4～7岁儿童基于不同可信度特质和情景的信任判断

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以120名4～7岁儿童为研究对象, 采用改编后的对偶选择范式, 探讨儿童基于两种不同的可信度特质(善良和能力)和两个与信任有关的情景进行的信任判断能力。结果显示:(1)4~7岁儿童在善良情景正确判断率都高于随机水平, 而在能力情景中, 仅6岁和7岁儿童的正确率显著高于随机水平; (2)6岁儿童虽然已经具备依据可信度特质和情景做出正确的信任判断的能力, 但是在善意情景中的信任判断能力要好于在能力情景中的信任判断能力, 而7岁儿童在能力情景和善意情景中的信任判断能力则没有显著差异;(3)同时考虑两种可信度特质和情景时, 5～7 岁儿童的正确率高于了随机水平, 并且6、7岁儿童的正确率要显著高于5岁儿童。这些结果表明儿童到了5岁才初步发展出同时考虑可信度特质和情景进行信任判断的能力, 直到7岁这一能力才相对成熟和稳定。

关键词: 可信度特质, 情景, 信任

Abstract: The study was aimed to investigate children's ability to make trust judgment based on two different trustworthiness traits (benevolence and competence) and trust-related scenarios. 120 children aged 4 to 7 were included and the adapted dual choice paradigm was used in the study. The results showed that:(1) In the scenario related to benevolence, the judgment accuracy of 4 to 7 year-old children was significantly higher than the random level. However, in the scenario related to competence, only 6-year-old and 7-year-old children's judgment accuracy was significantly higher than the random level; (2) Based on their understanding of trustworthiness traits and trust-related scenarios, 6-year-old children already had the ability to make the right judgment of trust. Even so, these children made better judgments in the scenario related to benevolence rather than in the scenario related to competence. However, 7-year-old children did not show significant difference in both scenarios; (3) When taking both the trustworthiness traits and scenarios into consideration, 5 to 7 year-old children's judgment accuracy was significantly higher than the random level. Moreover, when comparing the judgment accuracy of children of different ages, both 6-year-old children and 7-year-old children did significantly better than 5-year-old children. These results suggest that when children up to 5 years old, they begin to develop the ability of considering both the trustworthiness traits and scenarios when making trust judgment. Furthermore, this kind of ability become mature and stable when children up to 7 years old.

Key words: Trustworthiness trait, Scenario, Trust

中图分类号:

B844.1

周海丽, 周晖. 4～7岁儿童基于不同可信度特质和情景的信任判断[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 570-576.

ZHOU Hai-li, ZHOU Hui. 4- to 7-Year-olds' Trust Judgment Based on Trustee's Trustworthiness Traits and Scenarios[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(6): 570-576.

参考文献

Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., & Trueman, M. (2009). The early childhood generalized trust belief scale.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,24(2), 175-185.
Birch, S., Luca, S., Frampton, K., Vauthier, S., & Bloom, P. (2005). Children's assessments of what others know:the effects on learning.Poster presented at the Biannual Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
Cain, K. M., Heyman, G. D., & Walker, M. E. (1997). Preschoolers'ability to make dispositional predictions within and across domains. Social Development,6(1), 53-75.
Charles, W. K. (2002). Children's prediction of consistency in people's actions.Cognition,84, 237-265.
Clément, F., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. (2004). The ontogenesis of trust.Mind & Language,19(4), 360-379.
Corriveau, K. H., Meints, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Early tracking of informant accuracy and inaccuracy.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,27(2), 331-342.
Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information.Developmental Science,12(1), 188-193.
Danovitch, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2007). Choosing between hearts and minds:Children's understanding of moral advisors. Cognitive Development,22(1), 110-123.
Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations.Personnel Review,35(5), 557-588.
Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Children assess informant reliability using bystanders' non-verbal cues.Developmental Science,11(5), 771-777.
Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults Don't Always Know Best Preschoolers Use Past Reliability Over Age When Learning New Words.Psychological Science,17(9), 757-758.
Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2007). The basis of epistemic trust:Reliable testimony or reliable sources?.Episteme:A Journal of Social Epistemology,4(3), 264-284.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of management review,20(3), 709-734.
Mascaro, O., & Sperber, D. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception.Cognition,112(3), 367-380.
Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants.Developmental psychology,43(5), 1216.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all:A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of management review,23(3), 393-404.
Vanderbilt, K. E., Liu, D., & Heyman, G. D. (2011). The development of distrust.Child Development,82(5), 1372-1380.
李庆功, 徐芬, 周小梅.(2012). 3～5岁儿童基于能力特质进行信任判断的策略及其发展.心理发展与教育, 2,140-144.
杜燕红.(2006). 儿童特质理解发展的特点与教育对策研究. 华东师范大学.硕士学位论文.
王美芳.(2003). 儿童人格特质概念的研究方法(J).心理科学进展, 1l(4),417-422.
张建新, 张妙清,梁觉. (2000). 殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用.心理学报,32(3), 311-316.
张兰萍,周晖. (2009). 幼儿基于信息判断的选择性信任的发展——其持续性及与人际信任的关系.心理发展与教育,25(3), 9-14.
张琴,李红. (2010). 儿童特质推理中的信息利用.社会心理科学,(005), 3-7.

相关文章 15

[1]	项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[2]	诸钟烨, 谢于宏, 刘雷. 正负参照点下性别和损益情景对大学生延迟折扣的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 618-625.
[3]	田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[4]	龙翼婷, 姜英杰, 缴润凯. 编码和提取水平对儿童绑定加工发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 761-767.
[5]	刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[6]	王沛, 刘雨婷, 梁雅君, 谈晨皓. 关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 406-413.
[7]	李庆功, 张雯雨, 孙捷元, 马凤玲. 8~12岁儿童同伴信任的发展:特质可信度和面孔可信度的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 38-44.
[8]	童钰, 王福兴, 李卉. 信息提供者的先前准确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 257-266.
[9]	易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[10]	姜英杰, 金雪莲, 龙翼婷. 儿童情景记忆绑定加工:研究范式、发展特点及影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 246-253.
[11]	陈丽君, 王欣, 赵陵波, 陈昕, 王益文. 面孔二态性对学前儿童信任行为的影响——来自人格标签的解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 513-522.
[12]	周文佳, 苏曼, 周楚. 老年人对情绪性事件的情景模拟:回忆过去与想象未来[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 304-313.
[13]	刘国芳. 父母的经济人信念对自身信任及儿童信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 21-27.
[14]	刘岩, 王静, 张晓燕. 幼儿的自我投射能力对情景预见的影响:来自典型发展儿童和孤独症谱系障碍儿童的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 649-657.
[15]	马小凤, 周爱保, 杨小娥. 线索强度:检验提取练习效应内部机制的重要变量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 313-320.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed