心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 327-333.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.10

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学生调节聚焦对生活满意度的影响:压力应对方式的中介作用

邸妙词1, 刘儒德1,2, 高钦1, 王佳1, 魏军3, 唐铭1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京 100875;
    2. 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    3. 香港中文大学教育学院, 香港
  • 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2015-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘儒德,E-mail:rdliu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:rdliu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAI36B03).

Regulatory Focus and Life Satisfaction in Primary School Students: The Mediating Effect of Coping Style

DI Miaoci1, LIU Rude1,2, GAO Qin1, WANG Jia1, WEI Jun3, TANG Ming1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875;
    3. Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • Online:2015-05-15 Published:2015-05-15

摘要: 采用调节聚焦问卷、压力应对方式问卷和生活满意度问卷对北京市五所学校1174名小学生进行调查, 考察调节聚焦对小学生压力应对方式、生活满意度的影响, 并检验应对方式在调节聚焦和生活满意度之间的中介作用。结果发现:(1)促进定向对小学生生活满意度有显著正向预测作用, 预防定向对生活满意度有显著负向预测作用;(2)积极应对和促进定向更相关, 消极应对和预防定向更相关;(3)积极应对在促进定向和生活满意度之间起着完全中介的作用, 积极应对、消极应对均在预防定向和生活满意度之间起着部分中介的作用。

关键词: 小学生, 调节聚焦, 应对方式, 生活满意度

Abstract: The present study investigated the antecedent role of regulatory foci in elementary school students' life satisfaction and coping strategies in response to stressful situations. Regulatory foci, coping style, and life satisfaction were assessed by self-reported measures in a sample of 1174 Chinese elementary school students. The structural equation modeling results revealed that: (1) Promotion focus presented significantly positive effect on life satisfaction, whereas prevention focus presented significantly negative effect on life satisfaction. (2) Correlation analysis indicated that positive coping style more associated with promotion focus than prevention focus, while negative coping style more associated with prevention focus than promotion focus. (3) Positive coping style fully mediated the relationship between promotion focus and life satisfaction, and both coping styles partially mediated the relationship between prevention focus and life satisfaction.

Key words: primary school students, regulatory focus, coping style, life satisfaction

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35-66.
Deniz, M. E. (2006). The relationships among coping with stress, life satisfaction, decision-making styles and decision self-esteem: An investigation with Turkish University students. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 34(9), 1161-1170.
Forster, J., & Friedman, R. S. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013.
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Bianco, A. T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 148-164.
Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P., et al. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160-172.
Healy, C. M., & McKay, M. F. (2000). Nursing stress: the effects of coping strategies and job satisfaction in a sample of Australian nurses. Journal of Advanced Nurings, 31(3), 681-688.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
Higgins, E. T., Bond, R. N., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1986). Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: how magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 5-15.
Higgins, E. T., & Crowe, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Hoppock R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York:Harper&Row.
Hsing-Chau, T., & Long-Min, K. (2009). Regulatory Focus, transformational leadership, uncertainty towards organizational change, and job Satisfaction: In a Taiwan's cultural setting. Asia Pacific Management Review, 14(2), 215-235.
Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66(1-2), 3-33.
Huebner, E. S., Laughlin, J. E., Ash, C., & Gilman, R. (1998). Further validation of the Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(2), 118-134.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-274.
Keller, J., Hurst, M., & Uskul, A. (2008). Prevention-focused self-regulation and aggressiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 800-820.
Lanaj, K., Chang, C. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998-1034.
Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122-1134.
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864.
Proctor, C. L., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(5), 583-630.
Scholer, A. A., Zou, X., & Fujita, K., Stroessner, S. J., Higgins, E. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 215-231.
Sinclair, L., & Fehr, B. (2005). Voice versus loyalty: Self-construals and responses to dissatisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 298-304.
Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Coping style as a psychological resource of grateful people. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(9), 1076-1093.
Zaal, M. P., Laar, C. V., Ståhl, T., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 670-689.
李想. (2007). 小学生应对方式特点及其与气质关系的研究. 辽宁师范大学硕士学位论文.
聂林. (2014). 学习型组织文化、工作满意度对组织承诺的影响研究. 山东大学博士学位论文.
孙配贞, 郑雪, 余祖伟. (2010). 初中生感戴状况与学校生活满意度的关系:应对方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,26(01), 67-72.
孙莹, 陶芳标. (2005). 中学生学校生活满意度与自尊、应对方式的相关性. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(11), 741-744.
涂阳军, 郭永玉. (2011). 生活事件对负性情绪的影响:社会支持的调节效应与应对方式的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志,19(05), 652-655.
王鑫强, 张大均. (2012). 初中生生活满意度的发展趋势及心理韧性的影响:2年追踪研究. 心理发展与教育,28(01), 91-98.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
吴明霞. (2000). 30年来西方关于主观幸福感的理论发展. 心理学动态,8(04), 23-28.
杨海荣, 石国兴, 崔春华. (2005). 初中生应对方式与生活满意度心理健康的相关研究. 中国行为医学科学, 14(2), 116-117.
姚琦, 乐国安. (2009). 动机理论的新发展:调节定向理论. 心理科学进展,17(06), 1264-1273.
[1] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[2] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[3] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[4] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[5] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[6] 苏志强, 马郑豫. 童年期友谊质量与孤独感的纵向发展关系:应对方式的共变作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 31-39.
[7] 李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响:经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[8] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[9] 蔡雪斌, 桂守才, 唐易齐, 张硕, 许明星. 父母教养方式对青少年心理复原力的影响:自我控制与调节聚焦的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 505-512.
[10] 何安明, 万娇娇, 惠秋平. 手机依赖与青少年心理健康的关系:学业倦怠的中介作用和应对方式的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 391-398.
[11] 沈怡佳, 张国华, 何健康, 罗丽兰, 韩锦涛, 江波. 父母学习陪伴与小学生学业不良的关系:亲子学业沟通的中介作用和学习负担的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[12] 洪幼娟, 林斐, 刘丽婷, 林宛儒, 连榕, 林荣茂. 受害者公正敏感性对生活满意度的影响:上行社会比较和妒忌的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 592-600.
[13] 苏志强, 马郑豫, 张大均, 马健云. 童年期儿童应对方式发展的成因:特质论还是情境论?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 335-343.
[14] 程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[15] 彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!