心理发展与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 686-696.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.06.06

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学低年级儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对阅读理解的预测作用

程亚华1, 周婷娜1, 赵英2, 李虹2, 伍新春2   

  1. 1. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波 315211;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 儿童阅读与学习研究中心, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2019-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春,E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目(16YJC190002)。

The Developmental Trajectories of Reading Fluency and Its Predictive Effects on Reading Comprehension in Chinese Primary School Students

CHENG Yahua1, ZHOU Tingna1, ZHAO Ying2, LI Hong2, WU Xinchun2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211;
    2. Research Center of Children's Reading and Learning, Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 对149名小学一年级儿童的阅读流畅性进行历时三年五次的追踪测试,采用潜变量增长模型探索了儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹,并在控制相关变量后,考察了阅读流畅性的起始水平和发展速度对阅读理解的预测作用。结果发现:(1)小学低年级儿童字词阅读流畅性呈非线性发展,其中一年级快速发展,二、三年级时进一步发展,但发展速度变缓,起始水平低的儿童其后发展速度快,表现出补偿模式;句子阅读流畅性呈线性发展,儿童个体之间的差异随时间逐渐增大,表现出马太效应;(2)控制一般认知能力、家庭社会经济地位及相关语言认知技能后,字词阅读流畅性的起始水平和发展速度均可预测儿童三年级时阅读理解水平,而句子阅读流畅性的起始水平不能预测,但发展速度有显著预测作用。结果说明字词阅读流畅性和句子阅读流畅性有不同的发展轨迹和发展模式,在小学低年级阶段,相比句子阅读流畅性,儿童字词阅读流畅性的起始水平对阅读理解有预测作用,且两者的发展速度均对阅读理解有预测作用。

关键词: 阅读流畅性, 阅读理解, 发展轨迹, 潜变量增长模型

Abstract: 149 children in grade one were followed up for three years from grade one entering to grade three. Latent growth modeling was conducted to examine the developmental trajectory of reading fluency and the predictive effects of the initial level and growth rates in reading fluency on reading comprehension after controlling for the related variables. Results indicated that children's word reading fluency increased in a non-linear trajectory, while sentence reading fluency increased in a linear trajectory during the follow-up period. The individual difference of word reading fluency showed a decreasing trend while individual difference increased in sentence reading fluency. The results also showed that initial status and growth rates of word reading fluency made a significant direct contribution to reading comprehension at Time 5 after controlling for the related variables. In addition, initial status of sentence reading fluency did not have the predictive effects on reading comprehension at Time 5. Growth rates of sentence reading fluency, however, made a significant direct contribution to reading comprehension at Time 5. The present findings have an important role in elucidating developmental changes of children's reading fluency. The findings underscore the importance of growth in reading fluency for reading comprehension and add to the literature about the nature of the reading fluency and reading comprehension relationship in Chinese.

Key words: reading fluency, reading comprehension, developmental trajectories, latent growth modeling

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Baker, D. L., Park, Y., & Baker, S. K. (2012). The reading performance of English learners in Grades 1 to 3:The role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251-281.
Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Wu, X., Liu, H., Dong, Q., et al. (2017). Growth of compounding awareness predicts reading comprehension in Chinese students:A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 91-104.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade:Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 7-21.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence:A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction:What, why, and How? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.
Kim, Y. G., Park, C. H., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a "bridge" to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 27(1), 79-99.
Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. (2010). Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 652-667.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310-321.
Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency:Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
Lei, L., Pan, J., Liu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2011). Developmental trajectories of reading development and impairment from ages 3 to 8 years in Chinese children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(2), 212-220.
Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children's character recognition:Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 287-307.
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia-early identification and prevention:Highlights from the Jyväskylä longitudinal study of dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2(4), 330-338.
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders:An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445-463.
Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184-202.
Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J.-E., & Kirby, J. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading:Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 299-319.
PIRLS 2006 台湾报告. 取自 https://sites.google.com/site/reading8learning01/pirls/pirls-2006
Pfost,M., Hattie, J., D rfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2014). Individual differences in reading development:A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 203-244.
Salvador, S. K., Schoeneberger, J., Tingle, L., & Algozzine, B. (2012). Relationship between second grade oral reading fluency and third grade reading. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 341-356.
Seyomour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese:Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27-47.
Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia:Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122-133.
Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. M. (2007). How much growth can we expect? A conditional analysis of R-CBM growth rates by level of performance. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 71-84.
Wang, C., Algozzine, B., Ma, W., & Porfeli, E. (2011). Oral reading rates of second-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 442-454.
Xue, J., Shu, H., Li, H., Li, W., & Tian, X. (2013). The stability of literacy-related cognitive contributions to Chinese character naming and reading fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 433-450.
程亚华, 伍新春. (2018). 小学一年级阅读流畅性对二、三年级阅读理解的预测. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 314-321.
程亚华, 伍新春, 刘红云, 李虹. (2018). 小学低年级儿童口语词汇知识的发展轨迹及其影响因素. 心理学报, 50(2), 206-215.
胡天婷, 陶沙, 徐琴美, 毕鸿燕. (2010). 不同汉字解码技能与小学生阅读理解的关系. 心理发展与教育, 26(2), 144-152.
回懿, 周雪莲, 李宜逊, 德秀齐, 李虹, 刘翔平. (2018). 小学低年级汉语儿童语言能力的发展轨迹:认知能力的预测作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(1), 73-79.
刘源, 赵骞, 刘红云. (2013). 多阶段增长模型的方法比较. 心理学探新, 33(5), 415-422.
刘红云, 张雷. (2005). 追踪数据分析方法及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.
陆爱桃, 张积家. (2006). 阅读流畅性研究及其进展. 心理科学, 29(2), 376-379.
师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34.
王济川, 王小倩, 姜宝法. (2011). 结构方程模型:方法与应用. 北京:高等教育出版社.
魏威, 邓赐平, 李其维. (2018). 学龄早期词语阅读习得对阅读理解能力的预测作用:初始水平和发展速率的贡献. 心理科学, 41(3), 559-564.
张厚粲, 王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 21(2), 113-121.
周雪莲, 程亚华, 李宜逊, 韩春翔, 李虹. (2016). 朗读流畅性在儿童阅读发展中的预测作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 471-477.
[1] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[3] 王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4] 李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[5] 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.
[6] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[7] 林琳, 邱少劼, 刘羽, 杨洋, 杨亚楠, 贾绪计, 徐战胜, 白学军. 青少年早期冲动性的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 339-347.
[8] 张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[9] 周婷娜, 李宜逊, 李虹, 徐钟庚, 张锋, 程亚华. 汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[10] 潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[11] 张豪, 马田雨, 王媛, 李彩娜. 初中生友谊质量与孤独感的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 230-239.
[12] 林文毅, 杨怡, 余圣陶. 知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.
[13] 闫梦格, 李虹, 李宜逊, 周雪莲, 回懿, 程亚华, 伍新春. 识字量和词汇知识在儿童阅读发展中的相对重要性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 311-317.
[14] 赵英, 伍新春, 陈红君. 汉语儿童语素意识对阅读理解的影响:默读流畅性的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 430-438.
[15] 程亚华, 伍新春. 小学一年级阅读流畅性对二、三年级阅读理解的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 314-321.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!