Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 641-647.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.06.01

    Next Articles

Effects of Mastery Degree and Social Cues on Metacognitive Monitoring and Control

JIA Ning1, RONG Lizhuo1, DAI Jinghua2   

  1. 1. College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024;
    2. Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050200
  • Published:2019-11-20

Abstract: Metacognitive monitoring and control is not only affected by the mastery degree of people's learning and memory, but also by social cues. In the present study, the effects of mastery degree and social cues on metacognitive monitoring (Experiment 1) and control (Experiment 2) were investigated. The mastery degree was based on whether the answer is correct or not, and the social cues provided the choice of "most people". The results show:Firstly, mastery degree and social cues independently influence metacognitive monitoring. Specifically, the higher the degree of mastery, the higher the level of confidence; Confidence levels are higher when individual choices are consistent with social cues. Secondly, the degree of mastery and social clues jointly influence metacognitive control. In particular, the higher the degree of mastery, the more individuals tend to stick to their initial choices. When the social cues are consistent with the initial choice of individuals, individuals tend to stick to their initial choice. Individuals tend to change their initial choices when they have a low level of mastery, and the social cues are inconsistent with individuals, they tend to be consistent with the majority of people. When the degree of mastery is low and the social clues are inconsistent with the individual, they tend to change their initial choice to be consistent with most people.

Key words: mastery degree, social cues, metacognitive monitoring and control

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Avhustiuk, M. M., Pasichnyk, I. D., & Kalamazh, R. V. (2018). The Illusion of Knowing in Metacognitive Monitoring:Effects of the Type of Information and of Personal, Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Individual Psychological Characteristics. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 317-341.
Brennan, A. A., & Enns, J. T. (2015). When two heads are better than one:interactive versus independent benefits of collaborative cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1076-1082.
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R.V.Kail, Jr & J.W. Hagen(Eds.). Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. New York:Halsted Press.
Gino, F., & Moore, D. A. (2010). Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(1), 21-35.
Hebart, M. N., Schriever, Y., Donner, T. H., & Haynes, J. D. (2016). The relationship between perceptual decision variables and confidence in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 118-130.
Koriat, A. (2017). Can People Identify "Deceptive" or "Misleading" Items that Tend to Produce Mostly Wrong Answers? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(5), 1066-1077.
Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 34-53.
Kostons, D., Gog, T. V., & Paas, F. (2009). How do i do? Investigating effects of expertise and performance-process records on self-assessment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1256-1265.
Król, M., Kilan-Banach, M., & Strzelecka, R. (2017). The role of stimulus predictability in the allocation of attentional resources:an eye-tracking study. Cognitive Processing(1), 1-8.
Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014). The wisdom of select crowds. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 107(2), 276-299.
Markus, P., Joelle, P., & Beate, S. (2013). Examining implicit metacognition in 3.5-year-old children:an eye-tracking and pupillometric study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(145),1-7.
Nelson, T., & Narens, L.. (1990). Metamemory:a theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 26, 125-173.
Niccolo, P., Geraint, R., & Bahador, B. (2016). The perceptual and social components of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(8), 949-965.
Pescetelli, N., Rees, G., & Bahrami, B. (2016). The perceptual and social components of metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(8), 949-965.
Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2010). Explicit and implicit confidence judgments and developmental differences in metamemory:an eye-tracking approach. Metacognition & Learning, 5(3), 229-250.
Roderer, T., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Can you see me thinking (about my answers)? Using eye-tracking to illuminate developmental differences in monitoring and control skills and their relation to performance. Metacognition & Learning, 9(1), 1-23.
Sanchez, C., & Dunning, D. (2018). Overconfidence among beginners:Is a little learning a dangerous thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,114(1):10-28
Schneider, W. (1998). Performance prediction in young children:effects of skill, metacognition and wishful thinking. Developmental Science, 1(2), 291-297.
Yaniv, I., & Milyavsky, M. (2007). Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 104-120.
Zawadzka, K., Higham, P. A., & Hanczakowski, M. (2017). Confidence in forced-choice recognition:What underlies the ratings? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(4), 552-564.
Zawadzka, K., Krogulska, A., Button, R., Higham, P. A., & Hanczakowski, M. (2016). Memory, metamemory, and social cues:between conformity and resistance. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145(2), 181-199.
贾宁, 白学军, 彭建国. (2011). 小学高年级学生学习判断的发展. 心理科学, 34(2), 402-406.
贾宁, 代景华. (2011). 元记忆监测错误的修正. 心理研究, 04(4), 49-56.
余柳涛, 鲍建樟, 陈清华, 王大辉. (2016). 个体自信度对双人决策的影响. 心理学报, 48(8), 1013-1025.
张笑, 冯廷勇.(2014). 决策信心在信息化从众中的作用.心理科学, 37(3), 689-693.
张振新, 明文.(2013). 间隔学习与测试对学习判断的影响. 心理科学, 36(3), 663-668.
[1] LIN Chongde. Need Is the Driver for Education and Development [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 1-7.
[2] LENG Xinyi, SU Mengmeng, LI Wenling, YANG Xiujie, XING Ailing, ZHANG Xianglin, SHU Hua. The Relation between Home Environment and Early Language Development in Rural China [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[3] CHEN Shuling, JIA Huibin, JIN Can, ZHANG Xin, WANG Enguo. Characteristics of Pre-attentive Processing of Visual Channels in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: Evidences from ERPs [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 19-28.
[4] XIE Heping, WANG Yanqing, WANG Fuxing, ZHOU Zongkui, DENG Sue, DUAN Zhaohui. Generative Drawing Effect in Memory and Its Boundary Conditions: A Meta-analysis [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 29-43.
[5] TIAN Huidong, ZHANG Yuhong, SUN Haoxiang, LI Ying, Hanixia. The Effect of Teacher-student Relationship on Social Competence with Peers for Students with Intellectual Disabilities: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[6] CHEN Qishan, HE Jingyi. Anger Congruence and Interpersonal Relationships in Female College Roommates: A Moderated Polynomial Regression Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 55-63.
[7] WANG Xinqiang, LI Jinwen, LU Hongyan, LAI Zhengwei, LI Jiayuan. The Influence of Advantages and Disadvantages of Mate Selection on Normal University Students’ Teacher Professional Identity: The Mediating Role of Perceived Mate Value and the Moderating Role of Self-esteem [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[8] ZHAO Jingwei, CHEN Xiaoxu, REN Liwen, GENG Zhe, XU Fuzhen. Parental Psychological Control and Children’s Anxiety: A Moderated Mediating Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[9] QIN Yao, PENG Yunshi. The Effect of Parenting Styles on Social Anxiety in Junior High School Students: The Chain Mediated Role of Rumination and Peer Acceptance [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[10] WEI Hua, DING Huimin, CHEN Wu, HAO Xingfeng, XIONG Jie. The Relationship between Parents’ Phubbing and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying: The Mediating Effects of Stress and the Moderating Effects of Age [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[11] FAN Xianglin, CUI Yingjin. The Relationship between Objectified Body Consciousness and Restrained Eating Behavior among Female College Students: The Mediating Roles of Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation and Sociocultural Pressure [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[12] ZHANG Huiru, ZHANG Weida, FU Wangqian, DENG Min, PENG Suhao, LI Yu. The Influence of Loneliness on Creative Inclination: Mediating Role of Boredom and Anxiety [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[13] WANG Yimeng, WANG Zhendong, WANG Fengyan. Solution to “Being in the Game”——A Mindfulness Intervention Study on Wisdom: The Role of Personal Growth Initiative and Reflection [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 142-152.
[14] JIN Xing, LIU Jinghong, MA Yue, YU Zhanyu. A Comparative Study on the Attentional Blink of Body Expression between Deaf and Normal Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 305-312.
[15] ZHONG Weifang, GUO Yongxing. Electrophysiological Evidence for the Lateralized Effect of Lexical Categories on Perception of Facial Expression [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!