心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 225-233.

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

儿童攻击行为的短期追踪干预研究:从社会信息加工的角度

钟佑洁1, 李艳华1, 张进辅2   

  1. 1. 福州大学人文社科学院应用心理学系, 福州 350116;
    2. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 张进辅,E-mail:zhangjf@swu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangjf@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    福建省社科规划项目(2013C034);福建省教育厅A类社科项目(JA13048S);福建省教育科学“十二五”规划项目(JA12520S/FJCGZZ12019);福州大学人才启动基金项目(XRC201212)

A Short-term Intervention Study on the Children’s Aggressive Behavior:From the Perspective of Social Information Processing

ZHONG You-jie1, LI Yan-hua1, ZHANG Jin-fu2   

  1. 1. Department of Applied Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108;
    2. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-15

摘要: 以社会信息加工模型(Social Information-Processing Model, 简称SIP)为理论依据设计社会认知干预方案,将被试(包括132名攻击性儿童)分为实验组、安慰剂(阅读)组和控制组进行短期追踪干预研究,在此基础上考察该干预方案对减少儿童的攻击行为以及提高社会信息加工能力的作用。研究结果表明:(1)该干预方案对提高攻击性儿童的社会信息加工能力有明显的即时效果和持续效果,具体表现为该方案有效地减少了攻击性儿童的敌意归因偏见和攻击行为的产生,有助于攻击性儿童建立关系目标并正确认知攻击行为的后果;(2)班主任评定三组儿童的攻击行为显著减少,评定结果可能受到期望效应的影响。

关键词: 攻击行为, 社会信息加工模型, 干预研究

Abstract: The social cognitive intervention program was designed based on social information processing model (SIP) and further one short-term intervention study on the basis of the aggressive behaviors of 132 Children were carried out, respectively, by means of dividing those children into the experimental group, the placebo group and the control group. On this basis, the effect of this intervention program on both how to reduce the children's aggressive behaviors and improve their abilities in social information processing has been verified. The results show that: (1) the remarkable immediate effect and sustained effect of this intervention program on how to improve the capability of those aggressive children in the social information processing have been obtained, which mainly behaves as effectively reducing the aggressive children's hostile attribution bias and aggressive behaviors and further helping them to build an affiliation goal and to correctly understand the consequences of their aggressive behaviors via carrying outing the intervention program; (2) the aggressive behaviors in the three groups assessed by the teachers were greatly reduced after the intervention program, therefore, the assessment results were possibly affected by the experimenter' expectation.

Key words: aggressive behavior, Social Information Processing Model, intervention

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children's future social adjustment. Child Development, 67(5), 2317-2327.
Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 610-617.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
Crick, N. R., Werner, N. E., Casas, J. F., OBrien, K. M., Nelson, D. A., Grotpeter, J. K., et al. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In D. Bernstein (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 75-140). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Cunningham, J. A., Wild, T. C., Cordingley, J., Mierlo, T. V., & Humphreys, K. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers. Addiction, 104(12), 2023-2032.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755-764.
Dodge, K. A., & Godwin, J. (2013). Social-Information-Processing Patterns Mediate the Impact of Preventive Intervention on Adolescent Antisocial Behavior. Psychological Science 24(4), 456-465.
Fontaine, R. G., Tanha, M., Yang, C., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2010). Does response evaluation and decision (RED) mediate the relation between hostile attributional style and antisocial behavior in adolescence? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 615-626.
Fraser, M. W., Galinsky, M. J., Smokowski, P. R., Day, S. H., Terzian, M. A., Rose, R. A., et al. (2005). Social information-processing skills training to promote social competence and prevent aggressive behavior in the third grade. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1045-1055.
Heilbron, N., & Prinstein, M. J. (2008). A review and reconceptualization of social aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive correlates. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(4), 176-217.
Hudley, C., Britsch, B., Wakefield, W. D., Smith, T., Demorat, M., & Cho, S. J. (1998). An attribution retraining program to reduce aggression in elementary school students. Psychology in the Schools, 35(3), 271-282.
Hudley, C., & Graham, S. (1993). An attributional intervention to reduce peer-directed aggression among African-American boys. Child Development, 64(1), 124-138.
Hughes, J. N., Meehan, B. T., & Cavell, T. A. (2004). Development and validation of a gender-balanced measure of aggression-relevant social cognition. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(2), 292-302.
Kazdin, A. E., Siegel, T., & Bass, D. (1992). Cognitive problem-solving skills training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 733-747.
Leff, S. S., Gullan, R. L., Paskewich, B. S., Abdul-kabir, S., Jawad, A. F., Grossman, M., et al. (2009). An initial evaluation of a culturally adapted social problem-solving and relational aggression prevention program for urban African-American relationally aggressive girls. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 37(4), 260-274.
Li, J., Fraser, M. W., & c, Traci. L. W. (2013). Promoting social competence and preventing childhood aggression: A framework for applying social information processing theory in intervention research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(3), 357-364.
Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Carpenter, E. M., & Newman, J. E. (2002). Social skills training as a treatment for aggressive children and adolescents: a developmental-clinical integration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 169-199.
Orobiode Castro, B., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73(3), 916-934.
Underwood, M. K., Beron, K. J., & Rosen, L. H. (2011). Joint trajectories for social and physical aggression as predictors of adolescent maladjustment: Internalizing symptoms, rule-breaking behaviors, and borderline and narcissistic personality features. Development and Psychopathology, 23(2), 659-678.
Yoon, J., Hughes, J., Gaur, A., & Thompson, B. (1999). Social cognition in aggressive children: A metaanalytic review. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 6(4), 320-331.
陈英和, 崔艳丽, 耿柳娜. (2004). 关于"关系性攻击"研究的新进展. 心理科学, 27, 708-710.
杜红梅, 冯维. (2005). 移情与后果认知训练对儿童欺负行为影响的实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 2, 81-86.
桑标. (2004). 当代儿童发展心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
杨慧芳. (2001). 早期受虐经验与攻击行为——儿童和青少年攻击行为的社会信息加工模式研究简介. 当代青年研究(5), 23-25.
张文彩, 袁立壮, 陆运青, 罗劲 (2011). 安慰剂效应研究实验设计的历史和发展. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1115-1125.
[1] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[2] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[3] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[4] 刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[5] 金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 杨雪, 贾彦茹, 杨宏. 社会逆境感知对大学生攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 414-421.
[6] 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[7] 高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[8] 陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 任秀华, 张璐, 张亚利, 姜永志. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367.
[9] 何婷, 宋子婧, 丁菀, 刘伟, 蔺秀云. 父母心理控制与对立违抗障碍儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 219-228.
[10] 宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 675-682.
[11] 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 605-613.
[12] 孙丽君, 杜红芹, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 胡祥恩. 心理虐待与忽视对青少年攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 65-75.
[13] 夏天生, 刘君, 顾红磊, 董书亮. 父母冲突对青少年攻击行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 503-512.
[14] 杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 236-245.
[15] 高玲, 王兴超, 杨继平. 交往不良同伴对男性未成年犯攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(5): 625-632.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!