Psychological Development and Education ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 346-356.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.03.05
Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Zhiqin1, XIONG Meng1,2
CLC Number:
| Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed II, A., Lim, V, K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141. Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119. Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350. Buelga, S., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Cava, M. (2017). Differences in family climate and family communication among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyber bully-victims in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 164-173. Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34(6), 613-629. Fang, J., Wang, X., Yuan, K. -H., Wen, Z., Yu, X., & Zhang, G. (2020). Callous-Unemotional traits and cyberbullying perpetration: The mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, Article 109829.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109829 Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2018). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134-153. Gotowiec, S., & van Mastrigt, S. (2018). Having versus doing: The roles of moral identity internalization and symbolization for prosocial behaviors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 75-91. Haberlin, K. A., & Atkin, D. J. (2022). Mobile gaming and Internet addiction: When is playing no longer just fun and games? Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106989 Hamer, D. A. H., & Konijn, E. A. (2016). Can emotion regulation serve as a tool in combating cyberbullying? Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 1-6. Hardy, S. A., Bhattacharjee, A., Reed, A., & Aquino, K. (2010). Moral identity and psychological distance: The case of adolescent parental socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 33(1), 111-123. Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2014). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(8), 1542-1554. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. He, H. & Harris, L. (2014). Moral disengagement of hotel guest negative WOM: Moral identity centrality, moral awareness, and anger. Annals of Tourism Research, 45, 132-151. Hollister-Wagner, G. H., Foshee. V. A., & Jackson, C. (2001). Adolescent aggression: Models of resiliency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 445-466. Iranzo, B., Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2019). Cyberbullying, psychosocial adjustment, and suicidal ideation in adolescence. Psychosocial Intervention, 28(2), 75-81. Kessel-Schneider, S., O' Donnell, L., & Smith, E. (2015). Trends in cyberbullying and school bullying victimization in a regional census of high school students, 2006-2012.Journal of School Health, 85(9), 611-620. Kuo, C. -T., & Chiang, T. L. (2013). The association between relative deprivation and self-rated health, depressive symptoms, and smoking behavior in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 89, 39-44. Mishra, S., & Carleton, R. N. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 144-149. Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 219-230. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-249. Olweus, D., & Limber, S. P. (2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 139-143. Paciello, M., Tramontano, C., Nocentini, A., Fida, R., & Menesini, E. (2019). The role of traditional and online moral disengagement on cyberbullying: Do externalizing problems make any difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 190-198. Patrick, R. B., Bodine, A. J., Gibbs, J. C., & Basinger, K. S. (2018). What accounts for prosocial behavior? Roles of moral identity, moral judgment, and self-efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(5), 231-245. Runions, K. C., & Bak, M. (2015). Online moral disengagement, cyberbullying, and cyber aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 400-405. Runions, K. C., Shaw, T., Bussey, K., Thornberg, R., Salmivalli, C., & Cross, D. S. (2019). Moral disengagement of pure bullies and bully/victims: Shared and distinct mechanisms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(9), 1835-1848. Samnani, A. K., Salamon, S. D., & Singh, P. (2013). Negative affect and counterproductive workplace behavior: The moderating role of moral disengagement and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 235-244. Sakurai, K., Kawakami, N., Yamaoka, K., Ishikawa, H., & Hashimoto, H. (2010). The impact of subjective and objective social status on psychological distress among men and women in Japan. Social Science & Medicine, 70(11), 1832-1839. Shen, Y., Sun, X., & Xin, T. (2019). How social support affects moral disengagement: The role of anger and hostility. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(3), 1-9. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203-232. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. Stark, O. (2019). Relative deprivation as a cause of risky behaviors. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 44(3), 138-146. Stiles, B. L., Liu, X. R., & Kaplan, H. B. (2000). Relative deprivation and deviant adaptations: The mediating effects of negative self-feelings. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 64-90. VanGeel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 435-442. Wang, M.J., Yogeeswaran, K., Andrews, N. P., Hawi, D. R., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). How common is cyberbullying among adults? Exploring gender, ethnic, and age differences in the prevalence of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(11), 736-741. Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526. Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199-214. Wong, D. S. W., Chan, H. C.O., & Cheng, C. H. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140. Yao, M., Zhou, Y., Li, J., & Gao, X. (2019). Violent video games exposure and aggression: The role of moral disengagement, anger, hostility, and disinhibition. Aggressive Behavior, 45(6), 662-670. Yang, X., Wang, Z., Chen, H., & Liu, D. (2018). Cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese adolescents: The role of interparental conflict, moral disengagement, and moral identity. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 256-263. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189-195. Zhao, H. & Zhang, H. (2021). How personal relative deprivation influences moral disengagement: The role of malicious envy and Honesty-Humility. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 246-255. Zhao, H., Zhang, H. & Xu, Y. (2019). Effects of perceived descriptive norms on corrupt intention: The mediating role of moral disengagement. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 93-101. Zhang, J., & Tao, M. K. (2013). Relative deprivation and psychopathology of Chinese college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(3), 903-907. Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Tian, Y., Wei, H., Zhang, F., & Morrison, C. M. (2013). Cyberbullying and its risk factors among Chinese high school students. School Psychology International, 34(6), 630-647. 丁倩, 梁一冰, 张永欣, 黄凤. (2019). 低阶层大学生贫富归因对心理特权的影响: 相对剥夺感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 1041-1044. 丁倩, 唐云, 魏华, 张永欣, 周宗奎. (2018). 相对剥夺感与大学生网络游戏成瘾的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学报, 50(9), 1041-1050. 丁倩, 张永欣, 周宗奎. (2020). 相对剥夺感与大学生网络过激行为: 自我损耗的中介作用及性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 200-207. 范翠英, 张孟, 何丹. (2017). 父母控制对初中生网络欺负的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 516-519. 高峰强, 杨华勇, 耿靖宇, 韩磊. (2017). 相对剥夺感、负性生活事件在羞怯与攻击关系中的多重中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(2), 347-350. 胡荣, 林兆琦. (2020). “个人贫穷论”和反贫困——社会经济地位与主观阶层认同对贫困归因的影响. 江苏行政学院学报, (6), 53-60. 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. (2017). 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 道德推脱的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 605-613. 李伟, 李坤, 张庆春. (2016). 自恋与网络欺凌: 道德推脱的中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 4(11), 676-683. 联合国儿童基金会. (2019). 联合国新闻. 2019-09-04取自https://news.un.org/zh/story/2019/09/1040652 梁凤华. (2019). 网络欺凌普遍性信念与合理性信念对中学生网络欺凌的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用. 心理研究, 12(3), 278-285. 梁根林. (2017). 传统犯罪网络化: 归责障碍、刑法应对与教义限缩. 法学, (2), 3-13. 陈默, 梁建. (2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学报, 49(1), 94-105. 马皑. (2012). 相对剥夺感与社会适应方式: 中介效应和调节效应. 心理学报, 44(3), 377-387. 马晓辉, 雷雳. (2010). 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系. 心理学报, 42(10), 988-997. 宋明华, 刘燊, 朱转, 祝阳君, 韩尚锋, 张林. (2018). 相对剥夺感影响网络集群攻击行为: 一个有调节的双路径模型. 心理科学, 41(6), 1436-1442. 孙灯勇, 郭永玉. (2016). 相对剥夺感: 想得、应得、怨愤于未得. 心理科学, 39(3), 714-719. 田录梅, 潘月, 董鑫月, 孔莲. (2020). 不同社交网站使用与大学生抑郁的关系: 链式中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 36(6), 743-752. 王博晨, 金灿灿, 赵宝宝. (2020). 青少年家庭功能、人际适应和网络欺凌的关系: 一个有调节的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 469-476. 王兴超, 杨继平. (2010). 中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 177-179. 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726. 魏华, 周宗奎, 田媛, 鲍娜. (2012). 网络游戏成瘾: 沉浸的影响及其作用机制. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 651-657. 吴鹏, 王杨春子, 刘华山.(2019). 初中生网络欺负的发展趋势: 道德推脱、观点采择与共情关注的作用. 心理科学, 42(5), 1098-1105. 熊猛, 刘若瑾, 叶一舵. (2021). 单亲家庭儿童相对剥夺感与心理适应的循环作用关系: 一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 53(1), 67-80. 熊猛, 叶一舵. (2016). 相对剥夺感: 概念、测量、影响因素及作用. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 438-453. 许秀利. (2013). 大学生网络欺负现状及其与自尊、疏离感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 扬州大学. 杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2015). 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响: 道德认同的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 311-318. 杨继平, 王兴超, 杨力. (2014). 观点采择对大学生网络偏差行为的影响: 道德推脱的中介作用, 心理科学, 37(3), 633-638. 赵红丹, 周君. (2017). 企业伪善、道德推脱与亲组织非伦理行为: 有调节的中介效应. 外国经济与管理, 39(1), 15-28. 赵倩. (2018). 大学生道德认同与网络利他行为: 网络道德与性别的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(6), 1226-1229. 张红霞, 谢毅. (2008). 动机过程对青少年网络游戏行为意向的影响模型. 心理学报, 40(12), 1275-1286. 张锦涛, 陈超, 王玲娇, 刘璐, 刘凤娥, 赵会春,…方晓义. (2014). 大学新生网络使用时间与网络成瘾的关系: 有中介的调节模型. 心理学报, 46(10), 1521-1533. 郑清, 叶宝娟, 叶理丛, 郭少阳, 廖雅琼, 刘明矾. (2016). 道德推脱对大学生网络攻击的影响: 道德认同的中介作用与性别的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 714-716. 中国互联网络信息中心(2020). 第47次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 2021-02-03取自http://www.cac.gov.cn/2021-02/03/c_1613923423079314.htm 周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013). 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响: 公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 636-640. 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950. 朱丽娟, 彦廷鹤, 张守臣. (2021). 大学生被动性社交网站使用与抑郁的关系: 一项交叉滞后分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(1), 64-67. |
|
||
