概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响

心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 83-87.

概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响

龚德英¹, 刘电芝², 张大均¹

1. 西南大学教育科学研究所, 重庆, 400715;
2. 苏州大学教育学院, 苏州, 215021

出版日期:2008-01-15 发布日期:2008-01-15
通讯作者: 刘电芝,苏州大学教育学院教授.E-mail:liudzh@vip.163.com E-mail:liudzh@vip.163.com
基金资助:
全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(批准号:200509)

The Effect of Abstract and Background Music on Cognitive Load and Multimedia Learning

GONG De-ying¹, LIU Dian-zhi², ZHANG Da-jun¹

1. Research Institute of Educational Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
2. School of Education, Suzhou University, Suzhou 215021

Online:2008-01-15 Published:2008-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 让学生学习多媒体呈现的有关移动通讯基础知识的材料,采用2(概述:概述vs.无概述)×2(背景音乐:有音乐vs.无音乐)的被试间设计,考察两因素对自评认知负荷、记忆和迁移成绩的影响.结果表明:两因素无交互作用;概述组的认知负荷显著低于无概述组,迁移成绩显著高于无概述组,两组记忆成绩没有显著差异;有背景音乐组的记忆成绩显著低于无音乐组,两组认知负荷和迁移成绩没有显著差异.

关键词: 概述, 背景音乐, 认知负荷, 多媒体学习

Abstract: This study is intended to investigate the effect of abstract and background music on learner's self-rating cognitive load and learning performance,and students are requested to learn material about mobile communication with multimedia presentation.The results are as follows:(1) there was no interaction between abstract and background music;(2) students who were asked to abstract the material got lower scores on cognitive load and higher scores on transfer test than those who are not asked to do that,but there was no significant difference on retention test between the two groups;(3) students learned with background music got lower scores on retention test than those without music,while there was no significant difference on cognitive load and transfer test between them.

Key words: abstract, background music, multimedia leaning, cognitive load

中图分类号:

G442

龚德英, 刘电芝, 张大均. 概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 83-87.

GONG De-ying, LIU Dian-zhi, ZHANG Da-jun. The Effect of Abstract and Background Music on Cognitive Load and Multimedia Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(1): 83-87.

参考文献

[1] Sweller J.Cognitive load during problem solving:effects on learning.Cognitive Science,1988,12(2),257-285.
[2] Paas F G W C,van Merriemboer J J G.Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills:A cngnitive-lcad approach.Journal of Educational Psychology,1994,86(1),122-133.
[3] Paas F G W C,Tuovinsn J E,Taëbbers H,et al.Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory.Educational Psychologist,2003,38(1),63-71.
[4] Brünkon B B,Plass J,Leumer D.Direct measurement of cngnitive load in multimedia learning.Educational Psychologist,2003,38(1),53-61.
[5] Sweller J,van Merriënhoer J J G,Paas F G W C.Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review,1998,10(3),251-296.
[6] Sweller J.Cognitive load theory,learning difficulty,and instructional design.Learning and Instruction,1994,4(3),295-312.
[7] Bannert M.Managing engnitive load——Recent trends in cognitive load theory.Learning and Instruction,2002,12(1),139-146.
[8] Sweller J.The worked example effect and human cognition.Learnlng and Instruction.2006,16(2),165-169
[9] Van Merriënhoer J J G,Kirsclmer P A,Kester L.Taking the load of a learner's mind:Instructional design for complex learning.Educational Psychologist,2003,38(1),5-13.
[10] Gerjets P,Scheiter K,Catramhone R.Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load:Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures,Instructional Science,2004,32(1),33-58.
[11] Moreno R,Mayer R E.A coherence effed in multimedia learning:the case of minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional message.Journal of Educational Psychology,2000,92(1),117-125.
[12] Brünken R B,Ptaso J.Leutner D.Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology:Auditory load and modality effects.Instructional Science,2004.32(1),115-132.
[13] 张彤,赵翠霞,郑锡宁.基于认知理论的多媒体教学界面设计研究.心理科学,2004,27(6),1502-1505.
[14] Whelan R R.Neuruimaging of cognitive load in instructional multimedia.Educational Research Review.2006,In press,http://from www.sciencedimct,com
[15] Pans F,Van Merriënhoer J J G.The efficiency of instructional conditions:an approach to combine mental effort and performance Measures,Human Factors 1993,35(3),737-743.

相关文章 14

[1]	于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[2]	王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 张洋, 赵庆柏, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608.
[3]	陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 619-627.
[4]	袁娟娟, 杨炀, 郑志伟, 刘萍萍. 图文横排促进低熟悉词汇再认:基于8岁儿童和成人证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 525-538.
[5]	刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦. 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 257-265.
[6]	周丽, 王福兴, 谢和平, 陈佳雪, 辛亮, 赵庆柏. 积极的情绪能否促进多媒体学习?基于元分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 697-709.
[7]	王舒, 殷悦, 王婷, 刘国芳, 罗俊龙. 教学设计中的成绩表现和心流体验:基于认知负荷视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 329-337.
[8]	王玉鑫, 谢和平, 王福兴, 安婧, 郝艳斌. 多媒体学习的图文整合:空间邻近效应的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 565-578.
[9]	李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响:学习者经验与偏好的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 453-462.
[10]	钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎. 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.
[11]	龚少英, 段婷, 王福兴, 周宗奎, 卢春晓. 装饰图片影响多媒体学习的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 403-410.
[12]	段朝辉, 颜志强, 王福兴, 周宗奎. 动画呈现速度对多媒体学习效果影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 46-53.
[13]	康诚, 周爱保. 信息呈现方式与学习者的个性特征对多媒体环境下学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 83-91.
[14]	曹宝龙, 刘慧娟, 林崇德. 认知负荷对小学生工作记忆资源分配策略的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(1): 36-42.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed