高中生的亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.02.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨高中生亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响，实验一采用亲子沟通量表，筛选出亲子沟通高分组和低分组，两组被试参加点探测任务，要求被试迅速判断情绪性图片出现后呈现的圆点的位置。实验为2（组别：高亲子沟通组、低亲子沟通组）×2（情绪类型：负性和正性）×2（探测点位置一致性：一致、不一致）的混合实验设计。结果发现，负性和正性刺激的不一致条件反应时均显著短于一致条件的反应时。实验二采用事件相关电位（ERP）记录了情绪性图片诱发的信号反应。结果发现，亲子沟通高分组对负性刺激所诱发的注意指向和集中（P2成分）及选择和巩固（P3成分）显著高于低分组。以上结果表明，亲子沟通较好，在注意早期定向和选择中会对负性情绪刺激产生注意偏向。亲子沟通较差，则对情绪性的刺激没有明显的偏向性，类似于“漠不关心”的状态。

关键词: 亲子沟通, 情绪性图片, 注意偏向, P2成分, P3成分

Abstract: In order to explore the effects of the quality of parent-child communication in high school students on the attention bias in the processing of affactive stimuli, firstly, the parent-child communication questionnaire was used to select the high group and the low group of parent-child communication. Both groups participated in a behavioral experiment task by employing the dot-probe paradigm (Experiment 1). Participants were instructed to response for the position of a dot followed a probe. The experiment employed a 2×2 within-subject design, with the affective picture pairs of the probe (negative, positive), and the validity of the probe and dot position (valid, invalid). The experiment simultaneously recorded behavioral data and event-related potential data. The data of Experiment 1 showed a significant effect of inhibition return, which terms that the reaction times in invalid condition were faster than that in valid condition. Experiment 2 used event-ralated potential (ERP) technology to investigate the neural mechanism underlying the attentional bias to affective stimuli. Data of Experiment 2 showed that the high group of family communication triggered a larger amplitude of P2 and P3 components than the low group of family communication, suggesting an attentional bias to the aggressive stimuli. Behavioral and ERP data suggested that the students with better family communication could pay more attention to aggressive stimuli in the early stage of orientation selection. Students with poor family communication were not found to have the attentional bias toward the affective stimuli, leading to a state of ‘indifferent care’.

Key words: parent-child communication, affective picture, attention bias, P2 component, P3 component

中图分类号:

B844

吴捷, 魏芙蓉, 李佳琪, 吴瑕. 高中生的亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 159-166.

WU Jie, WEI Furong, LI Jiaqi, WU Xia. The Effects of Parent-child Communication of High School Students on the Attention Bias of Affactive Stimuli[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 159-166.

参考文献

Allen, B. P., & Potkay, C. R. (1981). On the arbitrary distinction between states and traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 916-928.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development,56(2), 438-447.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression:Its causes, consequences, and control. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., & Glickman, S. (2005). Attentional bias in anxiety:A behavioral and ERP study. Brain & Cognition,59(1), 0-22.
Carretié L, Mercado F, Tapia M, & Hinojosa JA. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41(1), 75-85.
Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in the anxiety disorders:An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 0-216.
Clark, R. D., & Shields, G. (1997). Family communication and delinquency.Adolescence, 32(125), 81-92.
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB:An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods,134(1), 9-21.
Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., Sears, R. W., & Faris, E. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. American Journal of Sociology, 92(7), 1654-1667.
Dyck, M., Habel, U. J., Schlummer, J., Backes, V., Schneider, F., & Reske, M. (2009). Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(5), 855-864.
Eckhardt, C. I., & Cohen, D. J. (1997). Attention to anger-relevant and irrelevant stimuli following naturalistic insult. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(4), 619-629.
Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders:Onset, developmental course, and termination-The American Society of Criminology 1993 presidential address. Criminology, 32(1), 1-21.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030-1044.
Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat:Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion,16(3), 355-379.
Hartos, J. L., & Power, T. G. (2000). Relations among single mothers' awareness of their adolescents' stressors, maternal monitoring, mother-adolescent communication, and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(5), 546-563.
Hajcak, G., Macnamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010). Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation:An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 129-155.
Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2006). Temporal course of emotional negativity bias:An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 398(1), 91-96.
Ilan, A. B., & Polich, J. (1999). P300 and response time from a manual stroop task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(2), 367-373.
Kanske, P., Plitschka, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Attentional orienting towards emotion:P2 and N400 ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 49(11), 3121-3129.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 0-848.
Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect:A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333-49.
Nikendei, C., Dengler, W., Wiedemann, G., & Pauli, P. (2005). Selective processing of pain-related word stimuli in subclinical depression as indicated by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 70(1), 52-60.
Nandrino, J. L., Dodin, V., Martin, P., & Henniaux, M. (2004). Emotional information processing in first and recurrent major depressive episodes. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 38(5), 475-484.
Ostrov, M. C. M. (2009). A longitudinal study of forms and functions of aggressive behavior in early childhood. Child Development, 80(3), 828-842.
Ollendick,T. H., & Benoit, K. E. (2012). A Parent-Child Interactional Model of Social Anxiety Disorder in Youth. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review,15(1),81-91.
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300:An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128-2148.
Posner, M. L, & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X:Control of Language Processes, 32, 531-556.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25-42.
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality & Social Psychology Review,5(4), 296-320.
Puls, S., & Rothermund, K. (2018). Attending to emotional expressions:No evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 450-463.
Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2003). Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychological Science, 14(1), 7-13.
Schupp, H. T., Ohman, A., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces:An ERP analysis. Emotion, 4(2), 189-200.
Schapkin, S. A., Gusev, A. N., & Kuhl, J. (2000). Categorization of unilaterally presented emotional words:An ERP analysis. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 60(1), 17-28.
Todd, J., van Ryckeghem, D. M., Sharpe, L., & Crombez, G. (2018). Attentional bias to pain-related information:A meta-analysis of dot-probe studies. Health Psychology Review, 12(4), 419-436.
Torrence, R. D., & Troup, L. J. (2018). Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task:A systematic review. Psychophysiology, 55(6), e13051.
Williams, L. R., Degnan, K. A., Perez-Edgar, K. E., Henderson, H. A., Rubin, K. H., Pine, D. S.…Fox, N.A. (2009). Impact of behavioral inhibition and parenting style on internalizing and externalizing problems from early childhood through adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(8), 1063-1075.
雷雳, 王争艳, 刘红云, 张雷. (2002). 初中生的亲子沟通及其与家庭环境系统和社会适应关系的研究. 应用心理学, 8(1), 14-20.
杨小冬, 罗跃嘉. (2004). 注意受情绪信息影响的实验范式. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 833-841.

相关文章 15

[1]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[2]	张妍, 王峥, 罗娜, 王小莹, 李晓南. 失恋经历对爱情相关刺激注意偏向的影响:趋近还是回避？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 12-20.
[3]	刘春晖, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 母亲男孩偏好和亲子沟通的关系:子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[4]	刘文, 王依宁, 张嘉琪, 车翰博. 9~11岁儿童创造性人格与欺骗行为的关系:亲子沟通质量的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 508-516.
[5]	汪海彬, 张鹏程, 卢家楣, 瞿琼, 张燕. 职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 462-468.
[6]	牛更枫, 李占星, 王辰宵, 马晓彤, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 网络亲子沟通对留守初中生社会适应的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 678-685.
[7]	刘希平, 王贝妮, 唐卫海. 阈下情绪面孔的注视线索提示效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 129-137.
[8]	柴唤友, 陈春宇, 段长英, 朱彩凤, 孙晓军. 网络亲子沟通与青少年抑郁的关系:线上社会资本的中介作用及其年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 112-120.
[9]	雷玉菊, 贺金波, 牛更枫, 周宗奎, 田媛. 网络成瘾倾向者对负性表情注意的脱离困难[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 691-699.
[10]	李海江, 卢家楣, 张庆林, 邱江. 阈下抑郁个体对负性情绪刺激的注意解脱困难[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 513-520.
[11]	张林, 刘燊, 谢文澜, 李文涛. 成年期残疾个体对不同类型社交线索的注意偏向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 676-684.
[12]	邓林园, 武永新, 孔荣, 方晓义. 冲动性人格、亲子沟通对青少年网络成瘾的交互作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 169-176.
[13]	郭海英, 朱婉灵, 朱倩, 朱茂玲, 左培颖, 林丹华. 亲子沟通与农村青少年幸福感的关系：基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 129-136.
[14]	李海江, 贾磊, 罗俊龙, 杨娟, 张庆林, 李冰冰. 低自尊个体注意偏向的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 2-9.
[15]	王海涛, 黄珊珊, 黄月胜, 孙孝游, 郑希付. PTSD青少年对威胁图片注意偏向的时程特点及习惯化倾向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 255-262.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed