心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 616-623.

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

书面字形在汉语低年级儿童口语词汇学习中的作用

陈钰1,2, 李虹1, 张洁3, 阮晓彤1,4, 饶夏溦1, 伍新春1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学院应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875;
    2. 宝鸡市虢镇中学, 陕西 721300;
    3. 美国西肯塔基大学教育学院, 美国 42104;
    4. 襄阳市第一中学, 湖北 441000
  • 出版日期:2014-11-15 发布日期:2014-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 李虹,E-mail:psy.lihong@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:psy.lihong@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社科项目(10YJCXLX020);国家基础科学人才培养基金(J1103601, J1210048).

The Role of Orthography in Oral Vocabulary Learning of Chinese Children

CHEN Yu1,2, LI Hong1, ZHANG Jie3, RUAN Xiao-tong1,4, RAO Xia-wei1, WU Xin-chun1   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Guozhen Middle School, Baoji 721300, Shaanxi Province;
    3. Western Kentucky University, U.S.A 42104;
    4. No.1 Middle School, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province
  • Online:2014-11-15 Published:2014-11-15

摘要: 采用配对联想学习范式, 通过2个实验, 系统考察了书面字形在汉语低年级儿童口语词汇学习中的作用。实验一以40名二年级学生为研究对象, 控制了假字的形旁透明度, 操纵了声旁的规则性, 要求儿童分别在规则字、不规则字和无字形条件下学习4个新异物体的名称, 结果发现呈现不规则汉字阻碍了儿童口语词汇的学习;实验二以27名一年级学生为研究对象, 采用相同的配对联想学习范式, 同时操纵了假字的声旁规则性和形旁透明度, 再次发现了不规则汉字的阻碍效应, 并且发现透明形旁对口语词汇学习的促进作用。整个研究表明, 书面字形在汉语儿童口语词汇学习中具有重要作用, 这对今后的教学实践和理论研究都具有重要启示意义。

关键词: 词汇学习, 汉字, 规则性, 透明度, 配对联想学习

Abstract: Learning new oral vocabulary involves a process of making links between a word's pronunciation (phonology) and its meaning (semantics). Research on alphabetic languages showed orthographic facilitation in children's vocabulary learning depending on their knowledge of grapheme-phoneme connections. However, no research has been conducted to investigate whether similar results might be observed in Chinese vocabulary learning and it is not intuitively obvious because Chinese correspondences between orthography and phonology are less transparent. Two experiments were conducted in the present study to address how orthography-phonology congruence and transparency of meaning influence Chinese vocabulary learning.
In Experiment 1, 40 second graders were taught to associate 12 spoken monosyllable labels with novel-object pictures over four learning trials. Children learned 4 of the monosyllable-picture pairs with regular opaque pseudo-characters which provided congruent phonetic information but no semantic information of the character, 4 monosyllables with irregular opaque pseudo-characters, and 4 monosyllables without any orthography. Three orthographic types were counterbalanced across monosyllables and pictures to form three sets. Children were randomly assigned to one of the three sets. The results showed poorer recall with incongruent characters than with no orthography or with congruent characters. In Experiment 2, 27 first graders were taught another 12 picture-monosyllable associations with regular pseudo-characters or irregular pseudo-characters or no orthography. Transparency of character is also manipulated. Half of items under each condition are transparent characters which provided useful semantic information of the whole character and the other half are opaque characters which provided misleading cues to the character's meaning. Results duplicated the orthographic interference of irregular condition in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the effect of transparency was indicated by better recall with transparent characters than with opaque characters.
These results revealed the role of Chinese orthography in oral vocabulary learning. Exposure to irregular orthography hindered memory of words. But transparent characters boosted children's memory of pronunciation-meaning associations. The current study extends orthography effect from alphabetic languages to Chinese, a non-alphabetic language where phonology is not readily inferred from orthography. The orthographic effect should be given full consideration in future Chinese vocabulary teaching.

Key words: vocabulary learning, Chinese character, regularity, transparency, paired-associated learning

中图分类号: 

  • G442

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Robust vocabulary instruction:Bringing words to life. New York:The Guilford Press.

Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, H., & Shu, H. (2006).Developmental Stages in Learning to Read Chinese. Unpublished Doctor Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.),Reading acquisition (pp. 107-143).

Ehri, L., & Rosenthal, J. (2007). Spellings of words:a neglected facilitators of vocabulary learning.Journal of Literary Research, 39(4), 389-409.

Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 26-40.

Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995).Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD:Brookes.

Hu, C. F. (2008). Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning:Who benefits?Reading and Writing,21(8), 823-841.

Muench, K. L., & Creel, S. C. (2013). Gradient phonological inconsistency affects vocabulary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advanced online. doi:10.1037/a0032862.

Nagy, W. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In Wagner, R.K., Muse, A.E., & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition:Implications for reading comprehension. New York:The Guilford Press.

Nagy, W., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. Mossenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.),Handbook of reading research (Vol.3,pp.269-284). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

Nelson, J. R., Balass, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2005). Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words.Written Language & Literacy,8(2), 25-44.

Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability:Lexical quality to comprehension.Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357-383.

Rastle, K., McCormick, S. F., Bayliss, L., & Davis, C. J. (2011). Orthography influences the perception and production of speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,37(6), 1588-1594. doi:10.1037/a0024833.

Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Nation, K. (2009). Orthographic facilitation in oral vocabulary acquisition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(10), 1948-1966.

Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(1), 175-191.

Rosenthal, J., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Pronouncing new words aloud during the silent reading of text enhances fifth graders' memory for vocabulary words and their spellings.Reading and Writing,24(8), 921-950.

Shu, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1996). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children.Reading Research Quarterly,32(1), 78-89.

Shu, H., Anderson, R. C., & Wu, N. (2000). Phonetic awareness:Knowledge of orthography-phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 56-62.

Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese:Implications for learning to read.Child Development, 74, 27-47.

Shu, H., & Zeng, H. M. (1996). Awareness of phonological cues in pronunciation in Chinese characters and its development.Acta Psychologica Sinica,28,160-165.

舒华, 曾红梅. (1996). 儿童对汉字结构中语音线索的意识及其发展.心理学报, 28, 160-165.
[1] 龙翼婷, 姜英杰, 缴润凯. 编码和提取水平对儿童绑定加工发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 761-767.
[2] 张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[3] 古婵媛, 毕鸿燕. 主观声旁家族对汉语儿童汉字命名的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 68-75.
[4] 刘宇飞, 钱怡, 宋耀武, 毕鸿燕. 4~6岁汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 65-72.
[5] 李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 698-705.
[6] 张振军, 丁国盛, 陈宝国. 汉字习得的年龄效应:语音完整性假设的检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 577-583.
[7] 王恩国, 沈徳立, 吕勇, 胡伟, 李永鑫, 陈海霞. 语文学习困难儿童汉字记忆编码的神经机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 164-173.
[8] 胡天婷, 陶沙, 徐琴美, 毕鸿燕. 不同汉字解码技能与小学生阅读理解的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 144-152.
[9] 谭华玉, 刘鸣. 表象对初中一年级学生成语理解影响的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 45-49.
[10] 王敬欣, 沈德立. 汉字的特性负启动效应与年龄发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 18(2): 9-13.
[11] 孙燕青, 董奇. 在多媒体语境条件下词类对儿童英语词汇学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 16(4): 47-51.
[12] 栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(1): 1-5.
[13] 莫雷, 张金桥. 文章阅读对写作的结构映射迁移的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(1): 27-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!