自我控制可以抵御不良示范性规范对初中生环保行为的影响吗?

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.01.14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究检验不良示范性规范对初中生环保行为的影响是否受其自我控制的调节。研究1通过假设情境操纵示范性规范,测量初中生的自我控制能力和环保意愿;研究2在实验室情境下同时操纵示范性规范和初中生的自我控制状态,并测量其环保行为。结果表明,不良示范性规范显著降低初中生的环保意愿及环保行为;特质性和状态性自我控制水平越高,初中生的环保意愿就越高,其环保行为也越多;更重要的是,自我控制并不能有效抵御不良示范性规范对初中生环保意愿和环保行为的消极影响。

关键词: 示范性规范, 自我控制, 环保行为, 初中生

Abstract: Negative descriptive norms affect individuals' pro-environmental behavior, yet whether self-control can resist the effect of negative descriptive norms is unknown. Therefore, we explored if self-control moderates the relation between negative descriptive norms and pro-environmental intention and behavior, based on a sample of middle school students in Beijing. In Study 1, 376 participants completed a questionnaire containing self-control ability and pro-environmental intention (which was measured through a hypothetical scenario with literal descriptive norms manipulation). In Study 2, a laboratory experiment was conducted and 168 participants were recruited. Self-control state was manipulated through ego depletion task (ego-depletion group vs. control group), and descriptive norms were manipulated by setting the environment of the laboratory (very dirty vs. normal). Also the participants' pro-environmental behavior (taking away plastic packing bag) was measured. The results showed that, negative descriptive norms decreased the participants' pro-environmental intention and behavior; both trait and state self-control positively predicted the participants' pro-environmental intention and behavior; however, self-control did not moderate the relation between negative descriptive norms and pro-environmental intention and behavior. That being said, self-control could not resist the effect of negative descriptive norms on middle school students' pro-environmental behavior.

Key words: descriptive norms, self-control, pro-environmental behavior, middle school students

中图分类号:

B844

傅鑫媛, 方秀英, 寇彧. 自我控制可以抵御不良示范性规范对初中生环保行为的影响吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 106-113.

FU Xinyuan, FANG Xiuying, KOU Yu. Can Self-control Resist the Effect of Negative Descriptive Norms on Middle School Students' Pro-environmental Behavior?[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(1): 106-113.

参考文献

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library:Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 18-28.

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.

Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Ego depletion and the self's executive function. In A. Tesser & R. Felson (Eds.) Psychological perspectives on the self and identity (pp. 9-33). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion:Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.

Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence:Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct:Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.

de Ridder, D. T., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76-99.

DeBono, A., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2011). Rude and inappropriate:The role of self-control in following social norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 136-146.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K.,D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm:A revised NEP scale. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen:status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.

Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior:A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.

Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2000). Of wealth and death:Materialism, mortality salience, and consumption behavior. Psychological Science, 11(4), 348-351.

Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation:A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 199-214.

Lönnqvist, J. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Walkowitz, G. (2014). Moral hypocrisy:impression management or self-deception? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 53-62.

Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524-537.

Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2003). An experimental investigation of deterrence:Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41(1), 167-194.

Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime:A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931-964.

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J., Cialdini, R., Goldstein, N., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429-434.

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.

Tomlinson, K. L., & Brown, S. A. (2012). Self-medication or social learning? A comparison of models to predict early adolescent drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 37(2), 179-186.

Vohs, D. K., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, J. N. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation:Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 632-657.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

董蕊, 张力为, 彭凯平, 喻丰, 柴方圆. (2013). 自我损耗研究方法述评. 心理科学, 36(04), 994-997.

王红姣, 卢家楣. (2004). 中学生自我控制能力问卷的编制及其调查. 心理科学, 27(6), 1447-1482.

韦庆旺, 孙健敏. (2013). 对环保行为的心理学解读——规范焦点理论述评. 心理科学进展, 21(04), 751-760.

张卫东, 刁静, Schick, C. J. (2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量:PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, 27(1), 77-79.

相关文章 15

[1]	张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响：睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[2]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[3]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[4]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[5]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[6]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[7]	熊婕, 范翠英, 魏华, 杨秀娟, 连帅磊. 正念对网络欺负的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 752-760.
[8]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[9]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[10]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[11]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[12]	蔡雪斌, 桂守才, 唐易齐, 张硕, 许明星. 父母教养方式对青少年心理复原力的影响：自我控制与调节聚焦的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 505-512.
[13]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[14]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[15]	丁倩, 王兆琪, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 越“八卦”越沉迷:人际好奇与大学生社交网站成瘾倾向的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 118-125.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed