初中数学优差生注意转换中的线索和准备效应

心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 23-28.

初中数学优差生注意转换中的线索和准备效应

齐冰^1,2, 白学军¹, 沈德立¹

1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院天津300074;
2. 河北大学教育学院保定071002

出版日期:2007-04-15 发布日期:2007-04-15
作者简介:齐冰(1975- ),女,河北大学教育学院助教,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院博士生.E-mail:bdqb@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
天津市科委重大攻关项目;国家社科“十一五”规划基金重点项目;教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目;全国教育科学十五规划项目(FBB030748)资助

Effects of Cue and Preparation in Shifting Attention of High-and Low-proficiency Junior High School Learners of Math

QI bing^1,2, BAI Xue-jun¹, SHEN De-li¹

1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2. Department of Psychology, Hebei University, Baoding 071002

Online:2007-04-15 Published:2007-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选取34名初中数学优差生为被试,采用任务转换实验考察其注意转换中的线索效应和准备效应.结果表明:一般转换代价出现了线索效应和准备效应,特定转换代价仅出现了线索效应,优生比差生更善于利用线索和准备间距提高任务转换成绩.

关键词: 注意转换, 任务转换, 线索效应, 准备效应

Abstract: The paradigm of task switching was used to examine the effects of cue and preparation in shifting attention. The subjects were 34 high-and low-proficiency junior high school learners of math. The results indicated that there were significant effects of cue and preparation for general switch cost;and there were only significant effects of cue for special switch cost. High-proficiency learners could make better preparations for the incoming trail through cue and preparation interval than low-proficiency learners.

Key words: shifting attention, task switching paradigm, effects of cue, effects of preparation

中图分类号:

B844.2

齐冰, 白学军, 沈德立. 初中数学优差生注意转换中的线索和准备效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 23-28.

QI bing, BAI Xue-jun, SHEN De-li. Effects of Cue and Preparation in Shifting Attention of High-and Low-proficiency Junior High School Learners of Math[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(2): 23-28.

参考文献

[1] 曾盼盼,俞国良.数学学习不良的研究及趋势.心理科学进展,2002,10(1):48-56.
[2] 杨锦平,金惠国,黄财兴.学习困难初中生注意特性发展及影响因素研究.心理发展与教育,1995(1):54-59.
[3] Wager T D,Jonides J,Reading S.Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention:a meta-analysis.NeuroImage,2004,22:1679-1693.
[4] Monsell S.Task switching.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:134-140.
[5] Mayr U,Keele S W.Changing internal constraints on action:the role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2000,129(1):4-26.
[6] De Jong R.Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2001,13(1/2):71-89.
[7] Reimers S,Maylor E A.Task Switching Across the Life Span:Effects of Age on General and Specific Switch Costs.Developmental Psychology,2005,41(4):661-671.
[8] Rourke B P.Arithmetic disabilities,specific and otherwise:neuropsychological perspective.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1993,26,214-226.
[9] 林镜秋,杨广兴,李桂荣等.关于中学生注意品质的实验报告.教育改革,1994(5):21-22.
[10] 林镜秋.大中小学生注意转移的实验研究.天津师范大学学报,1996,(6):33-37.
[11] 刘卿,杨凤池,张曼华等.学习困难儿童的注意力品质初探.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(4):220-221.
[12] 张曼华,刘卿.注意力品质对小学生学习成绩的影响.健康心理学杂志,1999,7(3):335-337.
[13] 张曼华,杨凤池,张宏伟.学习困难儿童注意力特点研究.中国学校卫生,2004,25(2):202-203.
[14] Rubinstein J S,Meyer D E,Evans J E.Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance,2001,27,763-797.
[15] Rogers R D,Monsell S.Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1995,124,207-231.
[16] Rothermund K,Wentura D,De Houwer J.Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations 88 a source of negative priming[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2005,31(3):482-495.
[17] Saeki E.Effect of articulatary suppression on task-switching performance:implications for models of working memory.Memory,2004,12(3):257-271.
[18] Bull R.Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children's Mathematics Ability:Inhibition,Switching,and Working Memory.Developmental Neuropsychology,2001,19(3):273-293.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed