友伴人际品格对儿童人际品格的影响:友伴数量的调节作用及儿童群体差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 友伴是儿童发展的重要影响源。本研究从儿童积极发展的视角探讨友伴人际品格（仁慈和公正）对儿童人际品格的影响及友伴数量在其中的调节作用，并检验了儿童的群体（学段、性别、是否独生）差异状况。研究采用班级同伴提名法及儿童品格调查问卷对1555名4~9年级儿童及其互提名友伴展开调查。结果发现：（1）友伴仁慈和公正显著预测所有儿童群体的仁慈和公正；（2）儿童的友伴数量更多时，友伴公正对其公正的预测作用更显著；该调节效应仅体现在初中生和男生群体上。研究结果表明，儿童与具有积极品格特征的友伴交往对其积极品格的发展至关重要，且对于特定群体（如初中生、男生），与越多具有积极品质的友伴交往，其受到的积极影响越大。

关键词: 友伴, 儿童, 人际品格, 友伴数量, 群体差异

Abstract: Playmates is an important source of influence on children's development. This study aimed to explore the positive associations between playmates' and children's interpersonal character (including humanity and justice) from the perspective of children's positive development. In addition, the moderating role of the number of playmates in the associations and child group differences (i.e., grade, gender, sibling status) were examined. Participates were 1555 fourth-to ninth-graders and their reciprocal playmates. The peer nomination method and a character questionnaire were employed to conduct the investigation. The results showed that:(1) The playmates' and children's humanity as well as justice was significantly associated, regardless of the child grade, gender, and sibling status; (2) The association between playmates' and children's justice was enhanced with the number of playmates increasing, however, this moderating effect displayed only on the secondary school children and boys. These findings suggested that children's associating with playmates who have positive character is significant to their development of positive character. In particular, children of some specific groups (e.g., secondary school children and boys) interacting with more playmates with good character may receive the greater positive influence from playmates.

Key words: playmates, children, interpersonal character, number of playmates, child group difference

中图分类号:

B844

刘丽莎, 吴玉婷, 李超群, 徐良苑, 李燕芳. 友伴人际品格对儿童人际品格的影响:友伴数量的调节作用及儿童群体差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 628-637.

LIU Lisha, WU Yuting, LI Chaoqun, XU Liangyuan, LI Yanfang. Influence of Playmates' Interpersonal Character on Children's Interpersonal Character: The Moderating Role of the Number of Playmates and Child Group Differences[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 628-637.

参考文献

Bandura, A. (Ed.).(1986).Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.7 Prentice-Hall.
Benenson, J. F., Apostoleris, N. H., & Parnass, J. (1997). Age and sex differences in dyadic and group interaction. Developmental Psychology, 33, 538-543.
Berthelon, M., Bettinger, E., Kruger, D. I., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. (2019). The structure of peers:The impact of peer networks on academic achievement. Research in Higher Education, 60, 931-959.
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily:A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179.
Brown, B. B., & Klute, C., (2006). Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 330-348). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
Burk, W. J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics:Selection and socialization in early, middle and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory:Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.Statistics in Medicine, 32(4), 556-577.
Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Shared virtue:The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203-213.
Falbo, T. (2012). Only Children:An Updated Review.Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(1), 38-49.
Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence:A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313-335.
Giletta, M., Scholte, R. H., Prinstein, M. J., Engels, R. C., Rabaglietti, E., & Burk, W. J. (2012). Friendship context matters:Examining the domain specificity of alcohol and depression socialization among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(7), 1027-1043.
Gorrese, A., & Ruggieri, R. (2012). Peer attachment:A meta-analytic review of gender and age differences and associations with parent attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 650-672.
Hartup, W.W., & Abecassis, M. (2002). Friends and enemies. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 286-306). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
Law, B. M.,Shek, D. T., & Ma, C. M. (2013). Validation of family, school, and peer influence on volunteerism scale among adolescents. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(4), 458-466.
Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process:A developmental perspective.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 54-58.
Ngai, S. S. Y. (2015). Parental bonding and character strengths among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 317-333.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006a).Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents:The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891-909.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006b). Character strengths and happiness among young children:Content analysis of parental descriptions.Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 323-341.
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being.Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues:A handbook and classification. Oxford University press.
Poldin, O., Valeeva, D., & Yudkevich, M. (2016). Which peers matter:How social ties affect peer-group effects. Research in Higher Education, 57(4), 448-468.
Prinstein, M. J. (2007). Moderators of peer contagion:A longitudinal examination of depression socialization between adolescents and their best friends. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2), 159-170.
Scales, P., Benson, P.,Leffert, N., & Blyth, D.A. (2000). The contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27-46.
Shoshani, A., & Slone, M. (2013). Middle school transition from the strengths perspective:Young adolescents' character strengths, subjective well-being, and school adjustment. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1163-1181.
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence.Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531-1543.
VanGoethem, A. A., Van Hoof, A., van Aken, M. A., de Castro, B. O., & Raaijmakers, Q. A. (2014). Socialising adolescent volunteering:How important are parents and friends? Age dependent effects of parents and friends on adolescents' volunteering behaviours. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 94-101.
Véronneau, M. H., & Vitaro, F. (2007). Social experiences with peers and high school graduation:A review of theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 419-445.
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school:Influences on motivation and school adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-203.
Zhang, H. Y., Li, X. Y., & Wang, Y. C. (2016). Influence of character strengths on adolescent depressive symptoms and regulatory effect of gender and age.Chinese General Practice, 1(19), 115-118.
方晓义. (1997). 友伴对青少年吸烟和饮酒行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 13(4), 51-56.
风笑天. (2000). 独生子女青少年的社会化过程及其结果. 中国社会科学, 6, 118-131.
郝玉章, 风笑天. (1997). 中学独生子女社会化的现状——对湖北省五市镇593名中学生的调查分析. 青年研究, 8, 7-15.
游志麒, 张凤娟, 范翠英, 平凡, 周宗奎. (2016). 班级朋友对抑郁的影响:一项社会网络分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 339-348.
张凤娟. (2014). 朋友网络背景中的同伴乐观发展:童年中晚期追踪研究(博士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed