友伴人际品格对儿童人际品格的影响:友伴数量的调节作用及儿童群体差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 友伴是儿童发展的重要影响源。本研究从儿童积极发展的视角探讨友伴人际品格（仁慈和公正）对儿童人际品格的影响及友伴数量在其中的调节作用，并检验了儿童的群体（学段、性别、是否独生）差异状况。研究采用班级同伴提名法及儿童品格调查问卷对1555名4~9年级儿童及其互提名友伴展开调查。结果发现：（1）友伴仁慈和公正显著预测所有儿童群体的仁慈和公正；（2）儿童的友伴数量更多时，友伴公正对其公正的预测作用更显著；该调节效应仅体现在初中生和男生群体上。研究结果表明，儿童与具有积极品格特征的友伴交往对其积极品格的发展至关重要，且对于特定群体（如初中生、男生），与越多具有积极品质的友伴交往，其受到的积极影响越大。

关键词: 友伴, 儿童, 人际品格, 友伴数量, 群体差异

Abstract: Playmates is an important source of influence on children's development. This study aimed to explore the positive associations between playmates' and children's interpersonal character (including humanity and justice) from the perspective of children's positive development. In addition, the moderating role of the number of playmates in the associations and child group differences (i.e., grade, gender, sibling status) were examined. Participates were 1555 fourth-to ninth-graders and their reciprocal playmates. The peer nomination method and a character questionnaire were employed to conduct the investigation. The results showed that:(1) The playmates' and children's humanity as well as justice was significantly associated, regardless of the child grade, gender, and sibling status; (2) The association between playmates' and children's justice was enhanced with the number of playmates increasing, however, this moderating effect displayed only on the secondary school children and boys. These findings suggested that children's associating with playmates who have positive character is significant to their development of positive character. In particular, children of some specific groups (e.g., secondary school children and boys) interacting with more playmates with good character may receive the greater positive influence from playmates.

Key words: playmates, children, interpersonal character, number of playmates, child group difference

中图分类号:

B844

刘丽莎, 吴玉婷, 李超群, 徐良苑, 李燕芳. 友伴人际品格对儿童人际品格的影响:友伴数量的调节作用及儿童群体差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 628-637.

LIU Lisha, WU Yuting, LI Chaoqun, XU Liangyuan, LI Yanfang. Influence of Playmates' Interpersonal Character on Children's Interpersonal Character: The Moderating Role of the Number of Playmates and Child Group Differences[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 628-637.

参考文献

Bandura, A. (Ed.).(1986).Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.7 Prentice-Hall.
Benenson, J. F., Apostoleris, N. H., & Parnass, J. (1997). Age and sex differences in dyadic and group interaction. Developmental Psychology, 33, 538-543.
Berthelon, M., Bettinger, E., Kruger, D. I., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. (2019). The structure of peers:The impact of peer networks on academic achievement. Research in Higher Education, 60, 931-959.
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily:A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179.
Brown, B. B., & Klute, C., (2006). Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 330-348). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
Burk, W. J., Van der Vorst, H., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol intoxication frequency and friendship dynamics:Selection and socialization in early, middle and late adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89-98.
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory:Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.Statistics in Medicine, 32(4), 556-577.
Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Shared virtue:The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 203-213.
Falbo, T. (2012). Only Children:An Updated Review.Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(1), 38-49.
Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence:A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313-335.
Giletta, M., Scholte, R. H., Prinstein, M. J., Engels, R. C., Rabaglietti, E., & Burk, W. J. (2012). Friendship context matters:Examining the domain specificity of alcohol and depression socialization among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(7), 1027-1043.
Gorrese, A., & Ruggieri, R. (2012). Peer attachment:A meta-analytic review of gender and age differences and associations with parent attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 650-672.
Hartup, W.W., & Abecassis, M. (2002). Friends and enemies. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 286-306). Malden, MA:Blackwell.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
Law, B. M.,Shek, D. T., & Ma, C. M. (2013). Validation of family, school, and peer influence on volunteerism scale among adolescents. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(4), 458-466.
Maccoby, E. E. (2002). Gender and group process:A developmental perspective.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 54-58.
Ngai, S. S. Y. (2015). Parental bonding and character strengths among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 317-333.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006a).Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents:The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891-909.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006b). Character strengths and happiness among young children:Content analysis of parental descriptions.Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 323-341.
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being.Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues:A handbook and classification. Oxford University press.
Poldin, O., Valeeva, D., & Yudkevich, M. (2016). Which peers matter:How social ties affect peer-group effects. Research in Higher Education, 57(4), 448-468.
Prinstein, M. J. (2007). Moderators of peer contagion:A longitudinal examination of depression socialization between adolescents and their best friends. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36(2), 159-170.
Scales, P., Benson, P.,Leffert, N., & Blyth, D.A. (2000). The contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27-46.
Shoshani, A., & Slone, M. (2013). Middle school transition from the strengths perspective:Young adolescents' character strengths, subjective well-being, and school adjustment. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1163-1181.
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence.Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531-1543.
VanGoethem, A. A., Van Hoof, A., van Aken, M. A., de Castro, B. O., & Raaijmakers, Q. A. (2014). Socialising adolescent volunteering:How important are parents and friends? Age dependent effects of parents and friends on adolescents' volunteering behaviours. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 94-101.
Véronneau, M. H., & Vitaro, F. (2007). Social experiences with peers and high school graduation:A review of theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 419-445.
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school:Influences on motivation and school adjustment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-203.
Zhang, H. Y., Li, X. Y., & Wang, Y. C. (2016). Influence of character strengths on adolescent depressive symptoms and regulatory effect of gender and age.Chinese General Practice, 1(19), 115-118.
方晓义. (1997). 友伴对青少年吸烟和饮酒行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 13(4), 51-56.
风笑天. (2000). 独生子女青少年的社会化过程及其结果. 中国社会科学, 6, 118-131.
郝玉章, 风笑天. (1997). 中学独生子女社会化的现状——对湖北省五市镇593名中学生的调查分析. 青年研究, 8, 7-15.
游志麒, 张凤娟, 范翠英, 平凡, 周宗奎. (2016). 班级朋友对抑郁的影响:一项社会网络分析. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 339-348.
张凤娟. (2014). 朋友网络背景中的同伴乐观发展:童年中晚期追踪研究(博士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.

相关文章 15

[1]	王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2]	于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3]	陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4]	吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5]	舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7]	范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[8]	张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[9]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[10]	谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[11]	范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[12]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[13]	王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.
[14]	王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.
[15]	冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed