面孔再认及学习程度判断中的同龄效应

心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 271-275.

面孔再认及学习程度判断中的同龄效应

刘希平¹, 唐乐¹, 唐卫海²

1. 天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074

出版日期:2012-05-15 发布日期:2012-05-15
通讯作者: 唐卫海,E-mail:twhpsy@126.com E-mail:twhpsy@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJAXLX021;11YJA190015);第41批留学回国项目;天津市教育科学十二五重点规划项目(CE2016)

The Own-Age Effect in Face Recognition and Judgments of Learning

LIU Xi-ping¹, TANG Le¹, TANG Wei-hai²

1. College of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Online:2012-05-15 Published:2012-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 同龄效应指个体对自己年龄段面孔的记忆成绩显著高于其他年龄面孔.实验采用3×3混合设计,考察不同年龄被试对面孔再认及学习程度判断中的同龄效应,探讨同龄效应的发展规律.结果显示,青年和老年人对同龄面孔的再认显著好于异龄面孔,儿童对同龄与异龄面孔的再认成绩差异不显著;各组被试对不同年龄的面孔学习程度判断准确性之间的差异没有区别.这表明:青年和老年人在面孔再认中出现了同龄效应,儿童没有表现出同龄效应;个体学习程度判断中不存在同龄效应,且这种特点与年龄无关.

关键词: 面孔再认, 学习程度判断, 同龄效应, 儿童, 青年, 老年

Abstract: The own-age effect refers to a phenomenon that individuals show superior performance in identifying faces of their own age when compared with other-age faces.Based on 3(age of participants)×3(age of faces) mixed factors design,the experiment aims to explore the ability of individuals at different ages recognizing their own-age and other-age faces and influence of the own-age effect on judgments of learning.The results showed both young and older adults recognized own-age faces more accurately than other-age faces,however,this performance did not appear in children group;there was no significant difference among groups in the discrepancy of accuracy of judgments of learning for the own-age and other-age faces.These results indicated young and older adults but children showed the own-age effect when they recognize the faces of different ages.No own-age effect in the judgments of learning was found in the present experimental situation.

Key words: face recognition, judgments of learning, own-age effect, children, young adults, older adults

中图分类号:

B844.1

刘希平, 唐乐, 唐卫海. 面孔再认及学习程度判断中的同龄效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 271-275.

LIU Xi-ping, TANG Le, TANG Wei-hai. The Own-Age Effect in Face Recognition and Judgments of Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(3): 271-275.

参考文献

[1] Anastasi,J.S.,& Rhodes,M.G.(2005).An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults.Psychonomic Bulletin &Review,12(6),1043-1047.
[2] Bckman,L.(1991).Recognition memory across the adult life span:The role of prior knowledge.Memory & Cognition,19,63-71.
[3] Fulton,A.,& Bartlett,J.C.(1991).Young and old faces in young and old heads:The factor of age in face recognition.Psychology and Aging,6(4),623-630.
[4] Havard,C.,& Memon,A.(2009).The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up:A comparison between older and younger adults.Memory,17(8),847-859.
[5] Hills,P.J.,& Lewis,M.B.(2011).The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,64,(1),17-23.
[6] Koriat,A.(1997).Monitoring one's own knowledge during study:A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,126(4),349-370.
[7] Lamont,A.C.,Stuart-Williams,S.,& Podd,J.(2005).Face recognition and aging:Effects of target age and memory load.Memory & Cognition,33(6),1017-1024.
[8] Perfect,T.J.,& Harris,L.J.(2003).Adult age differences in unconscious transference:Source confusion or identity blending?Memory & Cognition,31(4),570-580.
[9] Sommer,W.,Heinz,A.,Leuthold,H.,Matt,J.,& Schweinberger,S.R.(1995).Metamemory,distinctiveness,and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces.Memory & Cognition,23(1),1-11.
[10] Sporer.S.L.(2001).Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups:an integration of theories.Psychology,Public Policy,and Law,7(1),36-97.
[11] Wright,D.B.,& Stroud,J.N.(2002).Age differences in lineup identification accuracy:People are better with their own age.Law and Human Behavior,26(6),641-654.
[12] 陈功香,傅小兰.(2004).学习判断及其准确性.心理科学进展,12(2),176-184.
[13] 刘希平.(2001).回溯性监测判断与预见性监测判断发展的比较研究.心理学报,33(2),137-141.
[14] 刘希平,唐卫海.(2002).回忆准备就绪的判断的发展.心理学报,34(1),56-60.
[15] 兰公瑞,刘成刚,盖笑松.(2011).面孔识别的认知发展机制.心理科学,34(5),1120-1123.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	余林伟, 李爽, 刘燊, 潘文沛, 徐强, 张林. 老年人模糊表情识别的积极效应及其机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 196-206.
[5]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[6]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[7]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[8]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[9]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[10]	张弘弛, 毛伟宾, 崔慧园, 安姝, 李庆元. 价值对老年人项目记忆和联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 625-634.
[11]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[12]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[13]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[14]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[15]	林瑶, 张宝山, 徐冉, 张何雅婷. 老年人睡眠质量与家人沟通质量的关系及其影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 200-209.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed