受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用追踪研究设计,探讨受欺负与初中生主动性和反应性攻击之间的关系,道德推脱的中介作用以及性别的调节作用。研究对2533名八年级学生(初测年龄为13.95±0.60,51.32%男生)开展了间隔半年的两次测查。结果表明:(1)T1受欺负显著正向预测T2主动性攻击和反应性攻击;(2)T2道德推脱在T1受欺负和T2主动性、反应性攻击之间均起到部分中介作用;(3)主动性攻击的中介模型还受性别的调节,在女生中T1受欺负对T2道德推脱的预测作用更强,在男生中T2道德推脱对T2主动性攻击的预测作用更强。本研究的结果提示,相关教育工作者需要关注受欺负青少年的道德推脱水平,对这些青少年的道德认知进行有效干预,从而阻断受欺负和攻击行为之间的关联。

关键词: 受欺负, 主动性攻击, 反应性攻击, 道德推脱, 性别

Abstract: To investigate the relationship between bully victimization and proactive/reactive aggression, the mediating effect of moral disengagement and the moderating effect of gender, a sample of 2533 middle students (initial age 13.95 ± 0.60, 51.32% boys) was followed up for six months and examined for two waves. The results showed that: (1) Bully victimization at wave 1 could significantly and positively predict proactive aggression and reactive aggression at wave 2; (2) Moral disengagement mediated the relationship between victimization and proactive/reactive aggression; (3) The mediating effect of moral disengagement in the link between victimization and proactive aggression was moderated by gender. For girls, the relationship between victimization and moral disengagement was stronger. For boys, the relationship between moral disengagement and proactive aggression was stronger. The results of the present study suggest that relevant educators should pay attention to the level of moral disengagement of adolescents. Intervening adolescents’ moral cognition will help cut off the link between bully victimization and aggressive behavior.

Key words: bully victimization, proactive aggression, reactive aggression, moral disengagement, gender

中图分类号:

B844

汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.

WANG Yue, XIONG Yuke, REN Ping, YANG Liu, MIAO Wei. Effects of Bully-victimization on Proactive and Reactive Aggression in Early Adolescence: The Role of Moral Disengagement and Gender[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.

参考文献

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression:A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
Barker, E. D., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D. S., Vitaro, F., & Lacourse, E. (2006). Development of male proactive and reactive physical aggression during adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 47(8), 783-790.
Barker, E. D., Vitaro, F., Lacourse, E., Fontaine, N. M., Carbonneau, R., & Tremblay, R. E.(2010). Testing the developmental distinctiveness of male proactive and reactive aggression with a nested longitudinal experimental intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 127-140.
Barzi, F., & Woodward, M. (2004). Imputations of missing values in practice:Results from imputations of serum cholesterol in 28 cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(1), 34-45.
Berkowitz, L. (1962).Aggression:A social psychological analysis. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
Bettencourt, B., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 422-447.
Carbone-Lopez, K., Esbensen, F. A., & Brick, B. T. (2010). Correlates and consequences of peer victimization:Gender differences in direct and indirect forms of bullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(4), 332-350.
Carlyle, K. E., & Steinman, K. J. (2007). Demographic differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. Journal of School Health, 77(9), 623-629.
Castillo-Eito, L., Armitage, C. J., Norman, P., Day,M. R., Dogru, O. C., & Rowe, R. (2020). How can adolescent aggression be reduced? A multi-level meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 78, 101853.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101853
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence:A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65-83.
Cooley, J. L., Fite, P. J., & Pederson, C. A. (2018). Bidirectional associations between peer victimization and functions of aggression in middle childhood:Further evaluation across informants and academic years.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 99-111.
Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123-130.
DeWall, C. N., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). The general aggression model:Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 245-258.
Dinic',B. M., & Wertag, A. (2018). Effects of Dark Triad and HEXACO traits on reactive/proactive aggression:Exploring the gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 44-49.
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158.
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT:Yale Univrsity Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior. A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309-330.
Falla, D., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Runions, K., & Romera, E. M. (2020). Why do victims become perpetrators of peer bullying? Moral disengagement in the cycle of violence. Youth & Society, 0044118X20973702.https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X20973702
Fite, P. J., Rathert, J., Colder, C. R., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2011). Proactive and Reactive Aggression. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed), Encyclopedia of Adolescence(pp. 2164-2170). Springer.
Fite, P. J., Raine, A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. A. (2009). Reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent males:Examining differential outcomes 10 years later in early adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 141-157.
Fung, A. L. C., Tsang, E. Y. H., Zhou, G., Low, A. Y. T., Ho, M. Y., & Lam, B. Y. H. (2019). Relationship between peer victimization and reactive-proactive aggression in school children. Psychology of Violence, 9(3), 350-358.
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2015). The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding:A multilevel analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(3), 441-452.
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school:An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 587-599.
Gruber, J. E., & Fineran, S. (2008). Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents.Sex Roles, 59(1), 1-13.
Hayes, A. F. (2017).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York, NY:Guilford publications.
Hyde, L. W., Burt, S. A., Shaw, D. S., Donnellan, M. B., & Forbes, E. E. (2015). Early starting, aggressive, and/or callous-unemotional? Examining the overlap and predictive utility of antisocial behavior subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 329-342.
Jang, H., Song, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 85-93.
Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D. J., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth.Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 450-462.
Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Pérusse, D. (2007). Do friends' characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 665-680.
Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., & Galotti, K. M. (2006). Children's moral reasoning regarding physical and relational aggression. Social Development, 15(3), 345-372.
Obermann, M.-L. (2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 133-144.
Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2005). Aggressive girls on troubled trajectories:A developmental perspective. In D. J. Pepler, K. C. Madsen, C. D. Webster, & K. S. Levene(Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression(pp. 3-28). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Perren, S., Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E., Malti, T., & Hymel, S. (2012). Moral reasoning and emotion attributions of adolescent bullies, victims, and bully-victims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 511-530.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J.(2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students:The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94.
Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., … Liu, J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire:Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159-171.
Rubio-Garay, F., Amor, P. J., & Carrasco, M. A. (2019). The contribution of moral disengagement to dating violence and general aggression:The gender and age moderating effects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22, E59.https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.57
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Hubbard, J. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lemerise, E. A., & Bateman, H. (1998). Social-cognitive and behavioral correlates of aggression and victimization in boys' play groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26(6), 431-440.
Smith, P. K., Catalano, R., Junger-tas, J. J., Slee, P. P., Morita, Y., & Olweus, D. (Eds.). (1999).The nature of school bullying:A cross-national perspective. Psychology Press.
Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations:Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475-483.
Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244-249.
Xu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2008). Distinguishing proactive and reactive aggression in chinese children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 539-552.
刘晓薇, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 张文新, Salmivalli,C. (2021). 班级环境如何影响受欺负者的适应?健康环境悖论及其发生机制. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 298-304.
唐文清, 方杰, 蒋香梅, 张敏强. (2014). 追踪研究方法在国内心理研究中的应用述评. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 216-224.
王建发, 刘娟, 王芳. (2018). 线下受害者到线上欺负者的转化:道德推脱的中介作用及高自尊对此效应的加强. 心理学探新, 38(5), 469-474.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2010). 中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 177-179.
王兴超, 杨继平, 杨力. (2014). 道德推脱与攻击行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1092-1102.
吴鹏, 刘华山, 陈京军, 谢继红. (2014). 攻击性初中生的类别转变:潜在转变分析. 心理科学, 37(5), 1167-1173.
杨慧芳. (2003). 广义紧张理论研究的新进展. 心理科学, 26(1), 170-171.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
张万里, 贾世伟, 陈光辉, 张文新. (2014). 反应性-主动性攻击问卷在大学生中的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(2), 260-263.
张文新. (2002). 中小学生欺负/受欺负的普遍性与基本特点. 心理学报, 34(4), 387-394.
张文新, 武建芬, Jones,K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11+37.
周广东, 冯丽姝. (2014). 区分两类攻击行为:反应性与主动性攻击. 心理发展与教育, 30(1), 105-111.
朱晓伟, 周宗奎, 褚晓伟, 雷玉菊, 范翠英. (2019). 从受欺负到网上欺负他人:有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(3), 492-496.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[4]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[5]	鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
[6]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[7]	张林, 陈燕铃, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 范航, 刘燊. 冷酷无情特质与初中生校园欺凌行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 266-275.
[8]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[9]	诸钟烨, 谢于宏, 刘雷. 正负参照点下性别和损益情景对大学生延迟折扣的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 618-625.
[10]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[11]	白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[12]	刘春晖, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 母亲男孩偏好和亲子沟通的关系:子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[13]	李启明. 双元孝道代际传递:亲子性别和子女年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 808-817.
[14]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[15]	施国春, 赵东妍, 范会勇. 2004至2016年中国大学生身体自尊的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 648-659.