心理发展与教育 ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 43-46.

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

高二学生阅读插图课文的即时加工研究

陶云, 申继亮   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2003-04-15 发布日期:2003-04-15
  • 作者简介:陶云(1965- ),男,北京师范大学发展心理研究所博士后.tyun@eyou.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科“十五”规划重点项目(ABA010011);国家社科“十五”规划青年重点项目(CBA010122)

The Immediate Processing Study on Reading Picture Texts forGrade 11 Students

TAO Yun, SHEN Ji-liang   

  1. Instith of Deuelopmental psychology, Bejing Normal University 100875
  • Online:2003-04-15 Published:2003-04-15

摘要: 采用ASL4200R型眼动仪,对28名高二年级学生阅读插图课文的阅读理解特点进行研究,结果表明:(1)高二学生阅读不同呈现方式课文的阅读成绩和阅读时间,以及注视次数、注视点持续时间和回视次数,插图课文显著优于无图课文.插图对课文的阅读理解具有明显的促进作用;(2)高二学生阅读不同难度课文的阅读成绩和阅读时间,以及注视次数和回视次数,易课文显著优于难课文.

关键词: 阅读, 插图, 即时加工, 眼动

Abstract: Using Model 42008 Eye View Monitoring Systems,the present study investigated reading comprehension indexes and eye-rmvement indexes on reading picture texts.There are 28 subjects from Grade 11.What the experimental results suggests are as follows:Firstly,during the Grade 11 students read the texts which were presented by different manners,their reading scores and reading time,as well as fixation times and regressive times,the picture texts are much better than the non-picture texts,and the difference is significant.This result suggested that the reading comprehension improved for using the picture;Seco ndly,the C3rade 11 students read the texts which are different difficult levels,as for as reading scores and reading time,as well as fixation times and regressive times,the easier texts are much better than the more difficult ones.And the difference is also significant.

Key words: picture, immediate processing, eye rmvement

[1] 沈德立,陶云.初中生有无插图课文的眼动过程研究.心理科学,2001,24(4):385-388.
[2] Rayner K, Pollatsek A. Eye movements and scene perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1992,46:342-376.
[3] Henderson J M, McClure K K, Pierce S, Schrock G. Object identification without foveal vision: Evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 1997,59: 323-346.
[4] Donald D R. The use and value of pictures as contextual information for readers at different process and developmental levels, 1983;53: 175-185.
[5] Paivio A, Csapo K. Picture superiority effect in free recall:Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 1973; 5: 176-206.
[6] Just M A, Carpenter P A. The intensity dimension of thought:pupillometrie indicates of sentence processing, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1993,47(2): 310-339.
[7] Rayner K. Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading,visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge(Eds), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, Processes and applications. Amsterdam: North Holland. 1995:3-22.
[8] Van Diepen P M, DeGraef P, d' Ydewalle G. Chronometry of foveal information extraction during scene perception. In J. M. Findlay,R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement reseacher:Mechanisms, Processes and applications Amsterdam: North Holland.1995: 349-362.
[9] Rothkopf E Z. Analyzing eye movements to infer processing styles during learning from text. In J. W. Senders. D. F. Fisher, & R.A. Monty (Eds).Eye movements and the higher psychological functions.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1978:209-224.
[10] Kintsch W, van Dijk T A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 1978,85:363-394.
[1] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[3] 王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[4] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[5] 王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[6] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[7] 郑婉婷, 王薇, 徐利敏, 李莫涵, 徐芝琦, 李永鑫, 赵静, 梁紫嫣, 刘靖佳. 5~7岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童环境文字阅读的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 822-829.
[8] 张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[9] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[10] 张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[11] 于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[12] 周婷娜, 李宜逊, 李虹, 徐钟庚, 张锋, 程亚华. 汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[13] 施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[14] 马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[15] 孟红霞, 白学军, 谭珂, 苏娟. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉拥挤效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 762-768.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!