领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.04.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 计算障碍的成因主要涉及领域一般能力缺陷和领域特殊能力缺陷。本研究采用元分析方法探讨领域一般能力缺陷和领域特殊能力缺陷对中国大陆计算障碍儿童的影响。对1991年—2021年间发表的关于中国大陆计算障碍儿童的文献进行检索和筛选,最后获得142篇文献,1220个独立效应量,6921名计算障碍儿童和6913名正常儿童进行元分析。结果显示,领域一般能力缺陷(g=-0.63)和领域特殊能力缺陷(g=-1.06)都是导致儿童产生计算障碍的重要原因,但领域特殊能力缺陷比领域一般能力缺陷更有可能导致计算障碍的发生。家长、教育者和社会相关人员需要针对计算障碍儿童的具体缺陷进行相应的干预与教育矫正。

关键词: 计算障碍儿童, 元分析, 领域一般能力, 领域特殊能力

Abstract: The causes of dyscalculia are mainly related to the deficits of domain general abilities and domain specific abilities. A meta-analysis method was used to explore the specific effects of domain general and domain specific ability deficits on dyscalculia children in mainland China in this study. The literature published between 1991~2021 on children with numeracy disorders in mainland was searched and screened, resulting in 142 articles, 1220 independent effect sizes, 6921 children with numeracy disorders and 6913 normal children for meta-analysis. The results showed that both domain general ability deficits and domain specific ability deficits were significant contributors to children with dyscalculia (g = -0.87). Domain-specific ability deficits (g = -1.06) were more likely than domain-general ability deficits (g = -0.63) to contribute to the development of dyscalculia in children. Parents, educators and social personnel need to take appropriate measures for specific defects to actively intervene and educate children with dyscalculia.

Key words: children with dyscalculia, meta-analysis, domain general abilities, domain specific abilities

中图分类号:

B844

王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.

WANG Yanjiao, HUANG Jiazhen, LONG Jia, WANG Pei. The Intrinsic Relationship between Domain General and Domain Specific Abilities and Dyscalculia and Its Implications: Based on A Meta-analysis Perspective[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.

参考文献

(^*为纳入元分析的文献)
Agostini, F., Zoccolotti, P., & Casagrande, M. (2022). Domain-General cognitire skill in children with mathematical difficulties and dyscalculia:A systematic review of the literature. Brain Sciences, 12(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020239
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Publishing.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97-111.
Butterworth, B. (2010). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(12), 534-541.
Cai, D., Zhao, J., Chen, Z. J., & Liu, D. (2022). Executive Functions Training for 7-to 10-Year-Old Students with Mathematics Difficulty:Instant Effects and 6-Month Sustained Effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(5), 392-409.
Chan, B. M. Y., & Ho, C. S. H. (2010). The cognitive profile of Chinese children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(3), 260-279.
Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease.Health Psychology, 7(3), 269-297.
Coolen, I., Merkley, R., Ansari, D., Dove, E., Dowker, A., Mills, A., … Scerif, G. (2021). Domain-general and domain-specific influences on emerging numerical cognition:Contrasting uni-and bidirectional prediction models.Cognition, 215, 104816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104816
Costa, H. M., Nicholson, B., Donlan, C., & Van Herwegen, J. (2018). Low performance on mathematical tasks in preschoolers:The importance of domain-general and domain-specific abilities.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62(4), 292-302.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634.
Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Seethaler, P. M., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1731-1746.
Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics:Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Cambell (Ed.),Handbook of mathematical congnition (pp. 253-267). New York:PsychologyPress.
Geary, D. C. (2013). Early Foundations for Mathematics Learning and Their Relations to Learning Disabilities.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 23-27.
Geary, D. C., Nicholas, A., Li, Y. R., & Sun, J. G. (2017). Developmental Change in the Influence of Domain-General Abilities and Domain-Specific Knowledge on Mathematics Achievement:An Eight-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 680-693.
Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 490-499.
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S., Deeks, J., & Altman, D. (2002). Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials:A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(1), 51-61.
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560.
Mammarella, I. C., Hill, F., Devine, A., Caviola, S., & Szucs, D. (2015). Math anxiety and developmental dyscalculia:A study on working memory processes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(8), 878-887.
Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364-386.
Nelson, G., & Powell, S. R. (2018). A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies of Mathematics Difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 523-539.
Peng, P., Wang, C. C., & Namkung, J. (2018). Understanding the Cognition Related to Mathematics Difficulties:A Meta-Analysis on the Cognitive Deficit Profiles and the Bottleneck Theory.Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 434-476.
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis:Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
Schwenk, C., Sasanguie, D., Kuhn, J. T., Kempe, S., Doebler, P., & Holling, H. (2017). (Non-)symbolic magnitude processing in children with mathematical difficulties:A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 64, 152-167.
Thomson, J. B., Chenault, B., Abbott, R. D., Raskind, W. H., Richards, T., Aylward, E., & Berninger, V. W. (2005). Convergingevidence for attentional influences on the orthographic word form in child dyslexics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18(2), 93-126.
Traff, U., Olsson, L., Skagerlund, K., & Ostergren, R. (2020). Kindergarten Domain-Specific and Domain-General Cognitive Precursors of Hierarchical Mathematical Development:A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 93-109.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018).International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th Revision). Geneva:World Health Organization.
Zhang, X., Rasanen, P., Koponen, T., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2017). Knowing, Applying, and Reasoning About Arithmetic:Roles of Domain-General and Numerical Skills in Multiple Domains of Arithmetic Learning. Developmental Psychology, 53(12), 2304-2318.
白学军, 臧传丽. (2006). 发展性计算障碍研究及数学教育对策. 辽宁师范大学学报, (1), 45-49.
^*蔡丹, 李其维, 邓赐平. (2011). 数学学习困难初中生的中央执行系统特点. 心理科学, 34(2), 361-366.
^*蔡丹, 李其维, 邓赐平. (2013). 数学学业不良初中生的工作记忆特点:领域普遍性还是特殊性? 心理学报, 45(2), 193-205.
陈英和, 王明怡. (2006). 工作记忆广度对儿童算术认知策略的影响. 心理发展与教育, 22(2), 29-35.
董奇, 张树东, 张红川. (2004). 发展性计算障碍-脑与认知研究的新成果及其对教育的启示. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 26-32.
^*焦彩珍. (2014). 初中数学学习困难学生认知灵活性的实验研究. 数学教育学报, 23(3), 64-67.
^*焦彩珍, 刘治宏. (2018). 初中数学学习困难学生的抑制控制能力缺陷. 数学教育学报, 27(1), 47-51.
教育部. (2021). 2021年全国教育事业发展统计公报.取自https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202209/t20220914_660850.html
教育部,国家发展改革委,民政部,财政部,人力资源社会保障部,国家卫生健康委,中国残联.(2022). "十四五"特殊教育发展提升行动计划. 2022-1-25.取自https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-01/25/content-5670341.htm
康丹, 李飞燕, 文鑫, 胡姿. (2018). 5~6岁潜在数学学习困难儿童数学和工作记忆的4 周游戏训练效果. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(6), 495-501.
康丹, 曾莉. (2018). 早期儿童数学学习与执行功能的关系. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1661-1669.
康丹, 李飞燕, 文鑫, 胡姿, 杨智华,李晶. (2018). 5~6岁潜在数学学习困难儿童数学和工作记忆的4周游戏训练效果. 中国心理卫生杂志, 32(6), 495-501.
^*赖颖慧, 朱小爽, 黄大庆, 陈英和. (2014). 3-6年级数学学习困难儿童与正常儿童空间能力的比较. 心理与行为研究, 12(1), 36-44.
^*李小溪, 杨佳欣, 路浩, 王芳, 赵晖. (2015). 发展性计算障碍的基本数量加工缺陷及一般认知特征. 中国特殊教育, 182(8), 56-63.
^*刘昌. (2004). 数学学习困难儿童的认知加工机制研究.南京师大学报(社会科学版), 5(3), 81-88.
^*柳笛, 蔡丹. (2017). 数困生数字线估计能力的发展及其与PASS各认知过程的关系.中国特殊教育, 210(12), 32-38.
路浩, 周新林. (2012). 数学认知与学习的脑科学研究进展及其教育启示. 教育学报, 8(4), 62-69.
魏勇刚, 庞丽娟, 夏婧. (2008). 执行功能与儿童数学认知. 心理科学, 173(3), 652-653+651.
^*张李斌, 张丽, 冯廷勇. (2019). 发展性计算障碍儿童的数感缺陷. 心理与行为研究, 7(20), 512-519.
^*张丽, 蒋慧, 赵立. (2018). 发展性计算障碍儿童的数量转换缺陷. 心理科学, 41(2), 1671-6981.
^*张丽锦, 张臻峰. (2014). 动态测验对"数学学习困难"儿童的进一步甄别. 心理学报, 46(8), 1112-1123.
赵晖, 路浩, 张树东. (2013). 发展性计算障碍的最新研究进展. 心理发展与教育, 29(4), 441-448.
^*周世杰, 杨娟, 张拉艳. (2006).工作记忆、执行功能、加工速度与数学障碍儿童推理和心算能力的关系.中国临床心理学杂志, 14(6), 574-577.
周新林. (主编). (2016). 教育神经科学与国民素质提升系列丛书:教育神经科学视野中的数学教育创新. 北京:教育科学出版社.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	李莉, 李倩倩, 阮世芳, 张云运. 师幼互动质量与儿童发展的领域内和跨领域关联——基于国内外45项实证研究的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 332-347.
[2]	谢和平, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周宗奎, 邓素娥, 段朝辉. 记忆的生成绘图效应及其边界条件：一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 29-43.
[3]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[4]	程阳春, 黄瑾. 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[5]	高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[6]	谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[7]	牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 407-418.
[8]	颜志强, 苏彦捷. 认知共情和情绪共情的发展差异:元分析初探[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 1-9.
[9]	辛素飞, 岳阳明, 辛自强. 1996至2016年中国老年人心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 753-761.
[10]	雷丽丽, 冉光明, 张琪, 米倩文, 陈旭. 父母教养方式与幼儿焦虑关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 329-340.
[11]	李松, 冉光明, 张琪, 胡天强. 中国背景下自我效能感与心理健康的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 759-768.
[12]	周丽, 王福兴, 谢和平, 陈佳雪, 辛亮, 赵庆柏. 积极的情绪能否促进多媒体学习?基于元分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 697-709.
[13]	辛素飞, 王一鑫. 中国大学生成就动机变迁的横断历史研究:1999~2014[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 288-294.
[14]	辛素飞, 岳阳明, 辛自强, 林崇德. 1996至2015年中国老年人社会支持的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 672-681.
[15]	颜志强, 苏彦捷. 共情的性别差异:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 129-136.