心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 400-406,423.

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

日常烦恼与农村留守儿童的偏差行为:亲子亲合的作用

赵景欣1, 刘霞2, 李悦3   

  1. 1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250014;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理学研究所, 北京 100875;
    3. 华南师范大学教育科学学院, 心理系, 广州 510631
  • 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘霞,E-mail: liuxia@bnu.edu.cn; 赵景欣, E-mail: jingxinzhao@126.com E-mail:liuxia@bnu.edu.cn;jingxinzhao@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    山东省高校人文社科研究计划项目(项目号:J11WH10);山东省“十二五”特色重点学科(发展与教育心理学)经费资助;教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(项目号:04JZD0026).

Daily Hassles and Rural Left-behind Children’s Delinquent Behavior:The Role of Parental Cohesion

ZHAO Jing-xin1, LIU Xia2, LI Yue3   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Department of Psychology, School of Educational Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 以来自河南省农村的207名农村留守儿童为被试,主要探讨流动养育者、留守养育者与儿童间的亲合水平在降低儿童偏差行为上的直接作用及其对日常烦恼与偏差行为之间关系的调节作用。结果表明:(1)儿童经历的日常烦恼越多,其偏差行为越高;流动养育者、留守养育者与儿童的亲合水平越高,农村留守儿童的偏差行为越低。(2)流动养育者-儿童亲合能够显著调节日常烦恼与儿童偏差行为之间的关系,表现出了压力抵抗效应:在低亲合条件下,日常烦恼与偏差行为之间存在显著正相关;在高亲合条件下,二者之间的关联不再显著。(3)留守养育者-儿童亲合能够显著调节日常烦恼与偏差行为之间的关系,在单亲外出儿童群体中表现出了保护稳定性,在双亲外出儿童群体中表现出了保护的扩大化。这表明,养育者与儿童之间的紧密情感联系是降低农村留守儿童偏差行为的重要保护因素。

关键词: 农村留守儿童, 留守养育者, 流动养育者, 亲子亲合, 偏差行为

Abstract: A total of 207 rural Left-behind children were recruited from a rural area in Henan province of China, including 90 children from two-parent-migrant families and 117 children from father migrant families. These children completed a self-report assessment on testing the exacerbation effects of daily hassles on children's delinquent behavior, and the protective effects of migrant parental cohesion and Left-behind caregiver-child cohesion on reducing their delinquent behavior. Results indicated that daily hassles were positive associated with children's delinquent behavior, and high quality of migrant parental cohesion or Left-behind caregiver-child cohesion predicted low level of children's delinquent behavior. Meanwhile, migrant parental cohesion could buffer the deleterious effects of daily hassles to Left-home-children's delinquent behavior. Additionally, the protective effect of Left-behind caregiver-child cohesion on delinquent behavior changed as a function of children's group. The protective-enhancing effect of Left-behind caregiver-child cohesion was found for children from two-parent-migrant families, while the protective-stabilizing effect existed among the children from father migrant families. These findings highlight the importance of high quality of parent-child cohesion for Left-behind children's positive development.

Key words: Left-behind-children, migrant caregiver, Left-behind-caregiver, parental cohesion, delinquent behavior

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1

Achenbach, T. M. , & Edelbrock, C. (1987). Manual for the adolescents' self-report and profile. Burlington, VT, Department of psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Aiken, L. S. , & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., & Olsen, J. A. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control, assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 70(4), 1-137.
Bean, R. A., Barber B. K., & Crane, D. R. (2006). Parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control among African American youth: the relationships to academic grades, Delinquency, and depression. Journal of family issues, 27(10), 1335-1355.
Fan, F., Su, L., & Gill, M. K.(2010). Emotional and behavioral problems of Chinese left-behind children: a preliminary study. Social psychiatry epidemiology, 45, 655-664.
Formoso, D., Gonzales, N. A., & Aiken, L. S. (2000). Family conflict and children's internalizing and externalizing behavior: protective factors. American journal of community psychology, 28(2), 175-199.
Fuligni, A. J. (1998). Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion: a study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipno, and European backgrounds. Developmental psychology, 34(4), 782-792.
Kerr, D. C. R., Capaldi, D. M., Pears, K. C., & Owen, L. D.(2009). A prospective three generational study of fathers' constructive parenting: influences from family of origin, adolescent adjustment, and offspring temperament. Developmental psychology, 45(5), 1257-1275.
Kuntsche, E. N., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2004). Parental closeness and adolescent substance use in single and two-parent families in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63(2), 85-92.
Lamborn, S. D., & Felbab, A.J. (2003). Applying ethnic equivalence and cultural values models to African-American teens' perceptions of parents. Journal of Adolescence, 26(5), 601-618.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience, a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development, 71(3), 543-562.
Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family process, 18(1), 3-28.
Parke, R. D., & Buriel, R. (2006). Socialization in the family: ethnic and ecological perspectives. Handbook of Child Psychology(6th ed., pp. 429-504). New York: Wiley.
Shek, D. T. L. (2003). Economic stress, psychological well-being and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with economic disadvantage. Journal of youth and adolescence, 32(4), 259-266.
Steinberg, L. (1988). Reciprocal relation between parent-child distance and pubertal maturation. Developmental psychology, 24(1), 122-128.
Steinberg, L. (2007). Adolescence (8th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Vieno A., Nation, M., Pastore, M., & Santinello, M. (2009). Parenting and antisocial behavior: a model of the relationship between adolescent self-disclosure, parental closeness, parental control, and adolescent antisocial behavior. Developmental psychology, 45(6), 1509-1519.
Wen, M. , & Lin, D. (2012). Child development in rural China: children left behind by their migrant parents and children of nonmigrant families. Child Development, 83(1), 120-136.
Windle, M.(1992). A longitudinal study of stress buffering for adolescent problem behaviors. Developmental psychology, 28(3), 522-530.
Zhang, W. X. , & Fuligni, A. J. (2006). Authority, autonomy, and family relationships among adolescents in urban and rural China. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(4), 527-537.
池瑾, 胡心怡, 申继亮. (2008). 不同留守类型农村儿童的情绪特征比较. 教育科学研究, 8/9, 54-57.
范方, 桑标. (2005). 亲子教育缺失与“留守儿童”人格、学绩及行为问题. 心理科学, 28(4), 855-858.
范兴华, 方晓义. (2010). 不同监护类型留守儿童与一般儿童问题行为比较. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 232-237.
辜胜阻, 易善策, 李华. (2011). 城镇化进程中农村留守儿童问题及对策. 教育研究, (9), 29-33.
胡滨. (2010). 农村留守儿童犯罪的实证研究. 青少年犯罪问题, (1), 56-59.
黄艳苹. (2006). 家庭教养方式对农村留守儿童心理健康的影响. 江西师范大学硕士论文.
李庆丰. (2002). 农村劳动力外出务工对“留守子女”发展的影响. 上海教育科研, 22(9), 25-28.
师保国,申继亮.(2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34.
张文新.(1999). 儿童社会性发展. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
赵景欣. (2007). 压力背景下留守儿童心理发展的保护因素与抑郁、反社会行为的关系. 北京师范大学博士论文.
赵景欣, 刘霞. (2010). 农村留守儿童的抑郁和偏差行为: 日常积极事件的保护作用. 心理发展与教育, (6), 634-640.
赵景欣, 王焕红, 王世凤. (2010). 压力性生活事件与农村留守儿童的抑郁/反社会行为的关系. 青少年研究,1-6
周宗奎, 孙晓军, 刘亚, 周东明. (2005). 农村留守儿童心理发展与教育问题. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 71-79.
[1] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[2] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[3] 范志宇, 吴岩. 亲子关系与农村留守儿童孤独感、抑郁:感恩的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 734-742.
[4] 王辰, 陈刚, 刘跃宁, 牛更枫, 殷华敏. 社会排斥对网络偏差行为的影响:自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 208-215.
[5] 张永欣, 周宗奎, 丁倩, 魏华. 班级同学关系与青少年外化问题行为:自尊和亲子亲合的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 732-741.
[6] 胡义秋, 方晓义, 刘双金, 朱翠英, 孙焕良, 范兴华. 农村留守儿童焦虑情绪的异质性:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 346-352.
[7] 赵景欣, 栾斐斐, 孙萍, 徐婷婷, 刘霞. 亲子亲合、逆境信念与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 441-448.
[8] 赵景欣, 王秋金, 杨萍, 刘霞. 行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系:留守与非留守青少年的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 352-360.
[9] 赵景欣, 杨萍, 马金玲, 黄翠翠. 歧视知觉与农村留守儿童积极/消极情绪的关系:亲子亲合的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 369-376.
[10] 杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 311-318.
[11] 赵景欣, 刘霞. 农村留守儿童的抑郁和反社会行为:日常积极事件的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 634-640.
[12] 王成全, 赵希斌, 王昌海, 张红川, 董奇. 学校危险和保护因素与初中生偏差行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 33-38.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!