小学一年级阅读流畅性对二、三年级阅读理解的预测

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.03.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用追踪研究考察了124名小学一年级儿童的阅读流畅性对其二、三年级阅读理解的影响。结果发现，在控制了性别、家庭社会经济地位、推理能力、汉字识别、口语词汇及多种阅读相关认知技能之后，儿童一年级时的字词流畅性可以预期其二、三年级时的阅读理解水平，句子流畅性对二年级时阅读理解的变异有独特解释作用，但对三年级时阅读理解的变异没有显著的解释作用。相对于句子流畅性，字词流畅性在小学低年级阶段对阅读理解的贡献更大。

关键词: 阅读流畅性, 阅读理解, 汉语儿童, 追踪研究

Abstract: In the present study, we attempted to investigate reading fluency of first-graders and its long-term associations with reading comprehension of second and third-graders. One hundred and twenty-four children participated in the study. Regression analyses revealed that word reading fluency of first-graders could significantly predict reading comprehension of second-and third-graders after controlling for gender, family SES, IQ, vocabulary, character recognition, and the effects of reading-related skills. Besides, sentence reading fluency of Grade 1 could significantly predict reading comprehension of Grade 2, but not uniquely related with reading comprehensions of Grade 3. The contribution made by word reading fluency to reading comprehension is larger than the contribution made by sentence reading fluency. These results underscore the importance of word reading fluency for the development of children's reading comprehension.

Key words: reading fluency, reading comprehension, Chinese children, longitudinal study

程亚华, 伍新春. 小学一年级阅读流畅性对二、三年级阅读理解的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 314-321.

CHENG Yahua, WU Xinchun. Reading Fluency of First-graders Predicted Reading Comprehension of Second-and Third-graders[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(3): 314-321.

参考文献

Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Wu, X., Liu, H., Dong, Q., et al. (2017). Growth of compounding awareness predicts reading comprehension in Chinese students:A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 2. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 91-104.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade:Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 7-21.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence:A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.

Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction:What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.

Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency:A multidimensional view. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4-32.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.

Joshi, R. M., Tao, S., Aaron, P. G., & Quiroz, B. (2012). Cognitive component of componential model of reading applied to different orthographies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 480-486.

Kim, Y.-S. G. (2015). Developmental, component-based model of reading fluency:An investigation of predictors of word-reading fluency, text-reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459-481.

Kim, Y.-S., Park, C., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a "bridge" to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 27(1),128-144.

Kim, Y.-S. G., & Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development:An investigation of its mediating role for children from Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224-242.

Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension:A latent variable study of first grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338-362.

Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading:A handbook (pp. 209-226). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.

Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310-321.

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency:Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.

Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency:A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.

Lei, L., Pan, J., Liu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2011). Developmental trajectories of reading development and impairment from ages 3 to 8 years in Chinese children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(2), 212-220.

Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children's character recognition:Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 287-307.

Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.

Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading:A handbook (pp.227-247). Malden, MA:Blackwell.

PIRLS.(2006). 台湾报告. 取自 https://sites.google.com/site/reading8learning01/pirls/pirls-2006

Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D'Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167-201.

Seyomour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.

Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese:Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27-47.

Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia:Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122-133.

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.

李利平, 伍新春, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. (2016). 语素意识对小学生阅读流畅性的影响:汉字识别的中介作用. 心理科学, 39(6), 1398-1405.

孟祥芝, 沙淑颖, 周晓林. (2004). 语音意识、快速命名与中文阅读. 心理科学, 27(6), 1326-1329.

师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34.

温鸿博. (2005). 小学语文阅读能力测评量表的编制(硕士学位论文). 华南师范大学, 广州.

张婵, 盖笑松. (2013). 汉语阅读障碍儿童的阅读流畅性研究. 心理与行为研究, 11(3), 340-345.

张厚粲, 王晓平. (1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 21(2), 113-121.

张玉平, 董琼, 舒华, 吴燕. (2017). 语音意识、命名速度和语素意识在汉语阅读发展中的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 401-409.

周雪莲, 程亚华, 李宜逊, 韩春翔, 李虹. (2016). 朗读流畅性在儿童阅读发展中的预测作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 471-477.

相关文章 15

[1]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[2]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[3]	王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[5]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 吕潇潇, 张巧, 李海娇. 儿童理解监控的即时加工过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 592-599.
[6]	张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[7]	周婷娜, 李宜逊, 李虹, 徐钟庚, 张锋, 程亚华. 汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[8]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[9]	陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[10]	林文毅, 杨怡, 余圣陶. 知识验证信念对于多文本阅读理解的影响机制:阅读策略的中介效应和主题知识的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 708-714.
[11]	韩瑽瑽, 陈英和, 于晓, 邓之君, 刘静, 侯江文, 林燕燕. 表面相似性对数量关系和相对大小关系理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 257-264.
[12]	闫梦格, 李虹, 李宜逊, 周雪莲, 回懿, 程亚华, 伍新春. 识字量和词汇知识在儿童阅读发展中的相对重要性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 311-317.
[13]	郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.
[14]	程亚华, 周婷娜, 赵英, 李虹, 伍新春. 小学低年级儿童阅读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 686-696.
[15]	赵英, 伍新春, 陈红君. 汉语儿童语素意识对阅读理解的影响:默读流畅性的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 430-438.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed