应对风格问卷的初步编制

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究提出一种关于应对风格的理论构想。根据此构想编制的应对风格问卷可将个体分为灵活应对、问题应对、情绪应对和异常应对四种应对风格。初步研究表明,此问卷具有较好的信度和效度。用此问卷对1115名被试进行了初步调查,发现灵活应对风格160人,问题应对风格420人,情绪应对风格394人,异常应对风格的141人。此量表的建立为我们今后进行压力与应对的研究提供了一个有效工具。

关键词: 应对风格, 灵活应对, 应激

Abstract: The research has brought forward one theory about coping style.The Coping Style Questionnaire newly developed according to the theory can divide individuals into four coping styles,including flexible coping style,problem coping style,emotion coping style and abnormal coping style.The preliminary research indicates that the questionmire has good reliability and validity.1115 subjects have been surveyed using the questionnaire.The results showed 160 subjects of flexible coping style,420 subjects of problem coping style,394 subjects of emotion coping style and 141 abnormal coping style.The development of the questionnaire offers one valid tool for our stress and coping research in the future.

Key words: coping style, flexible coping, stress

石林, 封丹珺. 应对风格问卷的初步编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(1): 79-82.

SHI Lin, FENG Dan-jun. The Development Of the Coping Style Questionaire[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2004, 20(1): 79-82.

参考文献

[1] Somefield M R, McCrae R R. Stress and coping research:methedological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications.American Psychologist,2000,55(6):620-625.
[2] Lazarus R S, Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York:Springer, 1999.
[3] Lazarus R S, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984.
[4] Stone A A, Neale J M. New measure of daily coping: development and preliminary results. Journal of personality and social psychology,1984,46:892-906
[5] 姜乾金,黄丽,卢抗生等.心理应激:应对的分类与身心健康.中国心理卫生杂志,19993,7(4):145-147.
[6] 肖计划,许秀峰.应付方式问卷效度和信度研究.中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):164-168.
[7] 韦有华,汤盛钦.COPE量表的初步修订.心理学报,1996,28(4):380-387.
[8] 梁宝勇,郭倩玉,杜桂芝.关于应付的一些思考与实证研究:Ⅱ.应付方式的评定、分类与估价.中国临床心理学杂志,1999,7(4):200-203.
[9] 施承孙,董燕,侯玉波等.应付方式量表的初步编制.心理学报,2002,34(4):414-420.
[10] Folkman S,Lazarus R S, Gruen R J. et al. Appraisal,coping,health status,and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,50:571-579.
[11] Schwartz J E,Neale J,Marco C. et al. Does trait coping exist?A momentary assessent approcach to the evaluation of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999,77 (2): 360-369.
[12] Lazarus R S, Folkman S. If it changes it must be a process:Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a colleage examination.Journal of personality and social psychology, 1985,48: 150-170.
[13] Terry D J. Determinants of coping: the role of stable and situational factors. Journal of personality and social psychology,1994,66: 895-910.
[14] Bolger N,Zuckerman A. A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of personality and social psychology,1995,69,890-902.
[15] David J P,Suls J. Coping efforts in daily life: role of big five traits and problem appraisals. Journal of personality, 1999,67: 265-294.
[16] Koeske G F,Kirk S A. Coping with job stress: which strategies work best? Journal of occupational & Organizational psychology,1993,66(4):p319-336.
[17] Tennen H,Affleck G,Armeli S. et al. A daily process approach to coping: linking theory,research,and practice. American Psychologist,2000,55(6):626-636.
[18] Cheng C. Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings:a mutimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social psycholoty,2001,80(5):814-833.
[19] 汪向东等.心理卫生评定量表手册.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999
[20] 粱宝勇.应对研究的成果、问题与解决办法.心理学报,2002,34(6):643-650.
[21] Cheng C.Cognitive and motivational process underlying coping flexibility: a dual-process model. Journal of personality and social psychology,2003,84(2):425-438.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘艾祎, 王文超, 伍新春. 青少年的自我同情对创伤后应激障碍与创伤后成长的影响:感恩的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 859-868.
[2]	傅雪薇, 孙佳宁, 肖家乐, 王浩森, 林丹华. 父母感知的家庭压力对儿童问题行为的影响：父母心理攻击和儿童应激下皮质醇反应的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 635-647.
[3]	王晓蕾, 陈丽华, 卜钰, 林丹华. 父子依恋、母子依恋与儿童应激下皮质醇反应的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 10-20.
[4]	伍新春, 王文超, 周宵, 陈秋燕, 林崇德. 汶川地震8.5年后青少年身心状况研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 80-89.
[5]	陈光辉, 孔艳红. 特里尔社会应激测验对儿童皮质醇分泌的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 532-538.
[6]	陈禹, 车先伟, 关丽丽, 许晓璠, 赵玉芳, 杨娟. 急性心理性应激对自我参照记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 41-48.
[7]	李仁莉, 戴艳, 林崇德, 伍新春. 中学生创伤后成长、创伤后应激障碍的发展趋势:心理复原力的预测效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 728-737.
[8]	伍新春, 周宵, 陈杰灵, 曾旻. 主动反刍、创伤后应激障碍与创伤后成长的关系:一项来自汶川地震后青少年的长程追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 334-341.
[9]	伍新春, 周宵, 林崇德, 陈杰灵. 青少年创伤后心理反应的影响机制及其干预研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 117-127.
[10]	陈禹, 任国防, 李海江, 杨瑜, 关丽丽, 胡新雨, 杨娟. 自尊与心理性应激反应的关系：社会认可需求的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 435-441.
[11]	陈杰灵, 伍新春, 曾盼盼, 周宵, 熊国钰. PTSD与PTG的关系：来自教师群体的追踪研究证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 75-81.
[12]	戴艳, 雷鸣, 周宵, 姚梅, 蒋林洁, 陈希, 刘瑶. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 61-67.
[13]	伍新春, 张宇迪, 林崇德, 臧伟伟. 中小学生的灾难暴露程度对创伤后应激障碍的影响：中介和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 641-648.
[14]	林崇德, 伍新春, 张宇迪, 臧伟伟, 周宵, 戴艳. 汶川地震30个月后中小学生的身心状况研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 631-640.
[15]	程科, 周宵, 陈秋燕, 张晨光, 伍新春. 小学生创伤后应激障碍对攻击行为的影响：应对方式的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 649-656.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed