心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 682-691.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.06.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

同伴侵害与人际关系取向人格特质的交叉滞后分析:城市原住儿童与农村随迁儿童的比较

李梦婷1, 范为桥1, 陈欣银2   

  1. 1. 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234;
    2. 宾夕法尼亚大学教育研究生院, 美国 费城 19104-6216
  • 出版日期:2018-11-15 发布日期:2018-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 范为桥,E-mail:fanweiqiao@shnu.edu.cn E-mail:fanweiqiao@shnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家哲学社会科学基金项目(14BSH081)。

A Cross-lagged Study of Peer Victimization and Children's Interpersonal Relatedness Personality Traits: A Comparison Between Urban and Rural Children

LI Mengting1, FAN Weiqiao1, CHEN Xinyin2   

  1. 1. School of Education, Shanghai;Normal University, shanghai:200334;
    2. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104-6216, USA
  • Online:2018-11-15 Published:2018-12-27

摘要: 研究采用间隔两年的追踪设计,分析了477名农村随迁儿童(男生57.10%;2014年时平均年龄为11.54±0.64岁)与245名城市原住儿童(男生50.60%;2014年时平均年龄为11.36±0.51岁)的同伴侵害与和谐性、人际触觉两个人际关系取向人格维度的相互影响。这些儿童分别来自上海市采取融合教育的四所公立初中。他们首次参加本研究时为初中预备年级。交叉滞后分析表明,(1)在原住儿童组,时间1的同伴侵害可以负向预测时间2的和谐性与人际触觉;(2)在随迁儿童组,和谐性与同伴侵害有负向循环作用关系,且时间1的同伴侵害可以负向预测时间2的人际触觉。研究一定程度上揭示了人际人格发展与所处环境(特别是同伴侵害的不利环境)的动态相互作用模式。文章最后讨论了原住儿童与随迁儿童混合编班的融合教育模式对所有城市儿童适应社会转型的现实意义。

关键词: 农村随迁儿童, 城市原住儿童, 同伴侵害, 人际取向人格特质, 交叉滞后分析

Abstract: Although previous studies largely supported that peer victimization correlates with personality that mainly bases on Big Five model focused on intrapersonal dimensions, limited research examined the relationship between peer victimization and interpersonal relatedness personality, effectively highlighted in Chinese context. Our study examined the reciprocal relationship between peer victimization and harmony and social sensitivity, at both rural migrant and urban children with a two-year longitudinal design.
Seven hundred and Twenty-Two Preliminary Junior students, including 245 urban children (50.60% female; Mage=11.36 years old, SD=0.51) and 477 migrant children (57.10% female; Mage=11.54 years old, SD=0.64) from four junior secondary schools in Shanghai, were recruited. Two waves of data collection were conducted with a two-year interval. Peer victimization was assessed by the approach of peer behavior nomination with the Revised Class Play and teacher reports with Teacher-Child Rating scale. Interpersonal relatedness personality (i.e., harmony and social sensitivity) was measured with the Cross-Culture (Chinese) Personality Assessment Inventory for Adolescents.
Peer nomination of peer victimization showed a significant decrease from Wave I to Wave Ⅱ. Migrant group reported higher levels of social sensitivity than did the urban group. Significant negative correlations between peer victimization and both harmony and social sensitivity were supported across both groups. Cross-lagged path analyses were conducted after controlling for gender and SES. Peer-and teacher-rated peer victimization were two indicators of the latent peer victimization. (1) A reciprocal negative effect between peer victimization and harmony was supported at the migrant group. (2) As for the urban group, only the negative effect was significant from peer victimization at Preliminary Junior to harmony at Junior Two. (3) Peer victimization at Preliminary Junior had a negative effect on social sensitivity at Junior Two across the two groups.
Conclusively, the negative influences of peer victimization on children's personality development at the junior school period should be tried to reduce or avoid in the practice of integrated education and school management. For instance, a harmony interpersonal relationship might be beneficial to reducing peer victimization and promoting their adaptation to urban environment. Alternatively, with the social change and urbanization in China, city-lived adolescents including both migrant and native populations should adapt the multi-cultural society and life-styles with open minds.

Key words: rural migrant children, urban native children, peer victimization, interpersonal relatedness personality, cross-lagged analysis

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Ames, M., & Leadbeater, B. (2017). Overweight and isolated:The interpersonal problems of youth who are overweight from adolescence into young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41, 390-404.
Au, A. M. L., Wong, A. S. K., Lai, M. K., & Chan, C. C. H. (2011). Empathy, coping, social support, and mental health in local and migrant adolescents in Beijing. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10, 173-178.
Bojana, D. M., Jasmina, K. S., Valentina, S. T., & Ilija, M. Z. (2016). Empathy and peer violence among adolescents:Moderation effect of gender. School Psychology International, 37, 359-377.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development:Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
Chen, X. (2008). Shyness and unsociability in cultural context. In A. S. LoCoco, K. H. Rubin, & C. Zappulla (Eds.), Social withdrawal in childhood (pp. 143-160). Milan:Unicopli.
Chen, X., Chang, L., Liu, H., & He, Y. (2008). Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement:A longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Development, 79, 235-251
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Li, Z. Y. (1995). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children:A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 31, 531-539.
Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children:A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336-1343.
Chen, X., & Schmidt, L. A. (2015). Temperament and personality. In M. E. Lamb (Vol. Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.) (2015), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science:Socioemotional Processes (Vol. 3, 7th edition) (pp. 152-200). Hoboken, NJ. US:John Wiley & Sons Inc,
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., & Fan, W. (2013). From Chinese to cross-cultural personality inventory:A combined emic-etic approach to the study of personality in culture. In M. J. Gelfand, C. Chiu & Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (vol. 3) (pp. 117-179). New York:Oxford University Press.
Cheung, F. M., Fan, W., & Cheung, S. F. (2017). Indigenous measurement of personality in Asia. In A.T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger Handbook of Personality across Cultures (pp. 105-135). Santa Barbara, CA, USA:ABC-CLIO/Greenwood Praeger.
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593-603.
De Bolle, M., & Tackett, J. L. (2013). Anchoring bullying and victimization in children within a Five-Factor Model-based person-centred framework. European Journal of Personality, 27, 280-289.
Del Rey, R., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 275-281.
Fung, A. L., & Raine, A., (2012). Peer victimization as a risk factor for schizotypal personality in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorder, 26, 428-434.
Heaven, P. C. L., Leeson, P., & Ciarrochi, J. (2009). Personality development at school:Assessing a reciprocal influence model of teachers' evaluations and students' personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 815-821.
Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cohen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C.,et al.(1986). The Teacher-Child Rating Scale:A brief objective measure of elementary children's school problem behaviors and competences. School Psychology Review, 15, 393-409.
Hoglund, W. L. G., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2007). Managing threat:Do social-cognitive processes mediate the link between peer victimization and adjustment problems in early adolescence? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 525-540.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Malcolm, K. T. (2007). The importance of conscientiousness in adolescent interpersonal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 368-383.
Kawabata, Y., Youngblood, J., & Hamaguchi, Y. (2014). Preadolescents' borderline personality features in a non-Western urban context:Concurrent and longitudinal associations with physical and relational aggression, friendship exclusivity and peer victimization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 219-228.
Kingsbury, M., Liu, J., Li, D., Coplan, R. J., & Chen, X. (2016). Assessment and implications of coping styles in response to a social stressor among early Adolescents in China. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 222-250. doi:10.1177/0272431614561262
Knack, J. M., Jacquot, C., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Malcolm, K. T. (2013). Importance of having agreeable friends in adolescence (especially when you are not). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2401-2413.
Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education:An International Journal, 15, 41-58.
Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I. P., Koukoutsis, N. D., & Markos, A. (2016). Peer victimization and depression in Greek preadolescents:Personality and attachment as moderators. Personal Relationships, 23, 280-295.
Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (editors-in-chief) and R. M. Lerner (vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1:Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 1-17, 43-61, 542-548). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Leadbeater, B., & Hoglund, W. (2006). Changing the social contexts of peer victimization. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15, 21-26.
Malti T., Perren, S., & Buchmann, M. (2010). Children's peer victimization, empathy, and emotional symptoms. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 98-113.
Masten A S, Morison P, & Pellegrini D S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533
McDonnell, J., Stahl, D., Day, F., McGuire, P., & Valmaggia, L. R. (2017). Interpersonal sensitivity in those at clinical high risk for psychosis mediates the association between childhood bullying victimisation and paranoid ideation:A virtual reality study. Schizophrenia Research, doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.029
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 169-178.
Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 63, 539-569.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children:A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244-252.
Reitz, A. K., Zimmermann, J., Hutteman, R., Specht, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2014). How peers make a difference:The role of peer groups and peer relationships in personality development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 279-288.
Steinberg, L. (2014). Adolescence (10th ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
Sugimura, N., & Rudolph, K. D. (2012). Temperamental differences in children's reactions to peer victimization. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 41, 314-328.
Williford, A., Boulton, A., Forrest-Bank, S., Bender, K., Dieterich, W., & Jenson, J. (2016). The effect of bullying and victimization on cognitive empathy development during the transition to middle school. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45, 525-541.
Xie, Q., Fan, W., Wang, P., & Cheung, F. M. (2016). Personality and parenting style as predictors of life satisfaction among Chinese secondary students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 423-432.
Yang, K. S. (2006). Indigenous personality research:The Chinese case. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology:Understanding people in context (pp. 285-314). New York, NY:Springer.
Ye, Z., Chen, L., Harrison, S. E., Guo, H., Li, X., & Lin, D. (2016). Peer victimization and depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant children in china:the protective role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-10.
范为桥,张妙清,张树辉,梁觉. (2008). 香港中学生人格特质的性别差异及其发展性分析. 心理学报, 40, 1002-1012.
范为桥, 张妙清, 张建新, 张树辉. (2011). 兼顾文化共通性与特殊性的人格研究:CPAI及其跨文化应用. 心理学报, 43, 1418-1429.
冯帅章, 陈媛媛, 金嘉捷. (2017). 城市的未来——流动儿童教育的上海模式. 上海:上海财经大学出版社.
郭海英, 陈丽华, 叶枝, 潘瑾, 林丹华. (2017). 流动儿童同伴侵害的特点及与内化问题的循环作用关系:一项追踪研究. 心理学报, 49, 336-348.
何玲, 李兵. (2007). 中国流动儿童政策分析. 人口研究, 31, 71-80.
纪林芹, 魏星, 陈亮, 张文新. (2012). 童年晚期同伴关系不利与儿童的攻击行为:自我概念与同伴信念的中介作用.心理学报, 44, 1479-1489.
上海市教育委员会. (2008).上海市教育委员会关于进一步做好本市农民工同住子女义务教育工作的若干意见. 沪教委基(2008)3号.
上海市统计局,国家统计局上海调查总队. (2017). 上海统计年鉴. 北京:中国统计出版社.
师保国, 王芳, 刘霞, 康义然. (2014). 国内流动儿童心理研究:回顾与展望. 中国特殊教育, (11), 68-72.
叶枝, 柴晓运, 郭海英, 翁欢欢, 林丹华. (2017). 流动性、教育安置方式和心理弹性对流动儿童孤独感的影响:一项追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 33, 595-604.
袁晓娇,方晓义,刘杨,蔺秀云.(2012). 流动儿童压力应对方式与抑郁感、社交焦虑的关系:一项追踪研究.心理发展与教育, 28, 283-291.
邹泓, 刘艳, 张文娟, 蒋索, 周晖, 余益兵. (2015).青少年社会适应的保护性与危险性因素的评估.心理发展与教育, 31, 29-36.
[1] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[2] 纪林芹, 邹小慧, 张露露, 张良. 儿童青少年欺凌行为与冷酷无情、共情的关系:交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 532-541.
[3] 纪林芹, 张蒙, 董美慧, 潘斌, 张文新. 童年晚期至青少年早期攻击和同伴侵害的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 701-709.
[4] 陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[5] 吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[6] 董及美, 周晨, 侯亚楠, 赵蕾, 魏淑华. 留守初中生同伴侵害与攻击性的关系:链式多重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 615-623.
[7] 陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[8] 杨晓霞, 陈亮, 曹衍淼, 毕馨文, 陈光辉, 张文新. 青少年早期同伴侵害的亚类别及其稳定性:个体定向的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 146-156.
[9] 许阳, 张卫, 喻承甫, 苏萍, 刘莎, 甄霜菊. 父母体罚与青少年焦虑抑郁的关系:同伴侵害的中介效应与亲子关系的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 457-467.
[10] 陈永香, 刘晓薇. 幸福者更适应,还是适应者更幸福?——基于大学新生的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 378-384.
[11] 陈圆圆, 张卫, 朱键军, 喻承甫, 张一波, 卢镇辉. 同伴侵害对青少年问题性网络游戏使用的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 733-744.
[12] 江艳平, 张卫, 喻承甫, 鲍振宙, 刘莎. 同伴排斥与青少年早期饮酒行为:同伴侵害和不良同伴的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 738-745.
[13] 苑春永, 邵爱惠, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 青少年儿童不爱社交、同伴排斥和同伴侵害的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 16-23.
[14] 董会芹, 纪林芹, 陈亮, 张文新. 3~5岁儿童对同伴侵害归因的特征研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 225-231.
[15] 赵金霞. 儿童中期亲子依恋与焦虑症状的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 405-412.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!