Psychological Development and Education ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 61-67.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Interpersonal Trust for Different Domains and Risk Levels:Comparing the Trust Circle of Chinese and Canadians

NIU Jiang-he1, XIN Zi-qiang2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2009-04-15 Published:2009-04-15

Abstract: In everyday life,varied economic and information exchanges frequently occur between one and another,a primary condition of which is both parities trusting each other.In the study,a new construct named as "trust circle" was developed and the size of the circle was used as an index of one's interpersonal trust level.The purpose of the study was to explore how the size of one's trust circle is affected by the trust domain,risk level and culture in China and Canada.An questionnaire was administrated to 100 Chinese residents in China (mean age 32.92) and 102 Canadians (mean age 31.94) who participated in the study voluntarily.The results showed that:(1) the average trust circle size in different domains differs,specifically,the size of the trust circle in the economic situation is the largest,the size is the smallest in the negative information sharing context and it is in the middle in the positive personal/social information sharing context; (2) the trust circle size varies with risk level; as the economic risk increases the trust circle becomes smaller,as the degree of the shared positive information increases the trust circle becomes larger,and as the degree of the shared negative information increases the trust circle becomes smaller; (3) the trust circle sizes in different cultures are not the same,for example,trust circle size of Chinese participants is larger than Canadians' in the economic risk situation,and Canadians,trust circle sizes are larger than Chinese counterparts' in both positive and negative personal/social information sharing domains.Thus,it can be concluded that whether people trust others is affected by the related domain,the risk level,the culture and interactions of two or three factors.Aforementioned results are heuristic for clarifying culture differences of interpersonal trust and for promoting cross culture communication of people from China and Canada.

Key words: interpersonal trust, trust circle, risk, domain, cross-culture research

CLC Number: 

  • B844.3
[1] Yamagishi T,Yamagishi M.Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan.Motivation and Emotion,1994,18:129-166.
[2] Rousseau D M,Sitkin S B,Burt R S,Camerer C.Not so different after all:A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review,1998,23:393-404.
[3] Lane C.Introduction:Theories and issue in the study of trust.In:C Lane,R Bachmann (Eds.) Trust within and between organizations (pp.1-30).New York:Oxford University Press,1998.
[4] Williamson O E.Calculativeness,trust and economic organization.Journal of Law and Economics,1993,30:131-145.
[5] Weber M.The religion of China:Confucianism and Taoism.New York:The Free Press,1951.
[6] 张建新,Bond M H.指向具体人物对象的人际信任:跨文化比较及其认知模型.心理学报,1993,25 (2):164-172.
[7] 张建新,张妙清,梁觉.殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用.心理学报,2000,32 (3):311-316.
[8] 费孝通.乡土中国,生育制度.北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
[9] Hardin R.Trust.Cambridge:Polity Press,2006.
[10] Niu Jianghe.Circles of trust:A comparison of the size and composition of trust circles in Canada and in China.Doctoral dissertation,Carleton University,Ottawa,Canada,2007.
[11] Aiken K D,Boush D M.Trustmarks,objective-source ratings,66 and implied investments in advertising:Investigating online trust and the context-specific nature of internet signals.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2006,34 (3):308-323.
[12] DeSteno D A,Valdesolo P,Bartlett M Y.Jealousy and the threatened self:Getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91 (4):626-641.
[13] Fukuyama F.Trust:The social virtues and the creation of prosperity.New York:Free Press,1995.
[14] Viklund M J.Trust and risk perception in Western Europe:A cross-national study.Risk Analysis,2003,23 (4):727-738.
[15] Sohler N L,Fitzpatrick L K,Lindsay R G,Anastos K,Cunningham C O.Does patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance influence ratings of trust in people with HIV infection? AIDS and Behavior,2007,11 (6):884-896.
[16] 王飞雪,山岸俊男.信任的中、日、美比较研究.社会学研究,1999,2:67-82.
[17] Berry J W.Cross-cultural psychology:A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,2000,3:197-205.
[18] Triandis H C,Brislin R,Hui C H.Cross-cultural training across the individualism collectivism divide.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,1988,12:269-289.
[19] Yuki M,Maddux W W,Brewer M B,Takemura K.Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2005,31 (1):48-62.
[20] 黄光国,胡先缙等.面子:中国人的权力游戏.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[21] 张建新,周明洁.中国人人格结构探索:人格特质六因素假说.心理科学进展,2006,14 (4):574-585.
[22] Cvetkovich G,Siegrist M,Murray R,Tragesser S.New information and social trust:Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers.Risk Analysis,2002,22 (2):359-367.
[23] 翟学伟.中国人行动的逻辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.
[24] Harris C R,Christenfeld N.Jealousy and rational responses to infidelity across gender and culture.Psychological Science,1996,7 (6):378-379.
[25] Watkins D,Mortazavi S,Troffmova I.Independent and interdependent conceptions of self:An investigation of age,gender,and culture differences in importance and satisfaction ratings.The Journal of Comparative Social Science,2000,34:113-114.
[26] 彭泗清.对人与对事:人际交往中的关系区分度与事件区 分度.第四届华人心理与行为科学学术研讨会论文(台北),1997.
[1] WANG Yulong, ZHAO Jingfei, LIN Xiuyun. Cumulative Effects of Family Risk Factors on Adolescent Non-suicidal Self-injury and Its Gender Difference [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] CHEN Zixun, LI Jinwen, WANG Yumeng, LIU Xia. The Relationship between Cumulative Environmental Risk and Non-suicidal Self-injury among College Students: The Effects of Emotion Regulation Strategies [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[3] XU Wenming, FANG Yeyi, YE Caixia. The Effect of Cumulative Family Early Risks on Internalizing Problem among Adolescents [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 793-803.
[4] XIAO Xue, GUO Lei, ZHAO Yongping, CHEN Fuguo. Cumulative Ecological Risk on Bullying Victimization in Junior High School Students: The Moderating Effects of Resilience [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[5] CHEN Jianwen, LIU Yan, TAN Qianbao. The Relationship of Cumulative Ecological Risk and Higher Vocational College Students’ Learning Burnout: The Mediation Effect of Negative Self-schema and Internet Addiction [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 576-583.
[6] YUAN Yanyun, WANG Zhihang, SUN Qing, WANG Dongfang, YIN Xiayun, LI Zhihua. The Relationship between Cumulative Family Risk and Emotional Problems among Impoverished Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 100-108.
[7] REN Yi, HUANG Silin. The Mechanisms of Poverty Impedes Children's Executive Function [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 134-143.
[8] LIU Conghui, DONG Yan, WANG Hongfei, ZHANG Denghao. Social Exclusion Experience and Health Condition among the Rural Elders: The Moderated Mediating Effect [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[9] YUAN Keman, LI Bailu, LIANG Lichan, BIAN Yufang. Cumulative Contextual Risk and Subjective Well-being in Migrant Children: The Compensatory Effect and Protective Effect of Individual Protective Factors [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
[10] CHEN Hui, HE Ting, TANG Yuanqiong, TANG Yixin, LU Fengyong, LIN Xiuyun. The Associations and Pathways between Empathy and Adolescent Internalizing and Externalizing Problems [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(3): 439-446.
[11] CHENG Huabin, LIU Xia, LI Yimin, LI Yongxin. Is Parenting a Happy Experience? Review on Parental Burnout [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(1): 146-152.
[12] XIONG Junmei, HAI Man, HUANG Fei, XIN Liang, XU Ying. Family Cumulative Risk and Mental Health in Chinese Adolescents: The Compensatory and Moderating Effects of Psychological Capital [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(1): 94-102.
[13] LIU Yanchun, CHEN Jiao. The Curvilinear Relationship between Paternal and Maternal Psychological Control and Adolescents' Risk-taking Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Adolescents' Self-esteem [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(4): 401-410.
[14] YI Mei, TIAN Yuan, MING Hua, HUANG Silin, XIN Ziqiang. Relationship between Belief in a Just World and Social Responsibility among Undergraduate Students: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Trust and the Gender Difference [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[15] LIU Lingling, TIAN Lumei, GUO Junjie. The Associations of Parent-adolescent Relationship with Adolescent Risk-taking Behavior: A Moderated Mediating Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(2): 210-218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!