心理发展与教育 ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 97-102.

• 研究方法与工具 • 上一篇    下一篇

二分数据的多层线性模型:原理与应用

李雪燕, 辛涛   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理学研究所, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2006-10-15 发布日期:2006-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 辛涛(1968-),男,北京师范大学发展心理学研究所教授.E-mail:xintao@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xintao@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市重点实验室建设规划项目(jd100270541)资助

Hierarchical Linear Model for Binary Data: Principle and Application

LI Xue-yan, XIN Tao   

  1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2006-10-15 Published:2006-10-15

摘要: 分类数据的多层线性模型在我国的心理学研究中鲜有使用。本研究旨在将这种模型引入到我国心理学研究之中。论文首先介绍了二分数据的多层线性模型的原理和假设条件、参数估计和假设检验,然后以6187名小学生为被试,采用二分变量的多层线性模型,说明了个体因素和学校因素对儿童攻击行为的影响,并对分析结果进行了解释。

关键词: 多层线性模型, 二分数据, 攻击行为

Abstract: Hierarchical linear models for categorical data are seldom applied in the field of psychological research in China.The study was aimed to show the usage of this approach to psychological research.In this paper, the authors first introduce the principles and assumptions for hierarchical linear models for binary data, the estimation of parameters and the hypothesis testing for the models.Then based on a binary data coming from the Assessment of Elementary School Students' Quality in Beijing, they modeled the hierarchical linear model to illustrate the effects of individual and school level factors on children's aggressive behaviors.

Key words: hierarchical linear model, binary data, aggressive behavior

[1] Bryk A S,Raudenbush S W.Hierarchical linear models:applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park,CA:Sage,1992.
[2] Burstein L.The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation.Review of Research in Education,1980,8:158-233.
[3] Cronbach L J.Research on classroom and school:formulations of questions design and analysis.Stanford,CA:Stanford Evaluation Consortium.1976.
[4] Mason W M,Wong G M,Entwistle B.Contextual analysis through the multilevel linear model.Sociological Methodology,1983,13:72-103.
[5] Goldstein H.Multilevel models in educational and social research.London:Griffin.1987.
[6] Goldstein H.Multilevel statistical models.London:Edward Arnold,2nd.1995.
[7] Stiratelli R,Laird N,Ware J.Random effects models for serial observations with binary response.Biometrics,1984,40:961-971.
[8] Wong G,Mason W.The hierarchical logistic regression model for multilevel analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association,1985,80:513-524.
[9] Breslow N,Clayton D.Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models.Journal of the American Statistical Association,1993,88:9~25.
[10] Goldstein,Goldstein H.Nonlinear multilevel models with an application to discrete response data.Biometrika,1991,78:45-51.
[11] Goldstein H,Rasbash J.Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary response.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A,1996,159:505-514.
[12] Yang M L.Increasing the efficiency in estimating multilevel Bernoulli models.East Lansing,1998.
[13] Rodriguez G,Goldman N.An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A,1995,158:73-89.
[14] Rodriguez G,Goldman N.Multilevel models with binary response:a comparison of estimation procedures.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the population association of America,Washington,DC,1997,27-29.
[15] Guo G,Zhao H.Multilevel modeling for binary data.Annual Review of sociology.2000,26.441-462.
[16] Gonstantine N,Curry K,Diaz M,Huh-Kim J.Factors associated with aggressive behavior of rural middle school students.Poster presented at the eight Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence,Chicago,2000.
[17] Bosworth K.Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students.Journal of Early Adolescence,1999,19:341-362.
[18] Olweus D.Bullying at school:What we know and what we can do.Cambridge,MA:Blackwell,1993.
[19] Hart C H,DeWolf M D,Burrs D C.Linkage among preschoolers'playground behavior,outcome expections,and parental disciplinary strategies.Early Education Development,1992,3:265-283.
[20] McFayden-Ketchum S A,Bates J E,Dodge K A,Petit G S.Patterns of change in early childhood aggressive-disruptive behavior:Gender differences in predictions from early coercive and affectionate mother-child interactions.Child Development,1996,67:2417-2433.
[21] Xin T,Zhou Z.The structure of self-reported problem behaviors in Chinese children.Pshychology in the School,2003,40(1):19-33.
[22] Cheong Y F,Raudenbush S W.Measurement and structural models for children's problem bebavior.Pshchological Methods,2000,5:477-495.
[23] 寇彧,辛涛.北京市小学生心理素质发展水平评估报告.教育科学研究,2001,10:17-22.
[1] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[2] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[3] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[4] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[5] 刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[6] 金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 杨雪, 贾彦茹, 杨宏. 社会逆境感知对大学生攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 414-421.
[7] 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[8] 高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[9] 陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 任秀华, 张璐, 张亚利, 姜永志. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367.
[10] 何婷, 宋子婧, 丁菀, 刘伟, 蔺秀云. 父母心理控制与对立违抗障碍儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 219-228.
[11] 宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 675-682.
[12] 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 605-613.
[13] 孙丽君, 杜红芹, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 胡祥恩. 心理虐待与忽视对青少年攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 65-75.
[14] 夏天生, 刘君, 顾红磊, 董书亮. 父母冲突对青少年攻击行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 503-512.
[15] 杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 236-245.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!