y. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia:Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122-133.
Treiman, R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Kessler, B. (2015). Influences on spelling:Evidence from homophones. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5), 544-554.
Xu, Y., Chang, L. Y., Zhang, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2013). Reading, writing, and animation in character learning in Chinese as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 423-444.
Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Wong, Y. K., Chan, D. W. O., Chung, K. K. H., Lo, L. Y., et al. (2013). Longitudinal predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(6), 1245-1277.
Yeung, P., Ho, C. S. H., Chik, P. P. M., Lo, L. Y., Luan, H., Chan, D. W. O., et al. (2011). Reading and spelling Chinese among beginning readers:What skills make a difference? Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 285-313.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages:A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3-29.
李虹, 彭虹, 舒华. (2006). 汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展. 心理发展与教育, 22(1), 35-38.
李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. (2016). 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响. 心理发展与教育, 32(6), 698-705.
林敏, 刘翔平, 张婧乔, 康雪. (2009). 读写困难与听写困难儿童的言语和视知觉认知缺陷. 中国心理卫生杂志, 23(1), 40-43.
刘议泽, 李燕, 刘翔平. (2014). 汉语听写障碍儿童的形-形与音-音联结. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(3), 197-201.
栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. (2001). 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究. 心理发展与教育, 17(1), 1-5.
毛荣建, 刘翔平, 张旭. (2013). 汉字听写困难儿童字形整体表征的实验研究. 中国特殊教育, (6), 87-91.
王宁. (1991). 汉字的优化与简化. 中国社会科学, (1), 69-80.
杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 严云堂, 潘益中. (2008). 听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点. 心理发展与教育, 24(4), 34-38.
杨双, 宁宁, 潘益中, 石卫霞. (2010). 不同编码对听写困难儿童字形记忆的促进效应. 心理学报, 42(8), 845-852.
张大成, 张厚粲, 周晓林, 舒华. (1999). 听写任务下的字词加工. 语言文字应用, (1), 68-71.
张厚粲, 王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 21(2), 113-121.
[1] 温凯玲, 陈萍, 杨双, 宁宁. 前摄干扰对汉语听写困难儿童字形工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 153-160.
[2] 李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 698-705.
[3] 潘益中, 杨双, 杨美玲. 充分加工条件下听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(4): 344-350.
[4] 杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 严云堂, 潘益中. 听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 34-38,49.
[5] 栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(1): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发