心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 160-168.

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师情绪智力和工作绩效的关系:工作家庭促进和主动行为的中介作用

侯敏1,2, 江琦1,2, 陈潇1,2, 朱梦音1,2, 闫秀峰3, 向岭4   

  1. 1. 西南大学心理健康教育研究中心, 重庆 400715;
    2. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715;
    3. 大同市教育局, 大同 037000;
    4. 彭水县教师进修学校, 重庆 409600
  • 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 江琦,E-mail:jiangqi@swu.edu.cn E-mail:jiangqi@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科规划项目:流动儿童社会性发展问题及对策研究(09XJAXLX001).

Teacher’s Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance:The Mediating Roles of Work-family enrichment and Active Behaviors

HOU Min1,2, JIANG Qi1,2, CHEN Xiao1,2, ZHU Meng-yin1,2, YAN Xiu-feng3, XIANG Ling4   

  1. 1. Mental Health Research Center of Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    2. Faculty of Psychological Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    3. Bureau of Education in Datong, Datong 037000;
    4. Peng Shui Teachers Training School, Chongqing 409600
  • Online:2014-03-15 Published:2014-03-15

摘要: 采用整群抽样法对630名中小学教师进行调查,考察教师情绪智力与工作绩效之间的关系,以及工作家庭促进和主动行为在其中的中介作用。结果发现:(1)教师情绪智力、工作促进家庭、家庭促进工作和主动行为与工作绩效呈显著正相关;(2)教师情绪智力对工作绩效具有直接的正向预测作用,同时还通过家庭促进工作和主动行为的多重中介作用对工作绩效产生影响;(3)高低情绪智力对工作绩效的影响机制不同,低情绪智力通过家庭促进工作的部分中介作用影响教师工作绩效,高情绪智力通过家庭促进工作和主动行为的完全多重中介作用影响教师工作绩效;(4)工作家庭促进中工作促进家庭维度在教师情绪智力影响工作绩效中没有显著中介作用。

关键词: 情绪智力, 工作家庭促进, 主动行为, 工作绩效, 教师, 多重中介

Abstract: This study used data collected from a sample of 630 primary and secondary school teachers to explore the relations among emotional intelligence, work-family enrichment, active behaviors and job performance. Results of the latent structure equation modeling showed (1) significant positive correlations existed between emotional intelligence, work-to-family enrichment, family-to-work enrichment, active behaviors and job performance;(2) teacher's emotional intelligence could directly predict job performance, as well as family-to-work enrichment and active behaviors mediated the associations between teacher's emotional intelligence and job performance;(3) EI-specific models found some emotional intelligence differences among teachers. Family-to-work enrichment played a partly intermediary role in low emotional intelligence and job performance, while family-to-work enrichment and active behaviors completely mediated high emotional intelligence and job performance;(4) work-to-family enrichment didn't reveal a significant prediction on job performance.

Key words: emotional intelligence, work-family enrichment, active behaviors, job performance, teachers, multiple intermediate effect

中图分类号: 

  • G443
Aryee, S., Srinivas, E. S., & Tan, H. H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132-146.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G.(2006). Measuring the positive side of the work-family interface: Development and validation of a work-family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131-164.
Cunningham, C.J. L., & Rosa, G. M. D. L. (2008). The interactive effects of proactive personality and work-family interference on well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 271-282.
Eby, L. T., Maher, C. P., & Butts, M. M. (2009). The intersection of work and family life: The role of affect. The Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 599-622.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37-63.
Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive effect during the work day. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94-111.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Jawahar, I. M., Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Rahn, D. L. (2012). Differential effect of inter-role conflict on proactive individual' s experience of burnout. Journal of Business and Psychology , 27(2), 243-254.
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54-78.
Kafetsios, K., & Zampetakis, L. A. (2008). Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: Testing the mediatory role of positive and negative affect at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 712-722.
Karim, J., & Weisz, R. (2011). Emotions at work: the role of emotional intelligence and emotional labor in predicting work-family conflict, psychological distress, and life satisfaction. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(3), 29-44.
Kong, F., Zhao, J.J., & You, X. Q. (2012). Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in Chinese university students: The mediating role of self-esteem and social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 1039-1043.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey, & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications(pp. 3-31). New York: Basic Books.
Moreno-Jiménez, B., Mayo, M., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Geurts, S., Rodríguez-Muoz, A., & Garrosa, E. (2008). Effcets of work-family Conflict on employee' s well-being: The moderating role of recovery expriences. IE Business School Working Paper, 4, 1-18.
Motowidlo, S.J., & Vanscotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task-performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
Namasivayam, K., & Zhao, X. Y. (2007). An investigation of the moderating effects of organizational commitment on the relationships between work-family conflict and job satisfaction among hospitality employees in India. Tourism Management, 28(5), 1212-1223.
Vanrooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 71-95.
Vehbi, C., & Mehmet, K. (2012). Emotional intelligence and affect based job outcomes: A multilevel study on school administrators and teachers. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1673-1688.
Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243-274.
Wong, C. S., Wong, P. M., & Peng, K. Z. (2010). Effect of middle-level leader and teacher emotional intelligence on school teachers' job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(1), 59-70.
Yanchus, N.J., Eby, L. T., Lance, C. E., & Drollinger, S. (2010). The impact of emotional labor on work-family outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 5, 105-107.
陈猛, 卞冉, 王丽娜, 车宏生, 林绚晖. (2012). 情绪智力与工作绩效的关系. 心理科学进展, 20(3), 412-423.
丁弈. (2007). 组织社会化视角下的新员工主动行为研究. 中国人力资源开发, 8, 10-12, 39.
李成江, 杨东涛. (2011). 员工授权知觉与主动行为关系研究:独立型伦理氛围的中介作用. 软科学, 25(4), 91-95.
李志勇, 吴明证, 张爱群. (2011). 心理资本与工作满意度、生活满意度的关系:工作家庭促进的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(6), 818-820.
刘衍玲. (2007). 中小学教师情绪工作的探索性研究. 西南大学博士论文.
罗耀平, 范会勇, 张进辅. (2007). 工作-家庭冲突的前因、后果及干预策略. 心理科学进展, 15(6), 930-937.
潘孝富, 谭小宏, 秦启文, 王蕾. (2010). 教师组织公平感与组织公民行为:工作绩效的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 4, 409-444.
申传刚, 马红宇, 杨璟, 刘腾飞. (2012). 上司不当督导与下属绩效:反馈寻求行为和学习目标定向的作用. 心理学报, 44(12), 1677-1686.
唐汉瑛, 马红宇, 王斌. (2007). 工作—家庭界面研究的新视角:工作家庭促进研究. 心理科学进展, 15(5), 852-858.
王晶, 吴明霞, 廖礼慧, 吴梅宝. (2010). 国外工作—家庭平衡研究的现状述评. 心理科学进展, 8(8), 1269-1276.
王永丽, 张智宇, 何颖. (2012). 工作—家庭支持对员工创造力的影响探讨. 心理学报, 44(12), 1651-1662.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. (2004). 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, 36(2), 186-194.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘云红. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
吴维库, 关鑫, 胡伟科. (2011). 领导情绪智力水平与领导绩效关系的实证研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 32(8), 173-179.
肖丽君. (2012). 幼儿教师情绪劳动、情绪智力与工作绩效的关系研究. 湖南师范大学硕士论文, 2012.
胥兴春. (2007). 教师工作价值观及其影响效应研究. 西南大学博士论文.
张大均, 江琦. (2005). 教师心理素质与专业性发展. 北京:人民教育出版社.
张桂平, 廖建桥. (2011). 国外员工主动行为研究新进展探析. 外国经济与管理, 33(3), 58-65.
张辉华, 王辉. (2011). 个体情绪智力与工作场所绩效关系的元分析. 心理学报, 43(2), 188-202.
张莉, 林与川, 于超跃, 刘凤江. (2012). 支持资源作用下的工作—家庭促进:情感倾向的调节作用. 管理学报, 9(3), 388-395.
张小雪. (2012). 初中教师情绪智力、职业倦怠与工作绩效的关系研究. 内蒙古师范大学硕士论文.
[1] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[2] 姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849.
[3] 杨振芳. 工作支持对乡村教师工作激情的影响:基本心理需要满足的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 850-858.
[4] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[5] 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.
[6] 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[7] 李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[8] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[9] 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[10] 吴甲旺, 李红霞, 司继伟. 小学低年级儿童的计算流畅性与数学焦虑:基于变量为中心与个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 72-80.
[11] 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[12] 贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.
[13] 董及美, 周晨, 侯亚楠, 赵蕾, 魏淑华. 留守初中生同伴侵害与攻击性的关系:链式多重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 615-623.
[14] 汪海彬, 张鹏程, 卢家楣, 瞿琼, 张燕. 职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 462-468.
[15] 何安明, 包灿灿, 惠秋平. 大学生情绪智力与心理健康的关系:社会支持的中介作用和手机依赖的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 494-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!