家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系：学业自我 效能的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用家庭社会经济地位、学业自我效能与学习投入量表,调查了953名初中生,运用结构方程模型探讨了家庭社会经济地位、学业自我效能与学习投入之间的关系。在控制学生性别、年级,以及先前学习成绩的影响后,结果发现:(1)家庭社会经济地位越高,学生对学习的投入就越多;(2)学业自我效能在家庭社会经济地位与学习投入之间起完全中介作用;(3)在家庭社会经济地位的组成成分与学习投入的关系中,家庭收入可以显著预测学习投入,而父母亲职业、父母亲教育水平对学习投入均无直接预测作用,它们是通过家庭收入的中介作用,再经过学业自我效能而影响学习投入。

关键词: 学习投入, 学业自我效能, 家庭社会经济地位, 中介效应, 初中生

Abstract: Socioeconomic status(SES) is one of the most widely studied constructs in the social sciences. Several ways of measuring SES have been proposed, but most include some quantification of family income, parental education, and occupational status. Research shows that SES is associated with a wide array of health, cognitive, and socioemotional outcomes in children, with effects beginning prior to birth and continuing into adulthood. High SES families afford their children an array of services, goods, parental actions, and social connections that potentially redound to the benefit of children and a concern that many low SES children lack access to those same resources and experiences, thus putting them at risk for developmental problems. It is expected that socioeconomic status is positively related to study engagement. Bandura's social-cognitive theory defines self-efficacy as the‘belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute the course of action required to produce given attainments'. It is expected that academic self-efficacy is positively related to study engagement because self-efficacy leads to a greater willingness to spend additional energy and effort on completing a task or an assignment and hence to more task involvement and absorption.Based on our conceptual model, the research formulated the following two hypotheses: H1: The better the social economic status, the more study engagement. H2: academic self-efficacy would serve as a mediator of the relationship between social economic status and study engagement. In order to examine and investigate the mediating effects of academic self-efficacy on the relationship between social economic status and study engagement, 953 students as subjects from 8 junior high schools in the cities of Nantong and Yancheng were chosen randomly. SEM results revealed that(1) social economic status have significantly positive direct influence on study engagement;(2)academic self-efficacy is one of the mediating factors between social economic status and study engagement;(3)The relationship between social economic status and study engagement is in nature through the influence of family income on study engagement, and parental education, occupational status are also through the influence of family income on study engagement. Academic self-efficacy is one of the mediating factors between family income and study engagement.

Key words: study engagement, academic self-efficacy, social economic status, mediating effects, juniorhigh school students

中图分类号:

G442

石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强. 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系：学业自我效能的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 71-78.

SHI Lei-shan, CHEN Ying-min, HOU Xiu, GAO Feng-qiang. Social Economic Status and Study Engagement：The Mediating Effects of Academic Self-efficacy among Junior High School Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(1): 71-78.

参考文献

Ackerman,B.P.,Brown,E.D.,& Izard,C.E.(2004).The relations between persistent poverty and contextual risk and children's behavior in elementary school.Developmental Psychology,40,3,367-377.
Artelt,C.,Baumert,J.,Julius-McElvaney,N.,& Peschar,J.(2003).Learners for life.Paris: OECD.
Avey,J.B.,Luthans,F.,Smith,R.M.,& Palmer,N.F.(2010).Impact of positive psychological capital on employee wellbeing over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,15,1,17-28.
Bandura,A.(1997).Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York:W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bradley,R.H.,& Corwyn,R.F.(2002).Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annual Review of Psychology,53,371-399.
Davis-Kean,P.E.(2005).The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement:The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment.Journal of Family Psychology,19,2,294-304.
Howell,A.J.(2009).Flourishing:Achievement-related correlates of students' well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology,4,1,1-13.
Klem,A.M.,& Connell,J.P.( 2004).Relationships matter:Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.Journal of School Health,74,7,262-273.
Matthews,K.A.,& Gallo,L.C.(2011).Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health.Annual Review of Psychology,62,4,1-30.
McLoyd,V.C.(1998).Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist,53,2,185-204.
Mistry,R.S.,Biesanz,J.C.,Taylor,L.C.,Burchinal,M.,& Cox,M.J.(2004).Family income and its relation to preschool children's adjustment for families in the NICHD study of early child care. Developmental Psychology,40,727-745.
Ouweneel,E., Pascale,M., Blanca,L.,& Schaufeli,W.B.(2011).Flourishing students: A longitudinal study on positive emotions,personal resources, and study engagement. The Journal of Positive Psychology,6,2,142-153.
Preacher,K.J.,Curran,P.J.,& Bauer,D.J.(2006).Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression,multilevel modeling,and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,31,437-448.
Randolph,K.A.,Fraser,M.W.,& Orthner,D.K.(2006).A strategy for assessing the impact of time varying family risk factors on high school dropout.Journal of Family Issues,27,933-950.
Salanova,M.,Schaufel,W.B.,Martinez,I.M.,& Breso,E.(2010).How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance:The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety,Stress and Coping,23,53-70.
Schaufeli,W.B.,Martinez,I.M.,Pinto,A.M.,Salanova,M.,& Bakker,A.B.(2002). Burnout and engagement in university students:A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33,464-481.
Sirin,S.R.(2005).Socioeconomic status and academic achievement:A meta-analytic review of research.Review of Educational Research,75,417-453.
Smith,J.R.,Brooks-Gunn,J.,& Klebanov,P.K.(1997).Consequences of living in poverty for young children's cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement.In G.J.Duncan & J.Brooks-Gunn(Eds.),Consequences of growing up poor (pp.132-189).New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
Terenzini,P.T.,Cabrera,A.F.,& Bernal,E.M.(2001).Swimming against the tide:The poor in American higher education.College Board Research Report.New York:The College Board.
Xanthopoulou,D.,Bakker,A.B.,Demerouti,E.,& Schaufeli,W.B.(2007).The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management,14,121-41.
冯晓杭,张向葵.(2008).城市贫困中学生自豪感、外显自尊与抑郁状态的关系.心理发展与教育,24,4,100-105.
梁宇颂.(2000).大学生成就目标,归因方式与学业自我效能感的研究.武汉:华中师范大学.硕士论文.
卢谢峰,韩立敏.(2008).家庭社会经济地位对小学生自我概念的影响.中国心理卫生杂志,22,1,24-25.
莫雷.(2007).全社会都要关心社会经济地位不利儿童的成长.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),6,103.
倪士光,伍新春.(2011).学习投入:概念、测量与相关变量.心理研究,4,1,81-87.
任春荣.(2010).学生家庭社会经济地位(SES)的测量技术.教育学报,5,77-82.
师保国,申继亮.(2007).家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系.心理发展与教育,1,30-34.
石雷山,高峰强,沈永江.(2011).班级集体效能对初中生学业自我效能与学习倦怠的调节作用.心理发展与教育,3,299-306.
徐夫真,张文新,张玲玲.(2009).家庭功能对青少年疏离感的影响:有调节的中介效应.心理学报,41,12,1165-1174.
温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.(2004).中介效应检验程序及其应用.心理学报,36,614-620.
王宝华,冯晓霞,肖树娟,苍翠.(2010). 家庭社会经济地位与儿童学习品质及入学认知准备之间的关系.学前教育研究,184,4,3-9.
王金霞,王吉春.(2005).中学生自尊水平与家庭因素的关系.中国心理卫生杂志,19,10,667-669.
张信勇,卞小华,徐光兴.(2008).高中生的学习投入及其与应激的关系.中国健康心理学杂志,16,11,1246-1248.
祝蜻媛.(2008).中学生学习倦怠及其影响因子.上海:华东师范大学.硕士论文.
张卫,李董平,谢志杰.(2007).低社会经济地位与儿童发展.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),6,104-118.
张晓,陈会昌,张银娜,孙炳海.(2009).家庭收入与儿童早期的社会能力:中介效应与调节效应.心理学报,141,7,613-623.

相关文章 15

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[3]	杨宝琰, 马熙凤, 臧鸿瑜, 毛海燕. 经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响：家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 83-92.
[4]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[5]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[6]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[7]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[8]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[9]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[10]	李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[11]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[12]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[13]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[14]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[15]	郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系：自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed