心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 315-322.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.03.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德概念净脏隐喻映射的偏向性

丁凤琴, 孙逸舒, 赵虎英   

  1. 宁夏大学教育学院, 银川 750021
  • 发布日期:2022-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 丁凤琴 E-mail:dingfqin@nxu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31860283)。

The Bias of the Mapping in Clean and Dirty Metaphor of Moral Concepts

DING Fengqin, SUN Yishu, Zhao Huying   

  1. School of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021
  • Published:2022-05-17

摘要: 基于概念隐喻理论探讨道德概念净脏隐喻映射的偏向性。实验一考察洁净和肮脏启动对中性刺激道德判断的影响,实验二考察道德和不道德启动对中性刺激净脏判断的影响。结果发现:(1)洁净和肮脏启动下被试对中性刺激的道德判断差异不显著;(2)道德词和不道德词启动下被试对中性刺激的净脏判断差异显著,相比不道德词启动,道德词启动下被试更倾向于对中性刺激作洁净判断。研究结果说明,道德概念净脏隐喻映射存在偏向性,从道德概念目标域到净脏始源域的隐喻映射力量更强。

关键词: 概念隐喻, 净脏, 隐喻映射, 偏向性

Abstract: On the basis of conceptual metaphor theory, this paper discussed the bias of the mapping in clean and dirty metaphor of moral concepts. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of clean and dirty priming on the moral judgment of neutral stimulus. Experiment 2 investigated the influence of moral and immoral priming on the clean and dirty judgment of neutral stimulus. The results showed that: (1) there was no significant difference in the moral judgment of neutral stimulus between the clean and dirty stimuli; (2) there was a significant difference in the clean and dirty judgment of neutral stimulus between the moral and immoral words. Compared with the immoral words, the subjects in the moral words priming group were more inclined to judge the cleanliness of neutral stimulus. The results of the two studies suggested that there was a bias in the clean and dirty metaphor of moral concepts. The mapping power from the target domain moral to the origin domain is stronger.

Key words: moral concepts, clean and dirty, metaphorical mapping, bias

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2012). The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life.Emotion, 12(1), 154-162.
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 364(1521), 1281-1289.
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind:Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579-593.
Chasteen, A. L.,Burdzy, D. C., & Pratt, J. (2010). Thinking of god moves attention. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 627-630.
Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing:Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46-55.
Cramwinckel, F. M., Cremer, D., & Dijke, M. H. V. (2013).Dirty hands make dirty leaders? how the touching of dirty objects leads to higher rewards for unethical followers. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1),93-100.
Danovitch, J., & Bloom, P. (2009). Children's extension of disgust to physical and moral events.Emotion, 9,107-112.
Engelen, J. A. A., Bouwmeester, S., Bruin, A. B. H. D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 659-675.
He, X. L., Chen, J., Zhang, E. T., & Li, J. N. (2015). Bidirectional associations of power and size in a priming task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 290-300.
Holland, R. W., Hendriks, M., & Aarts, H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16(9), 689-693.
Huang, Y., Tse, C.S., & Xie, J. (2018). The bidirectional congruency effect of brightness valence metaphoric association in the Stroop-like and priming paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 189(10), 76-92.
Jostmann, N. B., Lakëns, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance.Psychological Science, 20,1169-1174.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh:The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York:Basic Books.
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths:Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression.Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423-1425.
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue:Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity.Psychological Science, 21(3), 381-383.
Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words:Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381-398.
Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96-104.
Martyna, S., & Jozef, M. (2017). Metaphorical association between physical and moral purity in the context of one's own transgressions and immoral behavior of others. Psychology of Language and Communication, 21(1), 152-170.
Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004).Why the sunny side is up:Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247.
Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience:Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219-1222.
Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B. T., Jostmann, N. B., & Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty matters:Importance literally feels heavy.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 474- 478.
Webster, G. D., Urland, G. R., & Correll, J. (2012). Can uniform color color aggression? Quasi-experimental evidence from professional ice hockey.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 274-281.
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science. 322(5901), 606-607.
Williams, L.E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind:Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257-1267.
Wu, L. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination:Evidence from property generation.Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 173-189.
Xu, H., Bègue, L., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Washing the guilt away:Effects of personal versus vicarious cleansing on guilty feelings and prosocial behavior.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00097
Zhong, C.B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police:darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311-314.
Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely:Does social exclusion literally feel cold?Psychological Science, 19(9), 838-842.
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins:Threatened morality and physical cleansing.Science, 313(5792), 1451-1452.
Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 859-862.
陈玉明, 郭田友, 何立国, 燕良轼. (2014). 具身认知研究述评. 心理学探新, 34(6), 483-487.
丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. (2017). 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 666-672.
黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生. (2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应:蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48(6), 746-756.
贾宁, 蒋高芳. (2016). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理现实性及双向映射. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 158-165.
凌文辁, 郑晓明, 方俐洛. (2003). 社会规范的跨文化比较. 心理学报, 35(2), 246-254.
鲁忠义, 郭少鹏, 蒋泽亮. (2017). 道德概念大小隐喻的心理现实性及映射关系. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2, 70-78.
鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪. (2017). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性. 心理学报, 49(2), 186-196.
王丛兴, 马建平, 邓珏, 杨众望, 叶一舵. (2020). 概念加工深度影响道德概念水平方位隐喻联结. 心理学报, 52(4), 426-439.
王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2005)大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(4), 396-398.
吴念阳, 郝静. (2006). 以道德为本体的概念隐喻. 上海师范大学学报(基础教育版), 35(9), 51-55.
燕良轼, 颜志雄, 丁道群, 邹霞, 范伟. (2014). 道德厌恶启动后身体清洁词加工的时间特征:来自ERPs的证据. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(1),32-37.
阎书昌. (2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1242-1248.
叶浩生. (2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生. (2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 220-234.
张恩涛, 方杰, 林文毅, 罗俊龙. (2013). 抽象概念表征的具身认知观. 心理科学进展, 21(3), 429-436.
张凤华, 叶红燕. (2016). "洗"出来的效应:清洁启动对道德判断作用方向不同的影响因素探析. 心理科学, 39(5), 1236-1241.
[1] 丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 666-674.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!