合作学习小组的认知风格对其问题解决的影响

心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 102-107.

合作学习小组的认知风格对其问题解决的影响

王静, 陈英和

北京师范大学发展心理学所, 北京, 100875

出版日期:2008-04-15 发布日期:2008-04-15
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001);国家自然科学基金项目(30770729);北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(06BaJY010)

The Influence of Cognitive Style in Cooperative Learning Group to It’s Problem Solving

WANG Jing, CHEN Ying-he

Institute of Development Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Online:2008-04-15 Published:2008-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以认知风格为依据,将合作学习小组分为场依存同质组、场独立同质组及异质组,通过小组对开放问题以及逻辑问题的解决,考察不同认知风格个体、不同类型小组的问题解决水平。结果表明:(1)个体认知风格的作用依任务性质不同而不同。(2)异质组中存在的个体之间的差异会成为有效沟通合作的障碍,进而影响异质组的问题解决水平,影响程度受到问题本身对沟通合作要求程度的影响。(3)异质分组能更好解决开放性问题。

关键词: 合作学习, 认知风格, 问题解决水平

Abstract: 307 participants were divided into homogeneous field dependent group, homogeneous field independent group and heterogeneous group by the cognitive style of individual. The problem solving level of individual and group were investigated in two kinds of problem setting: open-end problem setting and reasoning problem setting. The results are as follows: (1) The field independent individuals open-end problem solving level were significant better than that of field dependent individuals, but there is no significance between field dependent individuals and field independent individuals in reasoning problem solving level. (2) The diversity between individuals in cooperat ive group was the obstacle of group members, and that would influence the problem solving level. To which degree the diversity would influence the problem solving dependent on how much communication and collaboration did the problem itself need. (3) Compare to reasoning problem solving, heterogeneous group do better in open-end problem solving.

Key words: cooperative learning, cognitive style, problem solving

王静, 陈英和. 合作学习小组的认知风格对其问题解决的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 102-107.

WANG Jing, CHEN Ying-he. The Influence of Cognitive Style in Cooperative Learning Group to It’s Problem Solving[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(2): 102-107.

参考文献

[1] Wang T.Theory and practice of cooperative learning(in Chinese).Beijing:China Personnel Publish House,2002 23-50.(王坦.合作学习的理念与实施[M].北京:中国人事出版社,2002.23-50).
[2] Melser A N.Gifted students and cooperative learning:A study of grouping strategies.Roeper Review,1999,21(4):315.
[3] Webber S S.Donahueb L M.Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and perfennance:A Meta-analysis.Journal of Management.2001.27:141-162.
[4] Bowers C A.Pharmer J A,Salas E.When member homogeneity is needed in work teams.Small Group Research,2000,31(3):306-327.
[5] Bunderson J S,Sutcliffe K M.Comparing alternative conceptualization of fouctional diversity in management teams:Process and performance effect.Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(5):875-893.
[6] Harrison D A,Price K H.Time,teams,and task performance:changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning.Academy of Management Journal.2002,45(5):1029-1045.
[7] Witkin H A.Coodenough D R.Field dependence and interpersonal behavior.Psychological Bulletin.1977.84:661-689.
[8] Witkin H A,Coodenough D R.Cognitive styles:Essence and origins.New York:International Universities press.1981:1-141.
[9] Stoyanov S,Kirschncr P.Effect of oroblem solving support and cognitive styles on idea generation:Implications for technology-enhanced learning.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,2007,40(1):49-63.
[10] Halihill T,Sundstrom E,Labor J.Group personality composition and group effectiveness.Small Group Research,2005.36(1):83-105.
[11] Priola V,Smith J.Armstrong S J.Groupwork and cognitive style.Sinail Croup Research,2004,35(5):565-595.
[12] Armstrong S J,Priola V.Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams.Sinail Group Research,2001,32(3):283-312.
[13] Gibson C B.Quality of team service:The role of field independent eulture,quality orientation.and quality improvement focus.Small Group Research,2003,34(5):619-646.
[14] Aritzeta A,Senior B.Swailes S.Team role preference and cognitive styles.Small Group Research,2005,36(4):404-436.
[15] Mohammed S,Angell L C.Personality heterogencity in teams:which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research,2003,34(6):651-677.
[16] Pesensolido A T.Group efficacy and group effectiveness.Small Group Research,2003,34(1):20-42.

相关文章 11

[1]	张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[2]	胡卫平, 赵晓媚, 贾培媛, 陈英和. 学思维网络活动对小学生创造性的影响:认知风格的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 257-264.
[3]	仝宇光, 刘畅, 宋耀武. 合作学习情境下监控者监控发音任务中的定向遗忘效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 183-190.
[4]	马军朋, 叶卓尔, 林依, 高宏巍, 黄平, 林慧妍, 许欢, 杨楠, 金花. 认知风格影响归类过程中的神经活动-来自fMRI研究的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 139-148.
[5]	程丽芳, 胡卫平, 贾小娟. 认知抑制对艺术创造力的影响:认知风格的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 287-295.
[6]	陈英和, 郝嘉佳. 冲动-思考型儿童在拼图游戏中的问题解决及元认知差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(3): 241-246.
[7]	韩秀, 裴燕红. 大学生智力与认知风格对内隐序列学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 48-53.
[8]	康诚, 周爱保. 信息呈现方式与学习者的个性特征对多媒体环境下学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 83-91.
[9]	吴国来, 沃建中, 白学军, 沈德立. 不同认知风格11岁儿童内隐序列学习的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 39-42.
[10]	李力红, 常逢锦, 刘便凤. 两种教学方法对不同认知风格11岁儿童数学学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 55-59.
[11]	杨卫星, 王学臣, 张梅玲. 不同认知风格学生的问题共性意识水平对解题迁移的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(2): 17-21,27.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed