Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 112-120.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.01.13
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHAI Huanyou1, CHEN Chunyu2, DUAN Changying2, ZHU Caifeng3, SUN Xiaojun2
CLC Number:
Ahn, J. (2012). Teenagers' experiences with social network sites:Relationships to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society, 28(2), 99-109. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park:Sage. Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49. Banjanin, N., Banjanin, N., Dimitrijevic, I., & Pantic, I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression:Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 308-312. Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent well-being:A systematic narrative review. Children & Youth Services Review, 41(1), 27-36. Bullguard Internet Security. (2011). More than half of parents snoop on their children's online activity. Retrieved November 11, from http://www.bullguard.com/news/latest-press-releases/press-release-archive/2011-07-12.aspx Burke, M. (2012). How families interact on Facebook. Retrieved November 11, from http://www.Facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-science/how-familiesinteract-on-facebook/10151208188528859?utm_source=Labnotes+Newsletter&utm_campaign=b12bf56f38-Labnotes&utm_medium=email Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks:Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343. Collins, W. A., & Steinberg, L. (2007). Adolescent Development in Interpersonal Context. Handbook of Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Day, R. D., Harper, J., & Stockdale, L. (2014). A friend request from dear old dad:Associations between parent-child social networking and adolescent outcomes. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 17(1), 8-13. De Goede, I. H. A. D., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009). Developmental changes in adolescents' perceptions of relationships with their parents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 75-88. Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster model of family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family therapy, 4(4), 19-31. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends":Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. Eurostat (2016). Being young in Europe today-digital world. Retrieved November 11, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Being_young_in_Europe_today_-_digital_world Feng, Y., & Xie, W. (2014). Teens' concern for privacy when using social networking sites:An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 153-162. Fox, J., Moreland, J. J., Fox, J., & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites:An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 168-176. Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents' depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153-171. Galvin, K. M., Dickson, F. C., & Marrow, S. R. (2006). Systems theory:Patterns and (w) holes in family communication. In Engaging theories in family communication:Multiple perspectives. SAGE Publications Inc. Goossens, L. (2013). Affinity for aloneness in adolescence and preference for solitude in childhood. The Handbook of Solitude:Psychological Perspectives on Social Isolation, Social Withdrawal, and Being Alone. John Wiley & Sons. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling[White paper]. URL:http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/statswiki/FAQ/SobelTest. Hofer, M., & Aubert, V. (2013). Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter:Differentiating between followers and followees. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2134-2142. Johnson, G., & Puplampu, K. (2008). A conceptual framework for understanding the effect of the Internet on child development:The ecological techno-subsystem. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34, 19-28. Klein M. (2012). Teens, parents face off over Facebook. Retrived August December 17, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-01-22/facebook-parents-teens/52743092/1. Ko, H., & Kuo, F. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 75-79. Lamm, E. M., & Brubaker, T. H. (2008). Family Communication:Cohesion and Change 7 book paperback (limp). Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21(5), 3817-3824. Lee, E., Kim, Y. J., & Ahn, J. (2014). How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital? Computers in Human Behavior, 36 (2), 440-445. Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014). Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 38(3), 213-219. Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old:Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112. Neves, B. B., & Fonseca, J. R. S. (2015). Latent Class Models in action:Bridging social capital & Internet usage. Social Science Research, 50(2), 15-30. Noller, P., & Callan, V. J. (1990). Adolescents' perceptions of the nature of their communication with parents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19(4), 349-362. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-Speed family connection:Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone:The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 788-790. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale:A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement, 1(3), 385-401. Ramirez Jr, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline:The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287-310. Selfhout, M. H., Branje, S. J., Delsing, M., ter Bogt, T. F., & Meeus, W. H. (2009). Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety:The role of perceived friendship quality. Journal of adolescence, 32(4), 819-833. Smetana, J. G., Campionebarr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 255-284. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks:Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420-433. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being:Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169-1182. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2015). Media effects:theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 315-338. Van den Eijnden, R. J., Meerkerk, G. J., Vermulst, A. A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents:A longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 44(3), 655-665. Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Gaskin, J., & Wang, H. Z. (2014). The effects of Social Networking Site (SNS) use on college students' friendship and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 229-236. Xie, W. (2014). Social network site use, mobile personal talk and social capital among teenagers. Computers in Human Behavior, 41(1), 228-235. Yu, S., Clemens, R., Yang, H., Li, X., Stanton, B., & Deveaux, L., et al. (2006). Youth and parental perceptions of parental monitoring and parent-adolescent communication, youth depression, and youth risk behaviors. Social Behavior & Personality:An International Journal, 34(10), 1297-1310. 方晓义, 戴丽琼, 房超, 邓林园. (2006). 亲子沟通问题与青少年社会适应的关系. 心理发展与教育, 22(3), 47-52. 方晓义, 徐洁, 孙莉, 张锦涛. (2004). 家庭功能:理论、影响因素及其与青少年社会适应的关系. 心理科学进展, 12(4), 544-553. 葛红宁, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 陈武. (2016). 社交网站使用能带来社会资本吗. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 454-463. 郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. (2014). 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系:基本心理需要满足的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 129-136. 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. (2017). 社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系:一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异. 心理学报, 49(7), 941-952. 牛更枫, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 孔繁昌, 田媛. (2016). 基于QQ空间的社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较和自尊的序列中介作用. 心理学报,48(10), 1282-1291. 沈赟. (2014). 父母的媒介互动行为与亲子沟通研究. 科技传播, 19, 13-15. 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726. 闫景蕾, 武俐, 孙萌, 崔娟, 梁清. (2016). 社交网站使用对抑郁的影响:线上社会资本的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(2), 317-320. 杨晓辉, 王腊梅, 朱莉琪. (2014). 电子媒体的使用与儿童发展——基于生态科技微系统理论的视角. 心理科学, 37(4), 920-924. 谢笑春, 雷雳, 牛更枫. (2016). 青少年网络自我表露与抑郁:社会支持的性别效应. 心理科学, 39(5), 1144-1150. 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(5), 757-769. 杨晓辉, 王腊梅, 朱莉琪. (2014). 电子媒体的使用与儿童发展——基于生态科技微系统理论的视角. 心理科学, 37(4), 920-924. 杨秀娟, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. (2017). 社交网站积极自我呈现与青少年抑郁:链式中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 489-493. 中国互联网络信息中心. (2018). 《第41次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. 来自http://wemedia.ifeng.com/47416260/wemedia.shtml 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950. 周宗奎, 连帅磊, 田媛, 牛更枫, 孙晓军. (2017). 社交网站使用与青少年生活满意度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 297-305. |
|