心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 333-341.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.03.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究

郑显亮1, 陈慧萍1, 王雪2, 鲍振宙1   

  1. 1. 赣南师范大学教育科学学院, 赣州 341000;
    2. 江西环境工程职业学院汽车机电学院, 赣州 341000
  • 发布日期:2023-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 王雪 E-mail:675920805@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31760286)。

Development Trends of Adolescents’ Internet Altruistic Behavior and the Influence of Social Class: A Longitudinal Study

ZHENG Xianliang1, CHEN Huiping1, WANG Xue2, BAO Zhenzhou1   

  1. 1. Educational Science School, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000;
    2. Automotive Mechatronics School, Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College, Ganzhou 341000
  • Published:2023-05-13

摘要: 采用追踪研究设计对832名12~20岁的青少年进行为期1年半共4次的追踪测查,考察青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势以及社会阶层与青少年网络利他行为发展趋势的关系。运用多层线性模型对数据进行分析,结果表明:(1)青少年网络利他行为呈逐渐上升趋势;(2)性别、每周上网时间和客观社会阶层对青少年网络利他行为发展趋势的影响不显著,而主观社会阶层对青少年网络利他行为发展趋势的影响显著,即青少年的主观社会阶层越高,其网络利他行为的上升趋势越强。

关键词: 网络利他行为, 主观社会阶层, 客观社会阶层, 追踪研究, 青少年

Abstract: A one-and-a-half-year longitudinal study (4 tests in total) was conducted to explore the development trend of Internet altruistic behavior (IAB) among adolescents and the relationship between social class and the developmental trends of adolescents’ IAB. A total of 832 participates aged 12~20 years completed all questionnaires. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) results showed that: (1) The adolescents’ IAB showed an increasing trend over time; (2) Gender, weekly online time and objective social class had no significant influence on the development trend of the adolescents’ IAB, while subjective social class had significant influence on the development trend of adolescents’ IAB. That is, the higher the adolescents’ subjective social class, the stronger the upward trend of their IAB.

Key words: internet altruistic behavior, subjective social class, objective social class, longitudinal study, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Furnham, A. (2007). The positive net.Computers in Human Behavior,23(2), 1033-1045.
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation:Is it ever truly altruistic?Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 65-22.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development:Research perspectives.Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2020). With a little help from their peers:The impact of classmates on adolescents' development of prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), 1849-1863.
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301-324.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ. Eribaum.
Decety, J., & Svetlova, M. (2012). Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy.Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 1-24.
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006).The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701-778). New Jersey:Wiley.
Green, F. P., & Schneider, F. W. (1974). Age differences in the behavior of boys on three measures of altruism. Child Development, 45, 248-251.
Hanson, M. D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence:A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 263-285.
Jacobs, J. E., Vernon, M. K., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Relations between social self-perceptions, time use, and prosocial or problem behaviors during adolescence.Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 45-62.
James, R. N., & Sharpe, D. L. (2007). The nature and causes of the U-shaped charitable giving profile.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 218-238.
Jiang, H., Chen, G., & Wang, T. (2017). Relationship between belief in a just world and Internet altruistic behavior in a sample of Chinese undergraduates:Multiple mediating roles of gratitude and self-esteem.Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 493-498.
Kraus, M., & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior:The moderating role of public versus private contexts.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 769-777.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism:How the rich are different from the poor.Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
Kumru, A. (2002). Prosocial behavior within the family context and its correlates among Turkish early adolescents (Paper AAI3074086). Lincoln:University of Nebraska.
Nicolas, G. (2008). Helping on the web:Ethnic stereotypes and computer-mediated communication. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 1-3.
Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity:The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835-850.
Shen, C. X., Liu, R. D., & Wang, D. (2013). Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life.Computers in Human Behavior, 29,185-192.
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage:How American universities' focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178-1197.
Zheng, X., Xie, F., & Ding, L. (2018). Mediatingrole of self-concordance on the relationship between Internet altruistic behaviour and subjective well-being. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12(e1), 1-8.
丁子恩, 刘勤学.(2020). 大学生网络交往与网络利他行为的关系:自尊与公我意识的作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 175-183.
费尔德曼. (2007). 发展心理学:人的毕生发展(第6版)(苏彦捷 译).世界图书出版社.
黄少华. (2008). 网络空间的社会行为:青少年网络行为研究. 北京:人民出版社.
胡小勇, 李静, 芦学璋, 郭永玉. (2014). 社会阶层的心理学研究:社会认知视角. 心理科学, 37(6), 1509-1517.
金剑, 李晔, 陈冬明, 郭凯娇. (2017). 权力和地位对自利行为的影响及其机制. 心理科学进展, 25(5), 878-886.
刘红云, 张雷. (2005). 纵向数据分析方法及应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.
刘勤学, 陈武, 周宗奎. (2015). 大学生网络使用与网络利他行为:网络使用自我效能和性别的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 685-693.
刘儒德, 沈彩霞, 徐乐, 高钦. (2014). 儿童基本心理需要满足对上网行为和上网情感的影响:一项追踪研究.心理发展与教育, 30(1), 90-95
陆学艺. (2002). 当代中国社会阶层研究报告. 北京:社会科学文献出版社.
彭庆红, 樊富珉. (2005). 青少年网络利他行为及其对高校德育的启示. 思想理论教育导刊, (12), 49-51.
韦庆旺, 李木子, 陈晓晨. (2018). 社会阶层与社会知觉:热情和能力哪个更重要? 心理学报, 50(2), 243-252.
解晓娜, 李小平. (2018). 主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响. 心理与行为研究,16(4), 563-569.
张瀚月. (2015). 性别和情绪对助人行为的影响. 心理学进展, 5(12), 868-872.
赵倩.(2019).特质移情与大学生网络利他行为:道德认同的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(4), 800-802.
郑显亮. (2013). 网络利他行为的理论与实证研究. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.
郑显亮, 王亚芹.(2017).青少年网络利他行为与主观幸福感的关系——一个有中介的调节模型. 心理科学, 40(1), 70-75.
郑显亮,谢方威,丁亮, 王雪.(2021). 社会阶层与大学生网络利他行为:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 37(2),182-189.
郑显亮, 赵薇.(2015b).共情、自我效能感与网络利他行为的关系.中国临床心理学杂志, 23(2), 358-361.
郑显亮, 赵薇.(2015a).中学生网络利他行为与希望的关系:自我效能感与自尊的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 31(4), 428-436.
郑显亮, 祝春兰, 顾海根. (2011). 青少年网络利他行为量表的编制.中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 606-608.
[1] 郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5] 王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响:自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[6] 李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[7] 向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[8] 边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[9] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[10] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[11] 王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[12] 陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[13] 汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[14] 张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.
[15] 彭大炬, 程诚, 郭培杨, 许洋. 青少年冷酷无情特质和边缘人格特质的共同风险因素模型:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 528-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!