心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 648-653.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.06.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同分配情境下儿童公平行为的发展

梁福成1, 王心怡2, 唐卫海3   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学校长办公室, 天津 300387;
    2. 武警部队后勤学院基础部军事心理学教研室, 天津 300309;
    3. 天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387
  • 出版日期:2015-11-15 发布日期:2015-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 唐卫海,E-mail:twhpsy@126.com E-mail:twhpsy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(14JJD190004)资助.

The Development of Children's Fair Behavior in Different Distribution Situations

LIANG Fucheng1, WANG Xinyi2, TANG Weihai3   

  1. 1. President Office, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China;
    2. Military psychology teaching and research section of Basic Department, Logistics University of People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin 300309, China;
    3. School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
  • Online:2015-11-15 Published:2015-11-15

摘要: 为探究儿童在不同利益对比情境以及与己利益无关情境中的公平行为,研究呈现了自我任务的劣势博弈、优势博弈、冲突博弈以及第三方任务博弈四种分配情境。自我任务中儿童需要为自己与另一名匿名儿童迫选方案,第三方任务中则需为两名匿名儿童迫选方案。结果发现:(1)劣势博弈中所有年龄组均倾向于选择公平方案,而非劣势方案;(2)优势博弈中,8岁、10岁组选择公平方案的人显著多于优势方案,而4岁、6岁组均无显著差异;(3)冲突博弈中,4岁、6岁组选择优势方案的人显著多于劣势方案,而8岁、10岁组均无显著差异;(4)第三方博弈中, 8岁、10岁组选择公平方案的人显著多于不公平方案,而4岁、6岁组均无显著差异。这表明,4岁~6岁儿童尚未真正获得公平观念,且以获得个人利益为主;而8岁是真正获得公平观念的转折年龄,8~10岁儿童对人对己均坚持公平原则,且表现出利他倾向。

关键词: 公平, 儿童, 自我任务, 第三方任务

Abstract: To explore the development of children's fair behavior, the study presented four distribution situations. They were disadvantage game(2/2, 0/4) and(2/2, 1/3) in self task, advantage game(2/2, 4/0) and(2/2, 3/1) in self task, conflict game(0/4, 4/0) and(1/3, 3/1) in self task and(2/2, 0/4) and(2/2, 1/3) game in third-party task. This study selected four groups, namely, 4 year-old group, 6 year-old group, 8 year-old group and 10 year-old group, each containing 30 cases as participants. Children in self task were forced to choose one allocation solution for themselves and other anonymous child. Children in third-party task were forced to choose one allocation solution for another two anonymous children. It showed that:(1) the number of 4, 6, 8,10 year-old children who chose 2/2 fair option was respectively significantly more than 0/4 or 1/3 disadvantage option on disadvantage game of self task;(2) the number of 8 year-old and 10 year-old children who chose 2/2 fair option was respectively significantly more than 4/0 or 3/1 advantage option on advantage game of self task, but there was no significant difference for 4 and 6 year-old children;(3) the number of 4 and 6 year-old children who chose 4/0 or 3/1 self-interest option was respectively significantly more than 0/4 or 1/3 altruism option on conflict game of self task; but there was no significant difference for 8 and 10 year-old children;(4) the number of 8 and 10 year-old children who chose 2/2 fair option was significantly more than 0/4 or 1/3unfair option on the third-party task, but there was no significant difference for 4 and 6 year-old children. The present study demonstrated that 4 and 6 year-old children gave priority to self-interest consideration. When they made a decision for others, they did not adhere to the principle of fairness. Children as young as eight were at the turning point of acquiring the concept of fairness. 8 and 10 year-old children considered fair principle as criteria to make decisions and showed a tendency of altruism.

Key words: fairness, children, self task, third-party task

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K.(2011). "I had so much it didn't seem fair":Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity.Cognition,120, 215-224.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A.(2000). ERC:A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review,90(1), 166-193.
Civai, C., Crescentini, C., Rustichini, A., & Rumiati,R. I.(2012). Equality versus self-interest in the brain:differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage,62, 102-112.
Clavien,C., & Klein,R.A.(2010). Eager for fairness or for revenge? Psychological altruism in economics.Economics and Philosophy,26, 267-290.
Damon, W.(1980). Patterns of change in children's social reasoning:A two-year longitudinal study. Child Development,51(4), 1010-1017.
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B.(2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature,454(7208), 1079-1083.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M.(1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,114(3), 817-868.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C.(2004). Intuitive ethics:How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues.Daedalus,133(4),55-66.
Kogut, T.(2012). Knowing what I should, doing what I want:From selfishness to inequity aversion in young children's sharing behavior.Journal of Economic Psychology,33, 226-236.
LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J.(2009). When getting something good is bad:Even three-year-olds react to inequity. Social Development. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00560.x.
Loewenstein, G., Bazerman, M. H., & Thompson, L.(1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 426-441.
Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Liping, G., Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A., & Berg, B.(2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3-and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,40(3), 416-442.
Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R.(2012). Children discard a resource to avoid inequity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,141(2), 382-395.
Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K.(2014). Anti-equality:Social comparison in young children. Cognition,130(2), 152-156.
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D.(2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness?Psychological Science,23(2), 196-204.
Smith, C. E., Blake,P. R. & Harris, P. L.(2013). I should but I won't:Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS ONE,8(3):e59510.
Sommerville, J. A., Schmidt, M. F. H., Yun, J.-E., & Burns, M.(2013). The development of fairness expectations and prosocial behavior in the second year of life. Infancy,18(1), 40-66.
Takagishi, H., Kameshima, S., Schug, J., Koizumi, M., & Yamagishi, T.(2010). Theory of mind enhances Preference for fairness.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,105, 130-137.
刘文, 朱琳, 温国旗.(2014). 出价情境下的婴幼儿公平敏感性.心理科学进展,22(4), 618-624.
王斯, 苏彦捷.(2013). 从理解到使用:心理理论与儿童不同情境中的分配公平性.心理学报,45(11), 124-1250.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7] 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14] 李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!