CLC Number:
| [1] Dewey J.Experience and education.New York:MacMillan,1938,20. [2] Piaget J.To understand is to invent.New York:Grossman,1973. [3] Bruner J.On knowing:essays for the left hand.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1962,87. [4] Auanbel D P.Some psychological and educational limitations of learning by discovery.The Arithmetic Teacher,1964,11,290-302. [5] Friedlander B Z.A psyeholngist's second thoughts on concepts,curiosity,and discovery in teaching and learning.Harvard Educetional Review,1965,35,8-38. [6] Siegler R S.Three aspects of cognitive development.Cognitive Psychology,1976,8,481-520. [7] Siegler R S,Chon Z.Developmental differences in role learning:A microgenetic analysis.Cognitive Psychology,1998,36,273-310. [8] Mayer R E.Should there be a three-strikes role against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist,2004,59,14-19. [9] Bredderman T.Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes:A quantitative synthesis.Review of Educational Research,1983,53,499-518. [10] Schauble L.The development of scientific reasoning in knowledgerich contexts.Developmental Psychology,1996,32,102-119. [11] Stohr-Hunt P M.An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,1996,33,101-109. [12] McDaniel M A,Schinger M S.Discovery learning and tranafer of problem-solving skills.Cognition and Instruction,1990,7,129-159. [13] Klabr D,Nigam M.The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction:Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning.Psychological Science,2004,15,661-667. [14] Chen Z,Klabr D.All other things being equal:Acquisition and transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy.Child Development,1999,70,1098-1120. [15] Hardy I,Joncn A,Miller K,et al.Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students'understanding of "floating and finking."Journal of Educational Psychology,2006,98,307-326. [16] Rittle-Johoson B.Promoting transfer:Effects of self-explanatlon and direct instruction.Child Development,2006,77,1-15. [17] Toth E E,Kiabr D,Chen Z.Bridging research and practice:A cognitively based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children.Cognition & Instruction,2000,18,423-459. [18] Stemherg R J,Frensch P A.Mechanisms of transfer.In:Detterman D K,Sternberg R J.(Eds).Transfer on trial:Intelligence,cognition,and instruction.Westport,CT,US:Ahlex Publishing,1993,25-38. [19] Chon Z,Mo L.Schema induction in problem solving:A multidimensional analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2003,30,583-600. [20] Chi M T H,de Leenw N,Chiu M H,et al.Eliciting selfexplanations improves understanding,Cognitive Science,1994,18,439-477. [21] Honomichl R D,Chon Z.Learning to align relations:The effects of feedback and self-explanation.Journal of Cognition and Development,2006,7,527-550. [22] Siegler R S.Micrngenetic studies of self-explanation.In Granott N,Parziale J.(Eds.).Micrndevelopment:Transition processes in development and learning.New York,NY:Cambridge University Press,2002.31-58. [23] Schwartz D L,Moore J L.On the role of mathematics in explaining the material world:Mental models for proportional reasoning.Cognitive Science,1998,22,471-516. [24] Chon Z,Daehler M W.External and internal instantiation of abstract information facilitates transfer in insight problem solving.Contemporary Educational Psychology,2000,25,423-449. [25] Chen Z,Yanowitz K L,Daehler M W.Constraints on accessing abstract source information:lnstantiation of principles facilitates children's analogical transfer.Journal of Educational Psychology,1995,87,445-454. [26] Necdham D R,Begg I M.Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer:Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training.Meraory & Cognition,1991,19,543-557. [27] Blanchotte I,Dunbar K.Hew analogies are generated:The roles of structural and superficial similarity.Memory & Cognition,2000,28,108-124. [28] Dunbar K.The analogical paradox:Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory.In Gentner D,Holyoak K J.(Eds.).The analogical mind:Perspectives from cognitive science.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press,2001,313-334. |
|
||
