心理发展与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 648-656.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.06.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年犯罪者道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理表征及其原因

张亚慧2,3, 鲁忠义1,2   

  1. 1. 吉林外国语大学教育学院, 长春 130117;
    2. 河北师范大学教育学院, 石家庄 050024;
    3. 沧州职业技术学院, 沧州 061001
  • 发布日期:2019-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 鲁忠义,E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“道德概念空间隐喻的认知神经机制研究——以仁义道德概念为例”(31271111)。

The Mental Representations of Juvenile Delinquents' Vertical Spatial Metaphor for Morality and the Contributing Factors

ZHANG Yahui2,3, LU Zhongyi1,2   

  1. 1. College of Education, Jilin International Studies University, Changchun 130117;
    2. College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024;
    3. Cangzhou Technical College, Cangzhou 061001
  • Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 该研究探讨了青少年犯罪者道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理表征及其原因。研究1和研究2分别采用内隐联想测验(IAT)和迫选式纸笔测验,考察无意识和意识条件下青少年犯罪者道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理表征。研究3采用问卷法和测验法,分析影响隐喻联结的因素。结果表明,青少年犯罪者已形成“道德是上,不道德是下”的隐喻联结,但联结强度较低。认知因素对青少年犯罪者道德概念垂直空间隐喻的形成起了非常重要的作用;而狱中再教育对其联结强度的提高也有不可忽视的作用。

关键词: 隐喻, 垂直空间隐喻, 道德概念, 青少年犯罪者

Abstract: This study aims to explore the mental representations of juvenile delinquents' vertical spatial metaphor for morality and their contributing factors. Experiment one uses implicit association test (IAT) and experiment two uses forced paper and pencil test, to inspect the mental representations under unconscious and conscious conditions respectively. The third experiment uses questionnaire and test method to investigate influencing factors of metaphorical connection. The results show that:juvenile delinquents have formed the metaphorical connection of "moral is up, immoral is down", but with lower connection strength; cognitive factors play an important role in the formation of a juvenile delinquent's vertical spatial metaphor for moral concept; the role of re-education in prison should be emphasized.

Key words: metaphor, vertical spatial metaphor, moral concept, Juvenile delinquent

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Barsalou,L.W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol System. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,22, 577-609.
Lakoff,G.,& Johnson,M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago:University of Chicago Publisher.
Lakoff,G.,& Johnson,M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York:Basic Books.
Meier,B.P.,Sellbom,M.,& Wygant,D.B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground:Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences,43(4), 757-767.
Sherman,G.D.,& Clore,G.L. (2009). The Color of Sin.:White and Black Are Perceptual Symbols of Moral Purity and Pollution. Psychological Science,20(8), 1019-1025.
Hill,P.L.,& Lapsley,D.K. (2009). The ups and downs of the moral personality:Why it's not so black and white. Journal of Research in Personality,43, 520-523.
Haidt,J.,& Joseph,C. (2004). Intuitive Ethics:How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues. The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences,133(4), 55-66.
Zhong,C.B.,& Liljenquist,K.A. (2006). Washing away your sins:Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science,313(5792), 1451-1452.
Schnall, S.,Benton,J.& Harvey,S. (2008). With a Clean Conscience:Cleanliness Reduces the Severity of Moral Judgments.Psychological Science,19(12), 1219-1222.
Greenwald,A.G.,McGhee,D.E.,& Schwartzi,J.L.K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition:The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(6), 1464-1480.
Greenwald,A.G.,Nosek,B.A.,& Banaji,M.R. (2003). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test:I.An Improved Scoring Algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(2), 197-216.
Casasanto,D. (2009). Embodiment of Abstract Concepts:Good and Bad in Right-and Left-Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,138(3), 351-367
鲁忠义,郭娟,冯晓慧. (2017). 卷入欺负行为儿童道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理表征. 心理科学,40(5), 1123-1128.
翟冬雪,鲁雅乔,鲁忠义. (2016). 儿童道德概念垂直空间隐喻的认知发展. 心理科学,39(5), 1171-1176.
王锃,鲁忠义. (2013). 道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响. 心理学报,45(5), 538-545.
吴念阳,郝静. (2006). 以道德为本体的概念隐喻. 上海师范大学学报(基础教育版),35, 51-55.
殷宏淼. (2014). 道德概念的隐喻表征研究(硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
阎书昌. (2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展,19(8), 1242-1248.
邹泓,张秋凌,王英春. (2005). 家庭功能与青少年犯罪的关系的研究进展. 心理发展与教育,3, 120-124.
罗大华. (2007). 犯罪心理学(第五版). 北京:中国政法大学出版社.
莫雷. (2008). 教育心理学. 北京:教育科学出版社.
李伯黍. (1993). 教育心理学. 上海:华东师范大学出版社.
罗大华,何为民. (2012). 犯罪心理学. 北京:中国政法大学出版社.
张慧,樊旭辉,赵兰. (1998). 狱中犯人心理状况及个性调查分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,6(3), 183-184.
樊琪. (2000). 1557例违法犯罪者的人格研究. 心理科学,23(1), 55-58.
[1] 丁凤琴, 孙逸舒, 赵虎英. 道德概念净脏隐喻映射的偏向性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 315-322.
[2] 贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[3] 杜萱, 林嘉懿, 陈黎静. 儿童和青少年的空间—时间隐喻图式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 513-519.
[4] 贾宁, 冯新明, 鲁忠义. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻对空间关系判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 267-273.
[5] 贾宁, 陈换娟, 鲁忠义. 句子启动范式下的道德概念空间隐喻:匹配抑制还是匹配易化?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 541-547.
[6] 丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 666-674.
[7] 贾宁, 蒋高芳. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理现实性及双向映射[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 158-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!