冲突应对策略、信任与亲密关系满意度:主客体互倚分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.06.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究考察了大学生情侣冲突应对策略对彼此亲密关系满意度的影响以及信任的中介作用。使用方便取样法对异性恋大学生情侣进行问卷调查,共310对情侣自我报告了各自的冲突应对策略、信任和亲密关系满意度。基于主客体互倚模型分析,结果发现:(1)情侣各自的协作、谦让策略均显著正向预测自身的亲密关系满意度,信任在其中起部分中介作用;(2)情侣各自的支配、回避策略对自身亲密关系满意度的影响不显著,信任的中介作用不显著;(3)在情侣各自的协作、谦让策略对伴侣亲密关系满意度的影响中,信任起完全中介作用,其中男性群体中信任的中介作用存在遮掩效应,总效应不显著;(4)情侣各自的支配、回避策略对伴侣亲密关系满意度的影响不显著,信任的中介作用不显著。本研究基于主客体互倚模型,揭示了大学生情侣双方冲突应对策略影响亲密关系满意度的路径机制及其主客体互倚模式,对大学生情侣发展健康、良好的亲密关系具有重要现实意义。

关键词: 冲突应对策略, 信任, 亲密关系满意度, 主客体互倚模型

Abstract: This study examined the effects of conflict coping strategies on romantic relationship satisfaction and the mediating role of trust among college couples. A total of 310 heterosexual college couples reported their conflict coping strategies, trust, and romantic relationship satisfaction using a convenience sampling method. Based on an actor-partner interdependence model, the results revealed that: (1) Couples’ respective collaboration and modesty strategies significantly and positively predicted their own romantic relationship satisfaction, with trust playing a partially mediating role; (2) The effect of each couple’s dominance and avoidance strategies on their own intimacy satisfaction was not significant, and the mediating role of trust was not significant; (3) Trust played a fully mediating role in the effect of couples’ respective collaboration and modesty strategies on their partners’ romantic relationship satisfaction, with the suppressing effects of trust in the male group and a non-significant total effect; (4) The effect of couples’ respective dominance and avoidance strategies on partner romantic relationship satisfaction was not significant, and the mediating role of trust was not significant. Based on the actor-partner interdependence model, this study revealed the path mechanisms through which the conflict coping strategies of college student couples affect romantic relationship satisfaction and their actor-partner interdependence model, which has important practical implications for college student couples to develop a healthy and good romantic relationship.

Key words: conflict coping strategies, trust, romantic relationship satisfaction, actor-partner interdependence model

中图分类号:

B844

徐思元, 冯喜珍, 邸美琴, 连培琴, 徐前. 冲突应对策略、信任与亲密关系满意度:主客体互倚分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 777-790.

XU Siyuan, FENG Xizhen, DI Meiqin, LIAN Peiqin, XU Qian. Conflict Coping Strategies, Trust and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: Actor-partner Interdependence Modeling[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(6): 777-790.

参考文献

Arikewuyo, A. O., Eluwole, K. K., & Özad, B. (2021). Influence of lack of trust on romantic relationship problems: The mediating role of partner cell phone snooping.Psychological Reports, 124(1), 348-365.
Barden, E. P., Wang, B. A., Sternberg, J. A., Poole, L. Z., & Balderrama-Durbin, C. M. (2021). Dyadic trust as a mediator in the association between posttraumatic stress symptoms and relationship distress in community couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(3), 950-970.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good.Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
Berscheid, E. S., & Regan, P. C. (2005).The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Psychology Press.
Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485-493.
Brehm, S. S. (1992).Intimate relationships (2nd ed.). Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Bühler, J. L., Krauss, S., & Orth, U. (2021). Development of relationship satisfaction across the life span: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(10), 1012-1053.
Campbell, L., & Stanton, S. C. (2019). Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships.Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 148-151.
Candel, O. S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190-199.
Carcedo, R. J., Fernández-Rouco, N., Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., & Martínez-Álvarez, J. L. (2020). Association between sexual satisfaction and depression and anxiety in adolescents and young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030841
Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 14-26.
Clark, G. I., Rock, A. J., Clark, L. H., & Murray-Lyon, K. (2020). Adult attachment, worry and reassurance seeking: Investigating the role of intolerance of uncertainty. Clinical Psychologist, 24(3), 294-305.
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101-109.
Courtain, A., & Glowacz, F. (2019). Youth’s conflict resolution strategies in their dating relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 256-268.
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2019). How do couples disagree? An analysis of conflict resolution profiles and the quality of romantic relationships.Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28(2), 91-108.
Delatorre, M. Z., Wagner, A., & Bedin, L. M. (2022). Dyadic relationships between personality, social support, conflict resolution, and marital quality.Personal Relationships, 29(1), 199-216.
Donaghue, N., & Fallon, B. J. (2003). Gender-role self-stereotyping and the relationship between equity and satisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 48, 217-230.
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes.Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.
Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature.Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571
Feeney, J., & Fitzgerald, J. (2019). Attachment, conflict and relationship quality: Laboratory-based and clinical insights. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 127-131.
Feiring, C., Simon, V. A., & Markus, J. (2018). Narratives about specific romantic conflicts: Gender and associations with conflict beliefs and strategies.Journal of Counseling & Development, 96(3), 254-266.
Fitzpatrick, J., & Lafontaine, M. F. (2017). Attachment, trust, and satisfaction in relationships: Investigating actor, partner, and mediating effects.Personal Relationships, 24(3), 640-662.
Gesell, N., Niklas, F., Schmiedeler, S., & Segerer, R. (2020). Mindfulness and romantic relationship outcomes: The mediating role of conflict resolution styles and closeness.Mindfulness, 11(10), 2314-2324.
Gmelch, S., & Bodenmann, G. (2007). Dyadisches coping in selbst-und fremdwahrnehmung als prädiktor für partnerschaftsqualität und befinden. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 15(4), 177-186.
Gómez-López, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Well-being and romantic relationships: A systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132415
Harvey, J., Crowley, J., & Woszidlo, A. (2019). Mindfulness, conflict strategy use, and relational satisfaction: A dyadic investigation.Mindfulness, 10(4), 749-758.
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93-98.
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 187-220). London: Sage.
Igbo, H. I., Grace, A. R., & Christiana, E. O. (2015). Relationship between duration of marriage, personality trait, gender and conflict resolution strategies of spouses.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 490-496.
Jolin, S., Lafontaine, M. F., Lussier, Y., & Brassard, A. (2023). Howrelationship satisfaction and negative communication trajectories change in emerging adults’ dating relationships: A group-based dual trajectory analysis. Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 482-496.
Kansky, J., & Allen, J. P. (2018). Long-term risks and possible benefits associated with late adolescent romantic relationship quality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(7), 1531-1544.
Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 359-366.
Kleinert, T., Schiller, B., Fischbacher, U., Grigutsch, L., Koranyi, N., Rothermund, K., … Heinrichs, M. (2020). The Trust Game for Couples (TGC): A new standardized paradigm to assess trust in romantic relationships.PLoS ONE, 15(3), e230776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230776
Lantagne, A., Furman, W., & Novak, J. (2017). “Stay orleave” predictors of relationship dissolution in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 241-250.
Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595-604.
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595-612.
Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.),The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86-107). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Jackson, T. (2017). Towards explaining relationship dissatisfaction in Chinese dating couples: Relationship disillusionment, emergent distress, or insecure attachment style?Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 42-48.
Luetke, M., Hensel, D., Herbenick, D., & Rosenberg, M. (2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of American adults. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46(8), 747-762.
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect.Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181.
Mandal, E., & Lip, M. (2022). Mindfulness, relationship quality, and conflict resolution strategies used by partners in close relationships.Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10(2), 135-146.
Martos, T., Szabó, E., Koren, R., & Sallay, V. (2021). Dyadic coping in personal projects of romantic partners: Assessment and associations with relationship satisfaction.Current Psychology, 40, 2956-2969.
Mogilski, J. K., Vrabel, J., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. (2019). The primacy of trust within romantic relationships: Evidence from conjoint analysis of HEXACO-derived personality profiles. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(4), 365-374.
Papp, L. M., & Witt, N. L. (2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping:Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551-559.
Patrick, S., Beckenbach, J., Sells, J., & Reardon, R. F. (2013). An empirical investigation into justice, grace, and forgiveness: Paths to relationship satisfaction.The Family Journal, 21(2), 146-153.
Peel, R., & Caltabiano, N. (2021). Why do we sabotage love?A thematic analysis of lived experiences of relationship breakdown and maintenance. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 20(2), 99-131.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict.Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376.
Righetti, F., Duric, M., Hofmann, W., & Finkenauer, C. (2022). Self-regulation in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 29(4), 674-698.
Scheeren, P., Vieira, R. V. D. A., Goulart, V. R., & Wagner, A. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles.Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24(58), 177-186.
Sels, L., Cabrieto, J., Butler, E., Reis, H., Ceulemans, E., & Kuppens, P. (2020). The occurrence and correlates of emotional interdependence in romantic relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 136-158.
Sierau, S., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2012). Conflict resolution as a dyadic mediator: Considering the partner perspective on conflict resolution.European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 221-232.
Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.),Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 587-607). The Guilford Press.
Smedley, D. K., Leavitt, C. E., Allsop, D. B., Nance, M., James, S. L., & Holmes, E. K. (2021).Mindfulness and sexual mindfulness as moderators between conflict resolution and sexual and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(8), 814-828.
Spencer, C. M., Stith, S. M., & Cafferky, B. (2022). What puts individuals at risk for physical intimate partner violence perpetration? A meta-analysis examining risk markers for men and women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 36-51.
Taggart, T. C., Bannon, S. M., & Hammett, J. F. (2019). Personality traits moderate the association between conflict resolution and subsequent relationship satisfaction in dating couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 281-289.
Todorov, E. H., Paradis, A., & Ha, T. (2023). Emotion regulation difficulties and relationship satisfaction in adolescent couples: The role of conflict resolution strategies.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(8), 1753-1767.
Ünal, Ö., & Akgün, S. (2022). Conflict resolution styles as predictors of marital adjustment and marital satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 898-913.
Vollmann, M., Sprang, S., & van den Brink, F. (2019). Adult attachment and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of gratitude toward the partner.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11-12), 3875-3886.
Vowels, L. M., Carnelley, K. B., & Francois-Walcott, R. R. (2022). Successful negotiation of goal conflict between romantic partners predicts better goal outcomes during COVID-19: A mixed methods study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(2), 155-178.
Wallerstein, J. (2019).The good marriage: How and why love lasts. Plunkett Lake Press.
Wheeler, L. A., Updegraff, K. A., & Thayer, S. M. (2010). Conflict resolution in Mexican-origin couples: Culture, gender, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 991-1005.
Zeidner, M., & Kloda, I. (2013). Emotional intelligence (EI), conflict resolution patterns, and relationship satisfaction: Actor and partner effects revisited.Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 278-283.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
刘畅, 伍新春. (2017). 主客体互倚性的成对模式及其检验. 心理发展与教育, 33(1), 105-112.
刘泽文, 崔萌, 韩易静. (2014). 青年恋人的成人依恋、冲突解决行为与亲密关系满意度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(8), 597-601.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. (2023). 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应. 心理发展与教育, 39(1), 48-57.
杨阿丽, 方晓义. (2009). 婚姻冲突、应对策略及其与婚姻满意度的关系. 心理学探新, 29(1), 87-92.
尹洁. (2017). 大学生情侣冲突应对方式对亲密关系满意度的影响及团体干预研究(硕士学位论文).上海师范大学.
占琳. (2017). 大学生自我同一性与冲突管理方式对恋爱关系质量的影响(硕士学位论文). 赣南师范大学, 赣州.
张佳, 朱秀杰. (2022). 个体化视角下大学生的多元婚姻态度研究. 青年探索, (3), 91-100.
张勇, 刘红丽. (2010). 组织冲突问卷(ROCI-Ⅱ)在中国大学生中的因素结构研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(5), 584-586.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
朱新秤. (2021). 青年婚恋观的变迁与思考. 人民论坛, (35), 94-97.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[2]	焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[3]	张璟, 刘格格, 曹碧华. 背景线索对儿童选择性信任的影响:积极信息和非循环解释信息的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 313-321.
[4]	游志麒, 郭宇顺, 张陆, 李晓军. 父母冲突与青少年亲社会行为的关系: 人际信任与共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 51-59.
[5]	夏艳雨, 李丹, 马艳歌, 韩宪国, 李正云. 高中生父母婚姻冲突、焦虑与教养方式：主客体互倚调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 335-345.
[6]	项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[7]	田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[8]	刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[9]	王沛, 刘雨婷, 梁雅君, 谈晨皓. 关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 406-413.
[10]	李庆功, 张雯雨, 孙捷元, 马凤玲. 8~12岁儿童同伴信任的发展:特质可信度和面孔可信度的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 38-44.
[11]	赖晓璐, 江永强, 刘学兰, 黎莉, 张小樱, 张彩霞. 父母成人依恋、怜悯与亲子关系质量:主客体互倚分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 411-420.
[12]	童钰, 王福兴, 李卉. 信息提供者的先前准确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 257-266.
[13]	易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[14]	陈丽君, 王欣, 赵陵波, 陈昕, 王益文. 面孔二态性对学前儿童信任行为的影响——来自人格标签的解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 513-522.
[15]	刘国芳. 父母的经济人信念对自身信任及儿童信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 21-27.