心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 719-727.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.06.11

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师共情对学生学业成绩的促进:基于动画叙述模拟测量的多层线性分析

李伟健1,2, 丁菀1, 孙炳海1,2, 俞丽莉3   

  1. 1. 浙江师范大学心理研究所, 金华 321004;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875;
    3. 浙江省联合应用心理科学研究院, 杭州 310000
  • 出版日期:2015-11-15 发布日期:2015-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙炳海,E-mail:jky18@zjnu.cn E-mail:jky18@zjnu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金教育学国家青年项目(CBA120107)和教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(12JJD190002).

The Effects of Teachers' Empathy on Students' Academic Achievement:A Hierarchical Linear Analysis Based on the Measurement of Animated Narrative Vignettes Simulations

LI Weijian1,2, DING Wan1, SUN Binghai1,2, YU Lili3   

  1. 1. Institute of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Zhejiang Joint Research Institute of Applied Psychology, Hangzhou 310000
  • Online:2015-11-15 Published:2015-11-15

摘要: 以往研究认为教师共情能促进学生的社交能力和情绪的发展,但教师共情能否促进学生学业成绩呢?以往研究存在较多的分歧。本研究为进一步考察教师共情对学生学业成绩的作用,开发和运用针对教师职业特殊性的ANVs共情测量工具,采用准实验的方式,运用共情培训对20位实验组教师进行干预(另外20位教师作为控制组),同时收集相应实验组803名学生、控制组852名学生的期中、期末成绩,并采用多层线性的方式控制无关变量,关注学生原有成绩的影响,从而检验教师共情与学生学业成绩的关系。结果表明:(1)教师共情能力的提高能够促进学生学业成绩的提高;(2)在教师共情对学生学业成绩的促进作用中,学生原有成绩起到调节作用。

关键词: 教师共情, 学业成绩, 动画叙述短片模拟(ANVs)

Abstract: The effects of teachers' empathy on students' development of social skills and emotions has been demonstrated by previous researches,whereas to date no consistent conclusion is achieved for the facilitation of teachers' empathy onto students' academic development. To elucidate the influence of teachers' empathy to students' academic achievement, by using a quasi-experimental design, the current study developed and applied an ANVs tool that measures teachers' empathy, and utilized an empathy training to intervene 20 primary-school teachers in the treatment group(meanwhile, another 20 primary-school teachers in the control group didn't participate any related training). Correspondingly, mid-term academic grades and final grades of 803 students from the classes of 20 teachers in the treatment group and 852 students from the classes of another 20 teachers in the control group were collected. Considering different hierarchy of variables and the role of students' original academic grades, hierarchical linear analysis was conducted to examine the relationship of teachers' empathy to students' academic achievement. The findings indicated that:1) the improvement of teachers' empathy contributed to the improvement of students' academic achievement; 2) students' original academic grades had a mediating effect on the relationship between teachers' empathy and students' academic achievement.

Key words: teachers' empathy, academic achievement, animated narrative vignettes simulations

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Barr, J. J.(2011). The Relationship between teachers' empathy and perceptions of school culture. Educational Studies,37(3), 365-369.
Baskerville, D.(2011). Developing cohesion and building positive relationships through storytelling in a culturally diverse New Zealand classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(1), 107-115.
Bostic, T. B.,(2006). Teacher empathy and its relationship to the standardized test scores of diverse secondary students. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University. Richmond, Virginia.
Bozkurt, T,. Ozden, M. S,.(2010). The relationship between empathetic classroom climate and students' success.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,(5). 231-234
Buka, P.(2013). Promoting Academic Achievement through Positive Relationships. Journal of Educational and Social Research,3(3), 323.
Charmaz, K.(1995). Grounded theory. In J.A. Smith, R. Harre & L.V. Langenhove(Eds.) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London:Sage Publications.
Chau, J., Chang, A., Lee, I., Ip, W., Lee, D., & Wootton, Y.(2001). Effects of using videotaped vignettes on enhancing students' critical thinking ability in a baccalaureate nursing programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing,36(1), 112-119.
Carkhuff, R. R.(1969). Helping and Human Relations; A Primer for Lay and Professional Leaders. Volume I. Selection and Training. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Coffman, S. L.(1981). Empathy as a Relevant Instructor Variable in the Experiential Classroom. Group & Organization Studies, March,6(1), 114-120.
Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press(2nd ed.). New York:Academic Press.
Davis, M. H.,(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy:Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1), 113-126.
Dedousis-Wallace, A., Shute, R., Varlow, M., Murrihy, R., & Kidman, T.(2014). Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers. Educational Psychology,34(7), 862-875.
Edwards, N., Peterson, W. E., & Davies, B. L.(2006). Evaluation of a multiple component intervention to support the implementation of a 'Therapeutic Relationships' best practice guideline on nurses' communication skills. Patient Education and Counseling,63(1), 3-11.
Franklin, M. M.(2013). Teacher Impact on the Academic Achievement of Students of Poverty(Doctoral dissertation). TUI Universtity, California.
Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., et al.(2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers:effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instructional Science,43(4), 1-20.
Goldstein, H.(1995). Multilevel statistical models(2nd.). London:Edward Arnold.
Hoffman, M. L.(2001). Empathy and moral development:Implications for caring and justice. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Koc, M.(2011). Let's make a movie:Investigating pre-service teachers' reflections on using video-recorded role playing cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education,27(1), 95-106.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T.(2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence:Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior,27(6), 723-746.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J.(2003). The coach-athlete relationship:A motivational model. Journal of Sports Science,21(11), 883-904.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B.(1989). Designing qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.
McAllister. G., Irvine, J.J., Chair, D.(2002).The role of empathy in teaching culturally etudents:a qualitative study of teachers'beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education,53(5), 433-443
Patrick, H., Turner, J. C.,(2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school:Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record,105(8), 1521-1558.
Peart, N. A.., & Campbell, F. A.,(1999). At-risk students' perceptions of teacher effectiveness. Journal for a Just and Caring Education,5(3), 269-284.
Peck, N. F., Maude, S. P., & Brotherson, M. J,(2014). Understanding preschool teachers' perspectives on empathy:A qualitative inquiry. Early Childhood Education Journal,43(3), 169-179.
Perkins, S. R., & Atkinson, D. R.(1973). Effect of selected techniques for training resident assistants in human relations skills. Journal of Counseling Psychology,20(1), 84-90.
Raskauskas, J. L., Gregory. J., Harvey. S. T., Rifshana. F. & Evans. I. M.(2010). Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand:relationships with prosocial behaviour and classroom climate. Educational Research,52(1), 1-13.
Ryan A.M., Patrick H.(2001).The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal,38(2), 437-460.
Stetson, E. A., Hurley, A. M., & Miller, G. E.(2003). Can universal affective education programs be used to promote empathy in elementary aged children? A review of five curricula. Journal of Research in Character Education,1(2), 129-147.
Stiggins R. J.(1999). Assessment, student confidence, and school success. Phi Delta Kappan,81(3), 191-198.
Tettegah, S.(2004). Pre-service teacher's problem solving and victim empathy:What about Jamilah. In Poster session presented at theannual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Honolulu, HI.
Tettegah, S. Y.(2005). Technology, narratives, vignettes, and the intercultural and cross-cultural teaching portal. Urban education,40(4), 368-393.
Tettegah, S.,(2007). Pre-service teachers' victim empathy:Cognitions, problem solving and technology. Technology instruction cognition and learning,5(1), 41-68.
Winefield, H. R., & Chur-Hansen, A.(2000). Evaluating the outcome of communication skill teaching for entry-level medical students:does knowledge of empathy increase? Medical Education,34(2), 90-94.
杜林致, 赵鸣九.(2000). 独生子女与非独生子女在成就归因上的差异性.心理科学,(3), 355-356.
李伟健, 吕林, & 孙炳海.(2011). 认知神经研究范式下展望教师共情.中国社会科学报, 2011-11-17(012).
刘加霞, & 辛涛.(2000). 中学生学习动机, 学习策略与学业成绩的关系研究.教育理论与实践,20(9), 54-58.
戎幸, 孙炳海, 黄小忠, 蔡旻颖, & 李伟健.(2010). 人际反应指数量表的信度和效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,(2), 158-160.
张雷, 雷雳, & 郭伯良.(2003). 多层线性模型应用(Vol. 5). 北京:教育科学出版社.
张大均, & 梁英.(1997). 师生对学业成败归因的特点及其交互作用.西南大学学报:社会科学版,(6), 55-61.
赵希斌.(2006). 不同学习成绩学生对教师评价行为的知觉与其学习心理的关系.教育学报,(4), 91-96.
[1] 李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[2] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[3] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[4] 梁兴丽, 何津, 周佶俊, 刘萍萍. 认知能力对学业成绩的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 449-461.
[5] 王明忠, 王静, 王保英, 曲西茜, 辛福康. 粗暴养育与青少年学业成绩:有调节的中介分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 67-76.
[6] 郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.
[7] 陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[8] 聂倩, 张大均, 滕召军, 陆星月, 郭成. 学生感知的学校氛围与主客观学业成绩:心理素质及其分维度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 715-723.
[9] 程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[10] 王明忠, 王梦然, 王静. 父母冲突损害青少年学业成绩:努力控制与课堂参与的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
[11] 丁雪辰, 邓欣媚, 桑标, 李丹. 青少年早期社交回避与同伴关系问题:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 137-145.
[12] 蒋虹, 吕厚超. 青少年未来时间洞察力与学业成绩的关系:坚韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 321-327.
[13] 潘斌, 张良, 张文新, 纪林芹. 青少年学业成绩不良、学业压力与意志控制的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 717-724.
[14] 王伟, 雷雳, 王兴超. 大学生主动性人格对学业成绩的影响:学业自我效能感和学习适应的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 579-586.
[15] 廖水蓉, 芦咏莉, 陈聆帙, 聂晋文. 学生学业成绩和教师控制知觉对教师差别行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 330-338.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!