心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 824-831.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.06.07

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    

流言让人分心:校园负面八卦对中学生上课走神的影响

丁倩1,2, 宋紫薇1, 李明蔚1, 李晓彤1, 周宗奎2   

  1. 1. 信阳师范大学教育科学学院, 信阳 464000;
    2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2024-11-13
  • 通讯作者: 周宗奎,E-mail:zhouzk@ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:zhouzk@ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(20CSH098)。

Gossip Is Distracting You: The Impact of Negative School Gossip on Middle School Students’ Mind Wandering in Class

DING Qian1,2, SONG Ziwei1, LI Mingwei1, LI Xiaotong1, ZHOU Zongkui2   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000;
    2. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2024-11-13

摘要: 为探讨校园负面八卦对中学生上课走神的影响及其作用机制,本研究基于执行控制失败理论和性别角色理论建构了一个有调节的中介模型。采取整群抽样法,以778名中学生为被试,采用校园负面八卦量表、超简抑郁焦虑筛查量表和青少年心智游移问卷进行调查,结果显示:(1)在控制年龄的条件下,校园负面八卦显著正向预测中学生上课走神;(2)消极情绪在校园负面八卦与中学生上课走神之间起完全中介作用;(3)性别调节校园负面八卦通过消极情绪影响中学生上课走神的前半段路径。具体来说,相比于男生,校园负面八卦对女生消极情绪的预测作用更大。研究结果从人际压力和不良情绪的角度揭示了中学生上课走神的形成机制,对其干预具有一定参考价值。

关键词: 校园负面八卦, 消极情绪, 走神, 性别差异

Abstract: In order to examine the effect of negative school gossip on middle school students’ mind wandering in class and its mechanism, based on the executive failure hypothesis and sex-role theory, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model. By cluster sampling method, a sample of 778 junior and senior high school students was recruited to complete the negative school gossip scale, patient health questionnaire 4, and mind wandering questionnaire for youth. Results showed that: (1) After controlling for age, negative school gossip significantly positively predicted middle school students’ mind wandering in class; (2) Negative emotion played a full mediating effect in the relationship between negative school gossip and mind wandering in class; (3) Gender moderated the first path of this mediating effect, such that the indirect effect was much stronger for girls than for boys. These findings revealed the formation mechanism of adolescents’ mind wandering in class from the perspective of interpersonal stress and unhealthy emotion, which had a certain reference value for the intervention.

Key words: negative school gossip, negative emotion, mind wandering, gender differences

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640-2670.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.
Chung, G. H., Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2009). Daily family conflict and emotional distress among adolescents from Latin American, Asian, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1406-1415.
Derakshan, N., Smyth, S., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Effects of state anxiety on performance using a task-switching paradigm: An investigation of attentional control theory.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(6), 1112-1117.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences.In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies (pp. 1-3), Wiley Online Library.
Ellwardt, L., Steglich, C., & Wittek, R. (2012). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 623-633.
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions.Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78-99.
Hayes, A. F. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hill, R. M., & Pettit, J. W. (2013). The role of autonomy needs in suicidal ideation: Integrating the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide and self-determination theory. Archives of Suicide Research, 17(3), 288-301.
Joiner, T., & Van Orden, K. (2008). The interpersonal psychological theory of suicidal behavior indicates specific and crucialpsychotherapeutic targets. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(1), 80-89.
Jubera-Garcia, E., Gevers, W., & Opstal, F. V. (2021). Local build-up of sleep pressure could trigger mind wandering: Evidence from sleep, circadian and mind wandering research. Biochemical Pharmacology, 191, 114478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114478
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932-932.
Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(1), 40-49.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613-621.
Luo, Y. L., Zhang, Y. L., Sun X. D., Dong J. L., Wu J. S., & Lin X. F. (2022). Mediating effect of self-control in the relationship between psychological distress and food addiction among college students.Appetite, 179, 106278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106278
Lyubomirsky, S., Layous, K., Chancellor, J., & Nelson, S. K. (2015). Thinking about rumination: The scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan Nolen-Hoeksema.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 1-22.
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function.Science, 341(6149), 976-980.
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188-197.
Mrazek M. D., Franklin, M. S., Phillips, D. T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776-781.
Mrazek, M. D., Phillips, D. T., Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Young and restless: Validation of the mind-wandering questionnaire (MWQ) reveals disruptive impact of mind-wandering for youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00560
Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Carr, P. C., Delegard, A. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). The feasibility of attention training for reducing mind-wandering and digital multitasking in high schools. Education Sciences, 10(8), 201-209.
Nixon, C. L., Jairam, D., Davis, S., Linkie, C. A., & Hodge, J. J. (2020). Effects of students' grade level, gender, and form of bullying victimization on coping strategy effectiveness.International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(2), 190-204.
Noakes, M. A., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2006). Age and gender differences in peer conflict.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 881-891.
Pereira, E. J., Gurguryan, L., & Ristic, J. (2020). Trait-level variability in attention modulates mind wandering and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00909
Peterson, D. J., & Wissman, K. (2020). Using tests to reduce mind-wandering during learning review. Memory, 28(4), 582-587.
Roczniewska, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Burnout and self-regulation failure: A diary study of self-undermining and job crafting among nurses.Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(8), 3424-3435.
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487-518.
Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., & Phillips, L. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wanderingminds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion, 9(2), 271-276.
Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 10(16), 6313-6317.
Unsworth, N., Mcmillan, B. D., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2012). Everyday attention failures: An individual differences investigation.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 38(6), 1765-1772.
Unsworth, N., & Mcmillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 832-842.
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle.Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280.
Verbruggen, F., & Houwer, J. D. (2007). Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm.Cognition and Emotion, 21(2), 391-403.
Vinski, M. T., & Scott, W. (2013). Being a grump only makes things worse: A transactional account of acute stress on mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(4), 730-742.
Wammes, J. D., Boucher, P. O., Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2016). Mind wandering during lectures I: Changes in rates across an entire semester.Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(1), 13-32.
Wang, Q., Hu, W., Ouyang, X., Chen, H., & Jiang, Y. (2020). The relationship between negative school gossip and suicide intention in Chinese junior high school students: The mediating effect of academic burnout. Children and Youth Services Review, 117(4), 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105272
Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Ma, J. (2018). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 801-815.
陈静, 冉光明, 张琪下, 牛湘. (2022).儿童和青少年同伴侵害与攻击行为关系的三水平元分析. 心理科学进展, 30(2), 275-290.
杜恒波, 朱千林. (2018). 职场负面八卦对科技人员创造力的影响机制研究. 心理科学, 41(1), 125-131.
杜恒波, 朱千林, 刘春红. (2019). 职场负面八卦对主动性行为的影响机制研究: 一个有调节的中介模型. 管理评论, 31(2), 190-199.
杜佳璇, 徐慰. (2019). 日常生活中压力对负性情绪的影响: 心智游移的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(4), 772-776.
龚朝花, 李倩, 刘小会, 龚勇. (2018). 微视频自主学习中的心智游移、学习行为与学习绩效研究. 中国电化教育, (5), 110-117.
何雅文, 江琴. (2021). 网络欺凌与青少年非自杀性自伤行为关系的研究进展. 精神医学杂志, 34(4), 371-375.
鞠恩霞, 张晏宁, 罗扬眉. (2016). 心理游离问卷中文版的修订及其信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(1), 109-111.
李乃文, 刘孟潇, 牛莉霞. (2019). 辱虐管理对安全绩效的影响——心理痛苦和心智游移的链式中介作用. 软科学, 33(9), 60-63.
李乃文, 王磊. (2019). 压力源—倦怠—心智游移的SBM模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用. 科技促进发展, 15(12), 1344-1349.
牛莉霞, 刘洁, 李乃文. (2020). 人因失误驱动力SBM跨层次模型. 中国安全科学学报, 30(12), 43-51.
钱洁, 姜敏敏, 陈晨, 陈玉娇, 于德华, 李春波. (2021). 超简抑郁焦虑筛查量表在社区门诊的信度和效度研究. 内科理论与实践, 16(2), 116-120.
任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. (2021). 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响: 悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 37(6), 873-881.
宋晓兰, 王晓, 唐孝威. (2011). 心智游移: 现象、机制及意义. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 499-509.
孙博. (2020). 中学生网络成瘾与课堂走神的关系 (硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
王吉华. (2018). 短期正念呼吸冥想训练对走神的影响 (硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
王琼, 陈慧玲, 胡伟, 许存. (2022). 校园人际谣言对初中生抑郁的影响: 有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 30(3), 595-599.
王雪枫, 严燕. (2020). 走神研究的理论、方法与展望. 心理发展与教育, 36(3), 367-377.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
吴才智, 荣硕, 朱芳婷, 谌燕, 郭永玉. (2018). 基本心理需要及其满足. 心理科学进展, 26(6), 117-127.
吴鹏, 刘华山, 刁春婷. (2012). 青少年攻击行为与友谊质量的交叉滞后回归分析. 心理学探新, 32(1), 49-54.
邢晓沛, 李苗苗, 阴桐桐. (2018). 母亲负性情绪与儿童外化问题行为的关系: 家庭嘈杂度的调节作用. 心理科学, 41(4), 842-848.
杨书胜, 耿淑娟, 刘冰. (2017). 我国校园欺凌现象2006—2016年发展状况. 中国学校卫生, 38(3), 458-460.
杨亚琦. (2020). 中学生学习倦怠与课堂走神的关系 (硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
姚海娟, 王琦, 李兆卿. (2022). 情绪调节中的认知重评创造力. 心理科学进展, 30(3), 601-612.
岳文忠, 吴隆增, 杨自伟, 翟海燕. (2015). 职场负面八卦的前因与后果: 基于八卦目标的视角. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 702-710.
张桂林. (2021). 中生学业压力与课堂走神的关系:意志控制的中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 张玲玲, 陈光辉, 王姝琼. (2009). 童年中期身体侵害、关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应. 心理学报, 41(5), 433-443.
[1] 刘晓婷, 张宁. 青少年早期睡眠问题的发展:性别差异及正性负性情绪的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 551-562.
[2] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[3] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[4] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[5] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[6] 李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[7] 杨晨, 连帅磊, 陈春宇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 同伴依恋与初中生手机成瘾的关系:有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 538-545.
[8] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[9] 白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[10] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[11] 施国春, 赵东妍, 范会勇. 2004至2016年中国大学生身体自尊的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 648-659.
[12] 窦芬, 李巧灵, 王书豪. 自我分化与大学生经验回避:羞怯的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 517-524.
[13] 林悦, 刘勤学, 余思, 周宗奎. 父母忽视与青少年网络游戏成瘾的关系:希望的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 109-119.
[14] 王苏, 盖笑松. 3~4岁幼儿冷热自我调节的发展趋势及性别差异——一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 641-648.
[15] 赵旭, 彭茂滢, 杨娟. 内隐品质/外貌自我概念对内隐自尊的预测—性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 296-303.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!