心理发展与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 512-524.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.04.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    

是在“卷”我吗?大学生学业零和信念影响对他人努力的解读及其后果

唐凤华, 翟予童, 李家瑶, 王芳   

  1. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学), 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2026-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 王芳 E-mail:fwang@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    科技创新2023(2021ZD0200500)。

Is It a Rat Race? How College Students’ Academic Zero-sum Beliefs Influence the Interpretation of Others’ Academic Efforts and Its Consequences

TANG Fenghua, ZHAI Yutong, LI Jiayao, WANG Fang   

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2026-07-04

摘要: 为揭示“内卷”现象及激烈学业竞争背后的心理机制,本研究通过两项研究(共三个子研究,N=571)探讨了大学生的学业零和信念(对“一个人的学业成功意味着另一个人的学业失败”的认同程度)如何影响其对同伴努力行为的解读(以超越他人为目的的竞争解读或以提高自身为目的的发展解读),以及解读方式带来的情绪与行为后果。研究1的问卷调查发现,大学生个体持有的学业零和信念越强,越倾向于对他人的学业努力行为做出竞争而非发展解读。研究2通过实验法进一步验证了二者的因果关系,即在启动高学业零和信念后,个体更倾向于将他人的学业努力行为视为以超越他人而非提高自身为目的,进而产生了更高水平的学业焦虑(研究2a)与过度努力行为(研究2b)。总体而言,本研究揭示了学业零和信念、对他人努力的解读方式是引发激烈学业竞争的重要认知性因素,且对他人努力的竞争性解读是连接学业零和信念与学业焦虑、过度努力等不良后果的关键心理机制,这些发现可以为改善教育环境和促进学生心理健康提供参考。

关键词: 竞争, 零和信念, 努力, 学业焦虑, 内卷

Abstract: To uncover the psychological mechanisms underlying the phenomenon of “involution” and intense academic competition, the present research conducted two studies (comprising three sub-studies, N=571) to examine how undergraduates’ academic zero-sum beliefs (i.e., the extent to which one endorses the idea that one student’s academic success necessarily means another student’s failure) shape their interpretations of others’ academic efforts (aiming at surpassing others or improving themselves), as well as the emotional and behavioral consequences of such interpretations. Study 1 preliminarily found that the stronger the academic zero-sun beliefs held by individuals, the more they tended to interpret peers’ academic efforts as competitive attempts to surpass others rather than as efforts aimed at self-improvement. Study 2 employed experimental methods to examine the causal relationships between academic zero-sum beliefs and the interpretation of others’ efforts. Specifically, after being primed with high academic zero-beliefs, participants were more likely to view peers’ academic efforts as aiming at surpassing others rather than improving themselves. This interpretation, in turn, led to higher levels of academic anxiety (Study 2a) and over-effort behaviors (Study 2b). Overall, the present research identifies academic zero-sum beliefs and interpretations of others’ efforts as key cognitive factors driving intense academic competition, and highlights that competitive interpretations serve as a crucial psychological mechanism linking zero-sum beliefs with adverse outcomes such as academic anxiety and over-effort. These findings shed light on psychological processes underlying intense academic competition, providing insights for improving the educational environment and promoting students’ mental health.

Key words: competition, zero-sum belief, effort, academic anxiety, involution

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Adamska, K., Jurek, P., & Rózycka-Tran, J. (2015). The mediational role of relational psychological contract in belief in a zero-sum game and work input attitude dependency.Polish Psychological Bulletin,46(4), 579-586.
Adler, Epel, E. S.,Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology,19(6), 586-592.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Ames, D. R. (2004). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 573-585.
Andrews-Fearon, P., & Davidai, S. (2023). Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people’s preference for dominance but not prestige. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,152(2), 389-409.
Berg, L. D.,Huijbens, E. H., & Larsen, H. G. (2016). Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer, 60(2), 168-180.
Celniker, G. A., Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. F. (2023). The moralization of effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,152(1), 60-79.
Chen, S.-W. (2023). Learning motivations and effort beliefs in Confucian cultural context: A dual-mode theoretical framework of achievement goal. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1058456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1058456
Cheng, L., Hao, M., & Wang, F. (2021). Beware of the 'bad guys’: Economic inequality, perceived competition, and social vigilance. International Review of Social Psychology,34(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.497
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Davidai, S. (2022). “Do not teach them how to fish”: The effect of zero-sum beliefs on help giving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,151(10), 2466-2480.
Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231.
Collie, Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Papworth, B. (2017). Academic buoyancy mediates academic anxiety’s effects on learning strategies: An investigation of English- and Chinese-speaking Australian students.Educational Psychology,37(8), 947-964.
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T. (2019). The impact of a competitive learning environment on hormonal and emotional stress responses and skill acquisition and expression in a medical student domain. Physiology & Behavior,199, 252-257.
Davidai, S. (2025). Economic Inequality Fosters the Belief That Success Is Zero-Sum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(6), 1030-1046.
Davidai, S., & Tepper, S. J. (2023). The psychology of zero-sum beliefs. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(8), 472-482.
Davidai, S., & Ongis, M. (2019). The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game. Science Advances,5(12), eaay3761. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3761
Duckworth, P., C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(6), 1087-1101.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House Z.
Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M.t., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health,58(4), 637-642.
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues,57(3), 389-412.
Faul, F.,Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39(2), 175-191.
Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive Dissonance.Scientific American,207(4), 93-106.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R.J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992-1003.
Genge, O., & Day, M. V. (2021). Explaining support for post-secondary educational funding for indigenous students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement,53(3), 304-314.
González-Valero, G., Zurita-Ortega, F.,Ubago-Jiménez, J. L., & Puertas-Molero, P. (2019). Use of meditation and cognitive behavioral therapies for the treatment of stress, depression and anxiety in students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4394. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224394
Heider, F.(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Hodge, B., Wright, B., & Bennett, P. (2020). Balancing effort and rewards at university: Implications for physical health, mental health, and academic outcomes. Psychological Reports, 123(4), 1240-1259.
Huang, S., Lin, S. C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). When individual goal pursuit turns competitive: How we sabotage and coast.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,117(3), 605-620.
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,22(4), 337-349.
Jiga-Boy, G. M., Toma, C., & Corneille, O. (2014). Work more, then feel more: The influence of effort on affective predictions.PLoS ONE,9(7), 101512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.010 1512
Juvonen, J., & Murdock, T. B. (1993). How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and achievement outcome on publicly communicated attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology,85(2), 365-376.
Juvonen, J. (2000). The social functions of attributional face-saving tactics among early adolescents. Educational Psychology Review,12(1), 15-32.
Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,30, 163-240.
Krueger, J. I. (2003). Return of the ego—Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review,110, 585-590.
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L., & Altermatt, T. W. (2004). The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 91-98.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping.European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141-169.
Li, G., Li, Z., Wu, X., & Zhen, R. (2022). Relations between class competition and primary school students’ academic achievement: Learning anxiety and learning engagement as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology,13, 775213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.775 213
Meegan, D. V. (2010). Zero-sum bias: Perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 00191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191
Mehrsafar, A. H., Strahler, J.,Gazerani, P., Khabiri, M., Sánchez, J. C. J., Moosakhani, A., & Zadeh, A. M. (2019). The effects of mindfulness training on competition-induced anxiety and salivary stress markers in elite Wushu athletes: A pilot study. Physiology & Behavior,210, 112655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112655
Muller, D., & Fayant, M.-P. (2010). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 621-634.
Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative games.Annals of Mathematics,54(2), 286-295.
Ongis, M., & Davidai, S. (2022). Personal relative deprivation and the belief that economic success is zero-sum. Journal of Experimental Psychology,151(7), 1666-1680.
Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Büki, N.,Ivaskevics, K., Böthe, B., & Fülöp, M. (2018). The four faces of competition: The development of the multidimensional competitive orientation inventory. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 00779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00779
Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stresson students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104-112.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist,37(2), 91-105.
Posselt, J. R., & Lipson, S. K. (2016). Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study. Journal of College Student Development, 57(8), 973-989.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & La Prelle, J. (1985). Social comparison after success and failure: Biased searchfor information consistent with self-servicing conclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,21(2), 195-211.
Reese, Z. A., Garcia, S. M., & Edelstein, R. S. (2022). More than a game: Trait competitiveness predicts motivation in minimally competitive contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111262
Roberts, R., & Davidai, S. (2022). The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 559-575.
Roczniewska, M., & Wojciszke, B. (2021). Reducing hindering job demands: The role of belief in life as a zero-sum game and workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,18(19), 10036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910036
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,13(3), 279-301.
Rovan, D., NinaPavlinBernardic, & Vesna VlahovicŠtetic. (2011). The role of competence beliefs, task value, and achievement goals in predicting mathematics anxiety. In 14th Biennial EARLI Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction “Education for a Global Networked Society”. Exeter, Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo: Croatia Scientific Library.
Rózycka-Tran, J., Boski, P., & Wojciszke, B. (2015). Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,46(4), 525-548.
Rózycka-Tran, J., Jurek, P., Olech, M., Piotrowski, J., & Zemojtel-Piotrowska, M. (2019). A warrior society: Data from 30 countries show that belief in a zero-sum game is related to military expenditure and low civil liberties. Frontiers in Psychology,9, 02645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02645
Rózycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J. P., Zemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Jurek, P., Osin, E. N., Adams, B. G., … Maltby, J. (2021). Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Current Psychology,40(7), 3575-3584.
Ryckman, R. M., Thornton, B., & Gold, J. A. (2009). Assessing competition avoidance as a basic personality dimension.The Journal of Psychology, 143(2), 175-192.
Schelling, T. C. (1958). The strategy of conflict: Prospectus for a reorientation of game theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution,2(3), 203-264.
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought.Perspectives on Psychological Science,3(2), 102-116.
Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,29(8), 209-269.
Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,1(1), 27-41.
Smithson, M., & Shou, Y. (2016). Asymmetries in responses to attitude statements: The example of “zero-sum” beliefs.Frontiers in Psychology,7, 00984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00984
Tippin, G. K., Lafreniere, K. D., & Page, S. (2012). Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort.Active Learning in Higher Education,13(1), 51-61.
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, N., Lenski, A., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2015). Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: Additive, synergistic, or compensatory effects?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,109(1), 142-162.
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., Babbitt, L. G.,Toosi, N. R., & Schad, K. D. (2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,57, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.008
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D.,Toosi, N. R., Miller, C. A., Lisnek, J. A., & Martin, L. A. (2022). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians?: Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,122(1), 73-101.
Wittmann, M. K., Kolling, N., Faber, N. S., Scholl, J., Nelissen, N., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2016). Self-other mergence in the frontal cortex during cooperation and competition.Neuron,91(2), 482-493.
Wong, Y. J., Klann, E. M., Bijelic, N., & Aguayo, F. (2017). The link between men’s zero-sum gender beliefs and mental health: Findings from Chile and Croatia. Psychology of Men & Masculinities,18(1), 12-19.
Zhang, M., Andersson, B., & Wang, F. (2021). Are competitive people less altruistic and more manipulative? Associations among subtypes of competitiveness, hypothetical altruism, and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences,181, 111037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111037
Zizzo, D. J., & Tan, J. H. W. (2011). Game harmony: A behavioral approach to predicting cooperation in games.American Behavioral Scientist,55(8), 987-1013.
崔娜, 刘云艳, 高变英. (2008). 高中生成就目标、考试焦虑与学业成绩的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志,16(4), 436-438.
胡玉芬. (2014). 大学生竞争态度与焦虑的关系研究. 社会心理科学,7, 38-41.
王汪帅, 易颜熙, 罗芷薇, 厉杰. (2024). 内卷还是躺平?竞争压力如何影响心理补偿. 心理科学进展, 32(7), 1057-1072.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
赵以诺. (2021). 资源稀缺性对过度努力的影响(硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
[1] 魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[2] 邢淑芬, 白荣, 刘霞, 李森. 母亲拒绝与多巴胺基因对学前儿童外化问题的联合作用:努力控制的近端机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 518-527.
[3] 肖雪, 李燕芳. 群体竞争对儿童公平分配行为的影响:群体偏见动机的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 792-807.
[4] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[5] 康丹, 郭炀炀, 陈杰, 蔡术, 张颖杰, 曹诗悦. 分配对象和分配情境对4~6岁幼儿分配行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 609-616.
[6] 姚琳, 刘福会, 李伟强, 张晓琪, 袁博. 能力社会比较与归因反馈对不诚实行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[7] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[8] 王明忠, 王静, 王保英, 曲西茜, 辛福康. 粗暴养育与青少年学业成绩:有调节的中介分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 67-76.
[9] 王笑楠, 郝洋, 苏彦捷. 竞争和合作对学龄前儿童分配模式的影响:心理理论和抑制控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 385-392.
[10] 孙钾诒, 刘衍玲. 非暴力视频游戏中竞争情境对玩家合作倾向和攻击倾向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 32-39.
[11] 王明忠, 王梦然, 王静. 父母冲突损害青少年学业成绩:努力控制与课堂参与的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
[12] 梁宗保, 张安慰, 张光珍, 宋媛, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. 父母婚姻质量与儿童行为问题的追踪研究:儿童努力控制的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 525-532.
[13] 梁宗保, 孙铃, 张光珍, 陈会昌, 张萍. 父亲情绪表达与儿童社会适应:气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 351-358.
[14] 邢淑芬, 俞国良, 林崇德. 小学高年级儿童的内隐智力理论及其与表扬的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(3): 255-259.
[15] 李永鑫, 李晓玉, 张娜, 申继亮. 组织竞争与教师组织认同的关系机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 37-41,66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!