心理发展与教育 ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 12-16.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

3~4岁儿童规则因果推理能力的训练研究

龚银清1, 李红2, 盛礼萍1   

  1. 1. 湖州师范学院教育科学与技术学院, 浙江, 湖州, 313000;
    2. 西南大学心理学院, 重庆市基础心理学重点实验室, 重庆, 北碚, 400715
  • 出版日期:2006-10-15 发布日期:2006-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 李红,男,西南大学心理学院教授,博士生导师.E-mail:lihongl@swu.edu.cn E-mail:lihongl@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(30370488);国家级重点学科重大项目(西国重04019)资助

Training Studies on Rule-based Causal Reasoning in Children Aged 3 to 4 Years

GONG Yin-qing1, LI Hong2, SHENG Li-ping1   

  1. 1. Educational Science of Huzhou Teacher's College, Zhejiang 313000;
    2. School of Psychology, Southwest University, Key Laboratory of Basic Psychology, Beipei, Chongqing 400715
  • Online:2006-10-15 Published:2006-10-15

摘要: 学前期是儿童多种推理能力产生和发展的重要时期。本研究(以64名3岁儿童为被试,采用Frye和Zelazo等所设计的“二进二出”装置,通过对3岁儿童的规则因果推理能力进行训练,从而探索儿童规则因果推理的内在机制。在本研究条件下,结果发现:1.年龄与训练的交互效应不显著,各年龄组儿童经过训练后,成绩的提高没有显著差异;2.规则与训练的交互效应显著,竖直规则下,儿童通过训练后提高的成绩不显著,但在交叉规则下前测后测成绩差异极其显著;3.训练效应显著,暴露因果机制,给予及时反馈和阐述规则时附加手势这些信息能促进年幼儿童对高级规则的掌握。

关键词: 3~4岁儿童, 规则因果推理, 能力, 训练

Abstract: This experiment studied the internal mechanism of rule-based causal reasoning by training children aged 3 to 4 years in rule-based causal reasoning with a ramp apparatus with two input holes and two output holes.Results revealed that: (1) there was no significant interaction between age and training, the improved performances were not significantly different after training; (2) there was significant interaction between rule type and training.the improved performances were significant ly different between straight rule-based group reasoning and across rule-based reasoning group; (3) The results indicate that providing such redundant non-verbal cues as the ramp uncovered to reveal mechanical shunts, feedback and gesture can facilitate children' use of complex rule systems.

Key words: children aged 3 to 4 years, rule based causal reasoning, capacity, training

[1] Frye D,Zelazo P D,Palfai T.Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning.Cognitive Development,1995,10:483-527.
[2] Douglas D,Frye D,Zelazo P D.Inference and Action in Early Causal Reasoning.Developmental Psychology,1996,32:120-131.
[3] 李红,郑持军,高雪梅.推理方向与规则维度对儿童因果推理的影响研究心理学报,2004,36(5):550-557.
[4] 王儒芳,李红.学前儿童规则推理的研究进展及影响因素.学前教育研究,2004,1:21-24.
[5] Li H,Zheng C,Gao X et al.The Influence of Complexity and Reasoning Direction on Children's Causal Reasoning,Cognitive Development,2005,20(1):87-101.
[6] 龚银清,李红.学前儿童二维合取规则推理能力的发展.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,22(4):58-63.
[7] Dempaster F.The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism:Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging,Development Review,1992,12:45-75.
[8] Samuels M C,Brooks P J,Frye D.Strategic game playing through the windows task..British Journal of Development Psychology,1996,14:159-172.
[9] Gelman R,Bullock M,Meck E.Preschools' understanding of simple object transformations.Child Developmen,1980,51:691-699.
[10] 李富洪,李红,陈安涛等.物体颜色与质地相似度对幼儿归纳推理的影响.心理学报,2005,37(2):199-209.
[11] Mandler J M.How to build a baby:Ⅱ.Conceptual primitives.Psychological Review,1992,99:587-604.
[12] McNeill D.Hand and mind:What gestures reveal about thoughts.Chicago,IL:The University of Chicago Press.1992:685-687.
[13] Schaffer H R,Hepburn A,Collis G M.Verbal and nonverbal aspects of mothers' directives.Journal of Child Language,1983,10:335-367.
[14] Franco F,Butterworth G.Pointing and social awareness:Declaring and requesting in the second year.Journal of Child of Language,1996,32:120-131.
[15] Kendon A.Do gestures communicate? Research on Language and Social Interaction,1994,27:175-200.
[16] Alibali M W,Goldin-Meadow S.Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning:What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind.Cognitive Psychology,1993,25:468-523.
[17] Siegler R S,Liebert R M.Effects of presenting relevant rules aud complete feedback on the conversation of liquid quantity task.Developmental Psychology,1972,7:133-138.
[18] Sophian C,Huber A.Early developments in children's early causal judgments.Child Development,1984,55:512-526.
[1] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[2] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[3] 程阳春, 黄瑾. 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[4] 刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[5] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[6] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[7] 刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[8] 姚琳, 刘福会, 李伟强, 张晓琪, 袁博. 能力社会比较与归因反馈对不诚实行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[9] 杨晨, 连帅磊, 陈春宇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 同伴依恋与初中生手机成瘾的关系:有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 538-545.
[10] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[11] 葛国宏. 成人依恋与心理理论的关系:认知融合与经验性回避的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 223-235.
[12] 占淑玮, 杨宁, 赵必华. 留守学前儿童接受性语言能力与社会退缩的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[13] 邓珏, 叶子青, 周加仙. 音乐训练对统计学习能力的促进作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 904-912.
[14] 田瑾, 毛亚庆, 熊华夏. 变革型领导对教师职业倦怠的影响:社会情感能力和幸福感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 743-751.
[15] 杨文敏, 鲁嘉晨, 谭欣, 梁静远, 雷怡. 大学生主观童年创伤症状对抑郁的影响:抗挫折能力和外向性的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 128-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!