师生关系对小学生创造性的作用:一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.02.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以658名儿童为被试,采用测验法和问卷法考察师生关系与小学生创造性思维的关系,同时探析创新自我效能感的中介作用,以及该作用是否受到开放性人格的调节。结果发现:(1)师生关系对小学生创造性思维、创新效能感均有显著的正向预测作用;(2)创新效能感在师生关系与小学生创造性思维总分、流畅性和独特性得分之间起完全中介作用;(3)开放性可以调节创新效能感对小学生创造性思维的作用,开放性高时效能感的中介效应显著,而开放性低时该效应不显著。这些结果对于综合解释教育过程中环境与个体因素对创造性的作用路径与机制具有重要意义。

关键词: 师生关系, 创造性思维, 创新自我效能感, 开放性, 小学生

Abstract: Based on testing and questionnaire method, the present study conducted among 658 primary school students to investigate the impact of teacher-student relationships on children's creative thinking and to explore the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy as well as the moderating effect of openness to experience. The results showed that:(1) Teacher-student relationships significantly positively predicted children's creative thinking as well as creative self-efficacy; (2) Creative self-efficacy played a completely mediating role between teacher-student relationships and primary school students' creative thinking; (3) The mediation of creative self-efficacy was moderated by openness to experience. In terms of high openness to experience, creative self-efficacy played a mediating role. But for individuals with low openness to experience, the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy was not significant. These findings contribute to our understanding of a comprehensive interpretation of both environmental and individual factors' impact on creativity.

Key words: teacher-student relationships, creative thinking, creative self-efficacy, openness to experience, primary school students

中图分类号:

B844

师保国, 王黎静, 徐丽, 刘霞. 师生关系对小学生创造性的作用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.

SHI Baoguo, WANG Lijing, XU Li, LIU Xia. Effects of Teacher-student Relationships on Students' Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.

参考文献

Abraham, A. (2015). Gender and creativity:an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain imaging and behavior, 1-10. doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York:Freeman.
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior:can the big five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores?. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 90-97.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy:Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1988). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. E. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed). Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed.). New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. E. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed). Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed.). New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48.
Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance:the mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2), 187-199.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person:a systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). England:Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity:Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in Education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. M?nks, R. F. Subotnik, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and talent (pp. 81-94). New York:Elsevier.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods:an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
Fink, A., & Benedek, M. (2014). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 111-123.
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity:The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York:Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1-22.
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity:Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480-487.
Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies:Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and social psychology review, 9(2), 131-155.
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. Journal of personality, doi:10.1111/jopy.12156.
Kerr, B., & McKay, R. (2013). Searching for tomorrow's innovators:Profiling creative adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 21-32.
King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Royles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research In Personality, 30, 189-203.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development moral stages and the idea of justice. New York:Harper & Row.
Li, W. F., Li, X. T., Huang, L. J., Kong, X. Z., Yang, W. J., Wei, D. T.,... Liu, J. (2014). Brain structure links trait creativity to openness to experience. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 10(2), 191-198.
Lucas-Molina, B., Williamson, A. A., Pulido, R., & Pérez-Albéniz, A. (2015). Effects of teacher-student relationships on peer harassment:A multilevel study. Psychology in the Schools, 52(3), 298-315.
Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory. New York:Springer.
Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance:Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59-74.
McCrae, R. R., & Ingraham, L. J. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265.
Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity:mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 53(5), 894-910.
Pearroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Sánchez, J., & Ripoll, P. (2015). How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams:A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 9-16.
Pervin, L. A. (2003). The science of personality. New York:Oxford University Press.
Puente-Díaz, R. (2015). Creative Self-Efficacy:An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications. The Journal of psychology, 1-25. doi:10.1080/00223980.2015. 1051498.
Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Westport, CT:Ablex Publishing.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity:The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity:The science of human innovation. New York:Oxford University Press.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709-1721.
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I.,... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks:Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68-85.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 607-627.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human development, 34(1), 1-31.
Tan, C. C., & Holub, S. C. (2015). Emotion Regulation Feeding Practices Link Parents' Emotional Eating to Children's Emotional Eating:A Moderated Mediation Study. Journal of pediatric psychology, 40(7), 657-663.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy:Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293.
Torres, L., & Taknint, J. T. (2015). Ethnic microaggressions, traumatic stress symptoms, and latino depression:a moderated mediational model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(3),393-401.
Wilkins, J. (2014). Good Teacher-Student Relationships:Perspectives of Teachers in Urban High Schools. American Secondary Education, 43(1), 52-68.
方杰, 张敏强, 顾红磊, 梁东梅. (2014). 基于不对称区间估计的有调节的中介模型检验. 心理科学进展, 22(10), 1660-1668.
顾远东, 彭纪生. (2010). 组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响:创新自我效能感的中介作用. 南开管理评论,13(1), 30-41.
洪素萍, 林姗如. (2004). What ever you say I can do it"学生创意自我效能量表" 之编制. 台湾第二届"创新与创造力"研讨会.
李海燕, 胡卫平, 申继亮. (2010). 学校环境对初中生人格特征与创造性科学问题提出能力关系的影响.心理科学, 5(5), 1154-1158.
刘万伦, 沃建中. (2005). 师生关系与中小学生学校适应性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 87-90.
黄希庭. (1997). 心理学. 上海:上海教育出版社.
李金德, 余嘉元. (2011). 教师创新支持行为, 学生创新自我效能感和创造性思维的关系研究. 宁波大学学报:教育科学版, 33(2), 44-48.
刘桂荣, 张景焕, 王晓玲. (2010). 创造力游乐场理论及其实践涵义.心理科学进展, 4, 679-684.
孙鹏, 邹泓, 杜瑶琳.(2014).青少年创造性思维的特点及其对日常创造性行为的影响:人格的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 30(4), 355-362.
孙阳, 邱阳. (2010). 师生关系:初中生学校适应的支持源. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2, 157-160.
田友谊. (2007). 创造教育环境研究(博士学位论文).华中师范大学, 武汉.
王立娜, 钱美华, 申继亮, 安巧文. (2006). 教师的创造性内隐观及其对教师培训的启示. 教师教育研究, 18(1), 20-23.
王晓玲, 张景焕, 初玉霞, 刘桂荣. (2009). 小学儿童家庭环境, 创意自我效能与创造力的关系. 心理学探新, 29(5), 46-50.
向小平, 张春妹, 邹泓. (2006). 小学生自我概念的发展特点及其与人格的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 14(3), 294-296.
张景焕, 王亚男, 初玉霞, 徐希铮. (2011). 三种压力与创意自我效能感对创造力的影响. 心理科学, 34(4), 993-998.
张晓, 陈会昌. (2008). 关系因素与个体因素在儿童早期社会能力中的作用. 心理发展与教育, 24(4), 19-24.
张勇, 龙立荣. (2013). 绩效薪酬对雇员创造力的影响, 人-工作匹配和创造力自我效能的作用. 心理学报, 45(3), 363-376.
赵千秋. (2012). 学校环境、创造性自我效能与初中生科学创造力的关系(硕士学位论文).陕西师范大学, 陕西.
周晖, 钮丽丽, 邹泓. (2000). 中学生人格五因素问卷的编制. 心理发展与教育, 16(1), 48-54.
邹泓, 屈智勇, 叶苑. (2007). 中小学生的师生关系与其学校适应. 心理发展与教育, 23(4), 77-82.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[2]	李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度：师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[3]	辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[4]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[5]	张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[6]	李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响：经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[7]	汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康：情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[8]	李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[9]	沈怡佳, 张国华, 何健康, 罗丽兰, 韩锦涛, 江波. 父母学习陪伴与小学生学业不良的关系:亲子学业沟通的中介作用和学习负担的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[10]	楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[11]	罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[12]	吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[13]	高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[14]	张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[15]	郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.