Psychological Development and Education ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 588-594.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Stability of Preschooler’s Peer Relationship

LIU Shao-ying1, WANG Fang2, ZHU Yao2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
    2. Affiliated Kindergartens, Zhejiang Normal School, Hangzhou 310012, China
  • Online:2012-11-15 Published:2012-11-15

Abstract: The stability of peer relationship was a fundamental question that was inherently appealing to developmental psychologists.In preschool years,group relations in peers began and peer relationship consolidated. The present longitudinal study examined the stability of preschooler's peer relationship.By studying the stability of peer relationship,we gained insight into questions regarding the degree to which the stability of continuous variables in peer relations,and especially whether the social preference development changed across early childhood. The author determined a sample of 71 preschool-aged children(40 boys,31 girls;M age=46.42 months), who came from three classes in different time points that the first class was from 2004 to 2006,the second class was from 2005 to 2007,and the third class was from 2006 to 2008.Children completed peer nomination for 3 successive years from grade 1 to grade 3. Results indicated that long-term stability of four continuous dimensions of peer relationship(peer acceptance, peer rejection,social preference,and social impact)was influenced by 2 factors:children's age and the length of the time interval.Four continuous dimensions of peer relationship had moderate stability(r=0.41~0.59) between grade 2 and grade 3.Social preference had moderate stability(r=0.31~0.59)from grade 1 to grade 3. Peer acceptance had moderate stability(r=0.37)between grade 1 and grade 2.Other dimensions had no significant correlations among three grades.Grade 2 was the transition of peer relationship in preschool years. Using a clustering technique,the study identified four groups of children with distinct longitudinal profiles of social preference development-a stable average group(64.79%),an unstable popular group(15.49%),an unstable unpopular group(12.68%),and an unstable group from average to popular(7.04%).The result indicated that 64.79% children'social preference kept stable for three years. In this experiment,the effect of gender on social preference was significant(F(1,70)=11.970,p<0.05), while the other two effects were not significant.So girls were more popular than boys consistently in three years. There was no significant gender and age difference on social impact. Conclusions:The current study provided evidence for moderate stability of peer status in preschool years,and girls were more popular than boys.The result suggested that grade 2 was the key time for the stability of peer relationship.

Key words: Preschooler, Peer Relationship, Peer nomination, Stability

CLC Number: 

  • B844.1
[1] Baines,E.,&Blatchford,P.(2009).Sex differences in the structure and stability of children's playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3),743-760.
[2] Benenson,J.,Apostoleris,N.,&Parnass,J.(1998).The Organization of Children's Same-Sex Peer Relationships.New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,1998(81),5-23.
[3] Brendgen,M.,Vitaro,F.,Bukowski,W.M.,Doyle,A.B.,& Markiewicz,D.(2001).Developmental profiles of peer social preference over the course of elementary school:associations with trajectories of externalizing and internalizing behavior.Developmental Psychology,37(3),308-320.
[4] Bukowski,W.M.,&Adams,R.(2005).Peer relationships and psychopathology:Markers,moderators,mediators,mechanisms,and meanings.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,34 (1),3-10.
[5] Cillessen,A.H.N.,Bukowski,W.M.,&Haselager,G.J.T. (2000).Stability of sociometric categories.New directions for child and adolescent development,2000(88),75-93.
[6] Fabes,R.A.,Martin,C.L.,&Hanish,L.D.(2004).The Next 50 Years:Considering Gender as a Context for Understanding Young Children's Peer Relationships.Merrill Palmer Quarterly Journal of Developmental Psychology,50(3),260-273.
[7] Greenman,P.S.,Schneider,B.H.,&Tomada,G.(2009).Stability and change in patterns of peer rejection:Implications for children's academic performance over time.School Psychology International,30(2),163-183.
[8] Hay,D.F.(2005).Early peer relations and their impact on children's development.In.RE Tremblay,RG Barr,&RDeV Peters,(éds).Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development(online).Montréal,Québec:Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development.Récupéréle,1-6.
[9] Hay,D.F.,Payne,A.,&Chadwick,A.(2004).Peer relations in childhood.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(1),84-108.
[10] Howes,C.,&Phillipsen,L.(1998).Continuity in children's relations with peers.Social Development,7(3),340-349.
[11] Jiang,X.L.,&Cillessen,A.H.N.(2005).Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status:A meta-analysis.Developmental Review,25(1),1-25.
[12] Ladd,G.W.(1999).Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood.Annual Review of Psychology,50(1),333-359.
[13] Laine,K.,Neitola,M.,Auremaa,J.,&Laakkonen,E.(2010).Longitudinal study on the co-occurrence of peer problems at daycare centre,in preschool and first grade of school.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,54(5),471-485.
[14] Laursen,B.,&Hoff,E.(2006).Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,52 (3),377-389.
[15] Martinsen,H.,Narland,T.,&Vereijken,B.(2010).Observation-based descriptions of social status in the pre-school.Early Child Development and Care,180(9),1231-1241.
[16] Meijs,N.,Cillessen,A.H.N.,Scholte,R.H.J.,Segers,E.,& Spijkerman,R.(2009).Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,39(1),62-72.
[17] Mouton,J.S.,Blake,R.R.,&Fruchter,B.(1955).The reliability of sociometric measures.Sociometry,18(1),7-48.
[18] Poteat,G.M.,Ironsmith,M.,&Bullock,J.(1986).The classification of preschool children's sociometric status.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,1(4),349-360.
[19] Rubin,K.H.,Bukowski,W.,&Parker,J.G.(2003).Peer interactions, relationships,and groups.Handbook of child psychology.Vol3.Social,Emotional,and Personality Development,6th.ed.,619-700.
[20] Shin,N.,Vaughn,B.E.,Kim,M.,Krzysik,L.,Bost,K.K.,McBride,B.,et al.(2011).Longitudinal analyses of a hierarchical model of peer social competence for preschool children structural fidelity and external correlates.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,57(1),73-103.
[21] Vitaro,F.,Tremblay,R.E.,Gagnon,C.,&Boivin,M.(1992).Peer rejection from kindergarten to Grade 2:Outcomes,correlates, and prediction.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly:Journal of Developmental Psychology,38(3),382-400.
[22] Walker,S.(2009).Sociometric stability and the behavioral correlates of peer acceptance in early childhood.The Journal of genetic psychology, 170(4),339-358.
[23] 李艳菊,姜勇.(2008).3~6岁幼儿同伴交往能力的结构与发展特点.幼儿教育(教育科学版),(7),70-73.
[24] 刘红云.(2007).如何描述发展趋势的差异:潜变量混合增长模型.心理科学进展,15(3),539-544.
[25] 庞丽娟.(1994).同伴提名法与幼儿同伴交往的研究.心理发展与教育,1(1),18-22.
[26] 邹晓燕,李英玉,黄晓梅.(2006).幼儿同伴关系发展特点与教育.幼儿教育(教育科学版),(7),72-76.
[1] YAN Zhiqiang, ZHOU Ke, ZENG Xiao, XU Hui, ZHU Xiaoqian, ZHANG Juan. The Relationship between Preschooler’s Executive Function and Aggressive Behavior: The Mediation Effect of Cognitive Empathy [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[2] ZHANG Wenjie, FAN Zeng, LI Lei, LIU Yi, ZHONG Yiping. The Influence of Recipients' Conventional Rule and Resource Neediness on Sharing Behavior among Preschoolers at Age of 5~6 [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[3] NIU Xiang, RAN Guangming. The Association between Peer Relationship and Preschoolers' Problem Behavior: A Three-level Meta-analysis [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[4] ZHANG Cai, JIANG Yiru, ZHU Chengwei, SHAO Tingting, WANG Haitao, CHEN Fumei. The Association between School Belonging and Smartphone Dependence in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Learning Anxiety and the Moderating Role of Peer Relationship [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 848-858.
[5] LIU Xiaojie, LI Yan. The Influence of Mother's Perception of Coparenting on Behavior Problems among Preschoolers: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[6] XU Junting, BAO Wei, LUO Junlong. Unstable Control Deprivation Impairs Working Memory Updating [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 1-9.
[7] BAI Rong, YAN Rong, WANG Qian, LI Ye, XING Shufen. The Relationships between Executive Functions and Problem Behavior: Situational Specificity and Gender Differences [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[8] LI Zhanxing, ZHU Liqi. Can It Be Owner? Young Children's Understanding of Ownership Agents [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 465-471.
[9] ZHENG Chenye, HUANG Yan, WANG Jingmei, JIANG Cundui, LU Yingjun. The Effect of Face Clues on Real and Cartoon Face Memory of 4~6-year-olds [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[10] WANG Jiale, ZHANG Hui, YANG Min. The Effect of Emotional Valence and Facial Type on Children's Inattentional Blindness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 153-158.
[11] LUO Shilan, ZHANG Dajun, LIU Yunyan. Family Socioeconomic Status and Preschoolers' Good Behavior Habits: Mediating Effects of Parenting Style and Preschoolers' Psychological Suzhi [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
[12] WANG Su, GAI Xiaosong. Development Trends and Gender Differences of Cool and Hot Self-regulation for Children Aged 3~4—A Longitudinal Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(6): 641-648.
[13] LIU Xiaoshi, LIU Shihong, MO Bibo, LI Dan, FU Rui. Extroversion and Aggressive Behavior in Early Childhood: Moderating Effects of Self-control and Maternal Warmth [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[14] LI Qianqian, YAO Lining, LIANG Jinjun, XING Shufen. Differential influence of Television Violence on Preschool Children's Social Behavior——The Debate between the “the General Aggressive Model” and “Catalyst Model” Theory [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 545-554.
[15] WANG Kai, ZHANG Ye. The Effect of Campus Exclusion on Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: Mediating Role of Peer Relationship and Core Self-evaluation [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 594-604.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!