高中生学校生活中的情感体验:基于日重现法的研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用日重现法对133名高中生学校生活中的情感体验进行实描研究,考察了高中生在学校生活中的活动、活动场所、互动对象及与之相应的各种情感体验的日波动模式。结果如下:(1)高中生在一天中的绝大多数活动、场所以及人际互动中均表现为积极情感的体验强度大于消极情感;(2)大部分积极情感以及疲劳的体验强度都表现为在晚睡前达到一天中的最高点,大部分消极情感体验都在该时段降至一天中的最低点;(3)全天都体验到较强烈的胜任感,中午的体验强度最大,早晨的体验强度最低。

关键词: 高中生, 学校生活体验, 日重现法(DRM)

Abstract: Daily rhythm patterns of the affect experiences,corresponding to activities,locations and interactive partners in school lives,were investigated with the Day Reconstruction Method(DRM).133 senior high school students,whose life experiences were recorded,were involved in this study,Four main results were found:(1) Senior high school students showed stronger positive experience than negative ones in most activities,locations and interaction throughout the day at school.(2)Most of the positive affects and intensity of tiredness reached the peak before they went to bed.In the contrast,most of the negative affects intensity fell into the lowest point at the same time.(3)They experienced strong sense of competence during the whole day.Its intensity was at the lowest point in the morning whereas it reached the peak at noon.

Key words: senior high school students, experience of school life, day reconstruction method

中图分类号:

B844.2

田丽丽. 高中生学校生活中的情感体验:基于日重现法的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 473-481.

TIAN Li-li. Experience of School Life in Senior High School Students: Based on the Day Reconstruction Method[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(5): 473-481.

参考文献

[1] Bhattacharyya,M.R.,Whitehead,D.L.,Rakhit,R.,&Steptoe,A.(2008).Depressed mood,positive affect,and heart rate variability in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.Psychosomatic Medicine,70(9),1020-1027.
[2] Diener,E.,Fujita,F.,&Sandvik,E.(1994).What subjective well-being researchers can tell emotion researchers about affect.In N.Frijda(Ed.),Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the International Society for Research on Emotion.Storrs,CT:ISRE Publications,30-42.
[3] Hill,J.P.,&Holmbeck,G.(1986).Attachment and autonomy during adolescence.In G.Whitehurst(Ed.),Annals of Cchild Development(Vol.3).Greenwich,CT:JAI,145-189.
[4] Kahneman,D.,Krueger,A.B.,Schkade,D.A.,Schwarz,N.S.,&Stone,A.A.(2004).A survey method for characterizing daily life experience:the Day Reconstruction Method(DRM).Science,306(5702),1776-1780.
[5] Kopperud,K.H.,&Vitterso,J.(2008).Distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being:Results from a day reconstruction study among Norwegian jobholders.Journal of Positive Psychology,3(3),174-181.
[6] Krueger,A.B.,&Stone,A.A.(2008).Assessment of pain:A community-based diary survey in the USA.Lancet,371(9623),1519-1525.
[7] Muris P.,Schmidt,H.,Merckelbach,H.,&Schouten,E.(2001).The structure of negative emotions in adolescents.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,29(4),331-337.
[8] Paxton,R.J.,Valois,R.F.,Watkins,K.W.,Huebner,E.S.,&Drane,J.W.(2007).Sociodemographic differences in depressed mood:Results from a nationally representative sample of high school adolescents.The Journal of School Health,77(4),180-186.
[9] Pekrun,R.,Goetz,T.,Titz,W.,&Perry,P.R.(2002).Academic emotions in students'self-regulated learning and achievement:A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37(2),91-105.
[10] Ruban,L.M.,McCoach,D.B.,McGuire,J.M.,&Reis S.M.(2003).The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,36(3),270-286.
[11] Ryan,R.M.&Connell,J.P.(1989).Perceived locus of causality and internalization:examining reasons for acting in two domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(5),749-761.
[12] Schutz,P.A.,&Lanehart,S.L.(2002).Introduction:Emotions in education.Educational Psychologist,37(2),67-68.
[13] Scollon,C.N.,Chue,K.P.,&Diener,E.D.(2003).Experience sampling:promises and pitfalls,strengths and weaknesses.Journal of Happiness Studies,4(1),5-34.
[14] Srivastava,S.,Angelo,K.M.,&Vallereux,S.R.(2008).Extraversion and positive affect:A day reconstruction study of person-environment transactions.Journal of Research in Personality,42,1613-1618.
[15] Stone,A.A.,Schwarz,J.E.,Schwarz,N.,Krueger A.,&Kahneman D.(2006).A population approach to the study of emotion:diurnal rhythms of a working day examined with the Day Reconstruction Method.Emotion,6(1),139-149.
[16] Vedder,P.,Boekaerts,M.,&Seegers,G.(2005).Perceived social support and well-being in school;the role of students'ethnicity.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,34(3),269-278.
[17] White,M.P.,&Dolan,P.(2009).Accounting for the richness of daily activities.Psychological Science,20(8),1000-1008.
[18] 董妍,俞国良.(2007).青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用.心理学报,39(5),852-860.
[19] 鞠亮,邹泓,李一茗.(2004).同伴冲突解决策略及其影响因素的研究进展.心理发展与教育,20(2),84-88.
[20] 李冬梅.(2005).青少年心境动态发展特点及不同调节策略对其心境变化影响的研究.首都师范大学博士学位论文,3-84.
[21] 李艳.(2005).高中生积极情绪调查及认知—行为疗法干预研究.河南大学研究生硕士学位论文,3-56.
[22] 罗伏生,沈丹,张珊明.(2009).青少年焦虑和抑郁情绪特征研究.中国临床心理学杂志,17(4),468-470.
[23] 吴波,方晓义,李一飞.(2003).青少年自主研究综述.心理发展与教育,19(1),89-96.
[24] 俞国良,董妍.(2005).学业情绪研究及其对学生发展的意义.教育研究,309(10),39-43.

相关文章 15

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	杨宝琰, 柳玉姣. 元刻板印象威胁对县城农村高中生学校归属感的影响:身份认同整合和自我肯定的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 645-653.
[3]	张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[4]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[5]	徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[6]	罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[7]	楚啸原, 理原, 王兴超, 王玉慧, 雷雳. 家庭收入与高中生幸福感:社会支持与性别因素的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 478-485.
[8]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.
[9]	顾婷玉, 盖笑松, 王国霞, 刘芳晴. 高中生价值观对学校投入的影响:未来目标和动机内化程度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 68-75.
[10]	李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[11]	陈英敏, 刘忠花, 李亮, 曲艺, 韩磊, 高峰强. 高中生羞怯与学业适应的关系:学业求助的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 322-329.
[12]	赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹, 周宗奎. 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响:责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 257-263.
[13]	聂瑞虹, 周楠, 张宇驰, 方晓义. 人际关系与高中生内外化问题的关系:自尊的中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 708-718.
[14]	袁竞驰, 于芳荣, 田录梅. 感觉寻求、同伴压力对高中生烟酒使用的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 486-494.
[15]	王帆, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 唐芹. 家庭环境与高中生发展:自主的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 585-593.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed