心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 119-123.

• 研究方法与工具 • 上一篇    下一篇

幼师生职业决策自我效能感问卷的初步编制

李春花1, 赵丽丽2, 王大华1, 张娜1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
    2. 北京市幼儿师范学校, 北京, 100037
  • 出版日期:2008-04-15 发布日期:2008-04-15

Study on the Structure of Career Decision Self-Efficacy of Prospective Preschool Teachers

LI Chun-hua1, ZHAO Li-li2, WANG Da-hua1, ZHANG Na1   

  1. 1. Institute of Development Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Preschool Teachers Training school, Beijing 100037
  • Online:2008-04-15 Published:2008-04-15

摘要: 以344名幼儿师范学校的学生为被试,检验了自编《幼师生职业决策自我效能感问卷》的信效度,同时考察了幼师生职业决策自我效能感的特点。结果显示:(1)《幼师生职业决策自我效能感问卷》具有良好的结构效度和效标效度;(2)对幼师生职业决策自我效能感的方差分析发现,生源地与年级的主效应不显著;(3)喜欢幼师专业与否的主效应显著,平均数比较发现,喜欢幼师专业的学生在职业决策自我效能感及其五个维度上的得分都显著地高于不喜欢幼师专业的学生;(4)生源地与年级、生源地与对幼师专业的兴趣以及年级与对幼师专业的兴趣的交互作用均不显著。

关键词: 幼师生, 职业决策, 自我效能感

Abstract: Based on a sample of 334 prospective preschool teachers (PPT), the present study validated the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale for Prospective Preschool Teachers (CDSES-PPT), and examined the characteristics of prospective preschool teachers' career decision self-efficacy. The result of study on the scale indicated that CDSES-PPT had good validity and acceptable reliability. The result of study on PPT's career decision-making self-efficacy indicated that there are no differences between the urban PPT and the rural PPT Things are the same with the 3 grades. The PPT who likes their specialty scored higher on all the 5 dimensions than those who don't like their specialty. There are no differences in the 3 interactions.

Key words: prospective preschool teachers, career decision self-efficacy, structure

[1] Hackett G,Betz N.A Self-Efficncy Approach to the Career Development of Women.Journal of Vocational Behavior,1981,18:326-339.
[2] Betz N,ltackett G.Applications of self-efficacy theory to understanding career choice behavior.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.1986,4:279-289.
[3] Saks A,Ashforth B.Effects of individual differences and job search behaviors On the employment stains of recent university graduates.Journal of Vocational Behavior,1999.54:335-349.
[4] Weiner B.Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application within an attributional framework.In R.Ames & C.Ames (Eds.),Research on Motivation in Education.Toronto,ON:Academic Press,1984,1:15-38.
[5] 彭永新,龙立荣.大学生职业决策自我效能测评的研究.应用心理学,2001,7(2):38-43.
[6] 郑日昌,张彬彬.择业效能感结构的验证性因素分析.心理学报,2002,25(1):91-92.
[7] 胡艳红.大学生择业效能感的因素分析及其于职业兴趣、职业价值观的关系研究.西安:陕西师范大学,2003.
[8] Bandura.A Self-efficacy:The exercise of control.New York:W.H.Freeman.1997.
[9] Ching K.A comparative study on career self-efficacy and perceptions of career dncision-making among secondary students with gifts talents.Ann Arhor:university of northern Colorado,2002.
[10] Rottinghaus P,Larson L,Borgen F.The relation of self-efficacy and interests:An analysis of 60 samples.Journal of Vocational Behavior,2003.62:221-236.
[11] Lent R,Brown S,Hackett G.Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest,choice and performance.Journal of Vncatiohal Behavior.1994.45:79-122.
[1] 韩建涛, 钱俊妮, 张婕妤, 庞维国. 创造力与大学生生命意义感:积极情绪和创造性自我效能感的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 187-195.
[2] 谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 叶桥键, 杨喜兰. 导师排斥感知对研究生科研创造力的影响:科研自我效能感和科研焦虑的双向链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 833-841.
[3] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[4] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[5] 李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[6] 谢韵梓, 吴继霞, 王诗成, 阳泽. 儿童期情感忽视对大学生抑郁的影响:控制感与情绪调节自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 407-417.
[7] 楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[8] 贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.
[9] 叶宝娟, 孙原, 高良, 夏扉, 杨强. 主动性人格与大学生职业成熟度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 304-310.
[10] 李松, 冉光明, 张琪, 胡天强. 中国背景下自我效能感与心理健康的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 759-768.
[11] 周宵, 伍新春, 王文超, 田雨馨. 汶川地震8.5年后青少年的社会支持与创伤后成长的关系:自我效能感和自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 573-580.
[12] 郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.
[13] 段朝辉, 洪建中. 网络视频课程中师生交互与大学生网络学习绩效的关系:学习自我效能感与学习动机的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 184-191.
[14] 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.
[15] 张婕, 黄碧娟, 司继伟, 官冬晓. 乡镇小学生的数学焦虑与数学成绩:数学自我效能感和数学元认知的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 453-460.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!