初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷法和追踪研究设计，对北京市294名初一学生进行了连续三年的追踪测查，来考察初中生学生投入的发展特点，以及同伴欺负与学生投入发展变化的关系。运用多层线性模型进行数据分析，结果表明：（1）从初一（T1）到初三（T3），学生的行为投入呈下降趋势（主要集中在参与学校活动的投入度上），情感投入和认知投入呈上升趋势；（2）在控制性别和父母学历后，初中生受言语欺负会负向预测T1时的行为和情感投入；受关系欺负会负向预测T1时的行为、情感及认知投入；受身体欺负会负向预测行为投入的下降速度。

关键词: 学生投入, 同伴欺负, 初中生, 追踪研究

Abstract: A three-year longitudinal study (from 2014 to 2016) was conducted to understand the development characteristics of middle school students' engagement and the associations between students' engagement and their perceived peer victimization in China. 294 participates completed all questionnaires, 142 (48.3%) were girls and 152 (51.7%) were boys. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) results showed that:(1) Middle school students' behavioral engagement significantly declined from the 7th to the 9th grades (mostly in the engagement of school activities); emotional engagement and cognitive engagement significantly increased over time; (2) In the first year of middle school, verbal victimization negatively predicted student's behavioral and emotional engagement; relational victimization negatively predicted to student's behavioral, emotional and cognitive engagement. In addition, physical victimization negatively predicted the developmental change of behavioral engagement across three years, which means that a student's behavioral engagement would decrease faster when he/she had higher level of physical victimization.

Key words: student engagement, peer victimization, middle school student, longitudinal study

中图分类号:

B844

郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.

ZHENG Qiao, GENG Lina, LUO Fang, LI Lingyan. Development Trajectories of Student Engagement among Middle School Students: Associations with Peer Victimization[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.

参考文献

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement:validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal Of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school:relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408-415.
Archambault, I., Kurdi, V., Olivier, E., & Goulet, M. (2016). The joint effect of peer victimization and conflict with teachers on student engagement at the end of elementary school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 62(2), 207-232.
Austin, S., & Joseph, S. (1996). Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 447-456.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 1. Theory (5th ed., pp. 993-1028). New York:Wiley.
Bouchard, K. L., & Smith, J. D. (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and children's bullying experiences with peers:reflecting on the mesosystem. The Educational Forum, 81(1), 108-125.
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 74-103). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization:processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 1-13.
Burch, G. F., Burch, J. J., & Womble, J. (2017). Student engagement:an empirical analysis of the effects of implementing mandatory web-based learning systems. Organization Management Journal, 14(2), 1-10.
Chase, P. A., Hilliard, L. J., Geldhof, G. J., Warren, D. J., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Academic achievement in the high school years:the changing role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(6), 884-896.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1099-1120). Washington, DC:National Association of School Psychologists.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York:Springer.
Cohan, S. L., Jang, K. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of a short form of the coping inventory for stressful situations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 273-283.
Darr, C. W. (2012). Measuring student engagement:The development of a scale for formative use. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 707-723). New York:Springer.
Dorio, N. B., Fredrick, S. S., & Demaray, M. K. (2018). School engagement and the role of peer victimization, depressive symptoms, and rumination. Retrieved August 27, 2018, from https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618797007
Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125-153). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence:the impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R.W. (2013). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In Laurence Steinberg & Richard M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd^e d., pp. 404-434). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Claes, S., et al. (2017). School engagement trajectories in adolescence:the role of peer likeability and popularity. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 61-75.
Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249-268.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.) What do children need to flourish?:Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305-321). New York:Springer Science and Business Media.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence:a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13.
Gumora, G., & Arsenio, W. F. (2002). Emotionality, emotional regulation, and school performance in middle school children. Journal of School Psychology, 40(5), 395-413.
Gutman, L. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence:yrajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 522-537.
Jia, Y., Konold, T. R., Cornell, D., & Huang, F. (2016). The impact of validity screening on associations between self-reports of bullying victimization and student outcomes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(1), 80-102.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr, G. H. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement:the role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318-340.
Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school:differential pathways for children's school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6),826-841.
Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., et al. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school:the results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213-232.
Li, Y. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence:implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233-247.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity:patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
Mehta, S. B., Cornell, D., Fan, X., & Gregory, A. (2013). Bullying climate and school engagement in ninth-grade students. Journal of School Health, 83(1), 45-52.
Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., Genta, M. L., Giannetti, E., Fonzi, A., & Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children's attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior:Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 23(4), 245-257.
Olweus, D., Limber, S., & Mihalic, S. F. (Eds). (1999). Blueprints for violence prevention, book nine:bullying prevention program. Boulde, CO:Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (Eds). (2005). How college affects students:Volume 2, a third decade of research. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
Ripski, M. B., & Gregory, A. (2009). Unfair, unsafe, and unwelcome:do high school students' perceptions of unfairness, hostility, and victimization in school predict engagement and achievement? Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 355-375.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire:a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Totura, C. M. W., Karver, M. S., & Gesten, E. L. (2014). Psychological distress and student engagement as mediators of the relationship between peer victimization and achievement in middle school youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 40-52.
Virtanen, T. E., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Kuorelahti, M. (2016). Assessment of student engagement among junior high school students and associations with self-esteem, burnout, and academic achievement. Journal for Educational Research Onlin, 8(2), 136-157.
Wang, M. T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development:findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57-65.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012a). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012b). Social support matters:longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895.
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722-737.
Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement:examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 465-480.
Watson, R. J., & Christensen, J. L. (2017). Big data and student engagement among vulnerable youth:a review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 23-27.
Wylie, C., & Hodgen, E. (2012). Trajectories and patterns of student engagement:evidence from a longitudinal study. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 585-599). New York:Springer.
陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇. (2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入:家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响.心理发展与教育, 31(2), 180-187.
谷传华, 张文新. (2003). 小学儿童欺负与人格倾向的关系.心理学报, 35(1), 101-105.
李海垒, 张文新, 于凤杰. (2012). 青少年受欺负与抑郁的关系.心理发展与教育, 28(1), 77-82.
刘在花. (2015). 中学生学习投入发展的现状与特点研究.中国特殊教育, (6), 71-77.
庞海波. (2009). 初中生学校归属感与心理健康的相关研究.心理科学, 32(5), 1238-1241.
田丽丽. (2007). 青少年学校满意度发展特点及其对学校归属感的预测.心理学探新, 27(4), 48-53.
王绯烨,刘方. (2018). 从课外时间分配看学生学业负担——我国初中学生学业负担的实证研究.教育发展研究, (10), 32-38.
王鉴. (2015). 中学生学习投入的个人和班级影响因素.中国健康心理学杂志, 23(12), 1836-1839.
谢家树, 谢璐, Yang, C., Bear, G. G., 凌宇. (2016). 中美青少年校园欺负受害问题的比较研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(4), 706-709.
张彩, 柯李, 张兴慧, 陈福美. (2016). 家庭社会经济地位处境不利初中生校园受欺负潜在类别及其与情绪适应的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 30(9), 694-699.
张可. (2004). 中小学教师对学校欺负行为的认知及其应对研究(硕士毕业论文). 河北大学, 保定.
张文新, 谷传华, 鞠玉翠. (2001). 儿童欺负问题与人格关系的研究述评.心理学动态, 9(3), 215-220.
张文新, 谷传华, 王美萍, 王益文, Jones, K. (2000). 中小学生欺负问题中的性别差异的研究.心理科学, 23(4), 435-511.
张文新, 武建芬, Jones, K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订.心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11.
张玉青,郭成. (2018). 中学生学校适应潜在类别及其生活满意度比较.中国学校卫生, 39(6), 890-893.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	李书琴, 向燕辉. 初中生宽恕的发展趋势与异质轨迹:大五人格的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 502-511.
[2]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[3]	黎钰林, 吴德华, 卿亿承, 李丹, 尹华站. 童年期虐待对初中生主观幸福感的影响：同伴依恋的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 254-263.
[4]	李蓓蕾, 林彤, 赖梅艳, 车猛, 邓林园. 初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系：基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.
[5]	张明浩, 王俊儒, 王艳, 杨照黎, 张艳芳, 娄慧琳, 徐晓惠, 徐敏. 生命早期环境不可预测性对初中生抑郁的影响:生命史策略和资源控制策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 881-891.
[6]	聂倩, 张大均, 滕召军, 李辞, 孟冉, 范骏, 郭成. “农村高中进城”学生感知的学校氛围和心理素质的变化及其关系:一年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 571-578.
[7]	刘采梦, 苑广哲, 丁絮, 冯康泓, 黄茗瑜, 林锦祺. 初中生焦虑症状对问题性手机使用的影响:错失恐惧与无法忍受不确定性的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 427-435.
[8]	刘畅, 伍新春, 邹盛奇. 父母协同教养与初中生学校适应:教养投入和亲子依恋的作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 226-234.
[9]	周姿言, 胡潇, 张一林, 苏瑞琳, 辛素飞, 盛靓. 负性生活事件与初中生网络成瘾的关系: 社交焦虑和无聊倾向的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 109-116.
[10]	王恩娜, 夏梦雅, 屈笛扬, 张俊杰, 梁凯欣, 肖嘉林, 迟新丽. 家庭功能发展轨迹类型对初中阶段青少年网络成瘾的影响:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 853-864.
[11]	向燕辉, 马丽平. 初中生认知与情感幸福感发展趋势及影响因素: 基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 645-657.
[12]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[13]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[14]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[15]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.