心理发展与教育 ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 23-28.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同攻击/受欺负类别儿童的同伴交往自我知觉

周宗奎, 蔡春凤, 赵冬梅   

  1. 华中师范大学心理系, 武汉, 430079
  • 出版日期:2006-04-15 发布日期:2006-04-15
  • 作者简介:周宗奎,男,华中师范大学心理系教授.E-mail:zkzhou@ccnu-1.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金项目(项目号30270473)

Self-perceived Peer Relationship Among Different Aggression/Victims Groups

ZHOU Zong-kui, CAI Chun-feng, ZHAO Dong-mei   

  1. Department of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Online:2006-04-15 Published:2006-04-15

摘要: 以474名小学三、四、五、六年级的儿童为被试,考察了不同攻击-受欺负类型儿童自我知觉的社会能力以及自我提名的朋友与双向互选朋友数量、同伴积极提名、消极提名的关系。结果表明,各攻击/受欺负组别在自我提名的朋友数量上无显著差异,但在自我知觉的社会能力、双向互选朋友数及同伴积极提名、消极提名上均存在显著差异。在自我知觉的社会能力方面,单纯攻击组最高,攻击-受欺负组最低。在双向互选朋友以及同伴积极提名方面,未参与组最高,其余依次为单纯攻击组、单纯受欺负组和攻击-受欺负组。

关键词: 攻击-受欺负类型, 自我知觉的社会能力, 朋友, 同伴提名

Abstract: This study tested the social competence of different aggression/victims groups and the relations between the scores of friend and mutual-chosen friend and peer nominated like-most and like-least.Participants were 474 elmentary school children from the third grade to the sixth grade.The results indicated that there was no significant differences on the number of self-nominated friend among different aggression/victims groups,but there was significant differences on self-perceived social competence,the number of mutual-chosen friend.and peer like-most nominations.On self-perceived social competence,the pure-aggression group had the highest scores,and the aggressive-victimized group had the lowest scores.On mutual-chosen friend.and peer like-most nominations,noninvolved group had the highest scores,and follows the pure-aggression,pure-victim,and aggressive-victimized groups.

Key words: aggression/victims groups, self-perceived social competence, friend, peer nominations

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] 张增修.攻击型受欺儿童的社会行为与心理调节.心理科学,2003,26(4):650-653.
[2] 杨慧芳.攻击行为的社会信息加工模式研究述评.心理科学,2002,25(2):244-245.
[3] 章志光.社会心理学.北京:人民教育出版社,1998:p98.
[4] 张文新.儿童社会性发展.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2002:p385.
[5] Xinyin C,Carla Z,Alida L C.et al.Self-perception of competence in Brazilian,Canadian,Chinese and Italian children:Relations with social and school adjustment,Internatioal Journal of Behavioral Development,2004,28(2)129-138.
[6] 周海咏,丁云霞,郑希付.关于欺负类儿童自我概念的研究.心理学探新,2003,23(1):59-62.
[7] Hymel S,Bowker A,Woody E.Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children:Variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains.Child Development,1993,64:879-896.
[8] Gttheil N F,Dubow E F.The interrelationships of behavioral indices of bully and victim behavior,Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association,2000,4-8.
[9] Hawker D S J,Boulton M J.Twenty years' research on peer victimizationand psychosocial maladjustment:a meta-analytic review of crosssectional studies.Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2000,41(4):44-45.
[10] Hess L E,Atkins M S.Victims and aggressors at school:teacher,self,and peer perceptions of psychosocial functioning.Applied Developmental Science,1998,2(2):75-89.
[11] 张文新,谷传华.小学儿童欺负与人格倾向的关系.心理学报,2003,35(1):101-105.
[12] Andreou E.Bully/victim problems and their association with psychological constructs in 8 to 12-year-old Greek schoolchildren.Aggressive behavior,2000,26:49-56.
[13] Crick N R,Dodge K A.A review and reformulation of social information processing in children's social adjustment,Psychological Bulletin,1994,115:74-101.
[14] Boulton M J,Underwood K.Bully/victim problems among middle school children.British Educational Psychology,1992,62:73-87.
[15] Prinstein M J,Boergers J,Vernberg E M.Overt and relational aggression in adolescents:social psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims.Journal of Clinical Psychology,2001,30(4):479-491.
[16] Cillessen A H N,Bellmore A D.Accuracy of social self-perceptions and peer competence in middle childhood,Merrill-Palmer Quaterly,1999,45:650-676.
[17] 郭伯良,张雷.不同攻击受害类型农村儿童的社交行为和同伴关系.中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(4):260-263.
[18] 王美芳,张文新.中小学中欺负者、受欺负者与欺负-受欺负者的同伴关系.心理发展与教育,2002,2:1-5.
[19] Boulton M J,Smith P K.Bully/victim problems in middle school:stability,self-perceived competence,peer perceptions and peer acceptance.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1994,12:315-319.
[20] Grotpeter J K,Crick N R.Relational aggression,overt aggression,and friendship.Child Development,1996,67:2328-2338.
[21] Schafer M,Werner N E,Crick N R.Acomparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment:general victimization and bully/victim problem among German schoolchildren.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2002,20:281-306.
[22] Courtney M L,Cohen R,Deptula D P.An experimental analysis of children's dislike of aggressors and victims,Blackwell Publishing Ltd:Social Dvelopment,2003,12(1).
[23] Johnson D,Lewis G.Do you like what you see? Self-perceptions of adolescent bullies,British Educational Reseach Association,1999,5:665-674.
[24] Julie A H.Emotional expressionprocesses in children's peer interaction:The role of peer rejection,aggression,and gender,Child Development,2001,72(5):1426-1438.
[25] 倪凤琨.自尊与攻击行为的关系述评.心理科学进展,2005,13(1):66-71.
[26] Perry P K,PerryL C,Kennedy E.Conflict and development of antisocial behavior.In:C U Shantz,W W Hartup ed.Conflictin child and adolenscent development.New York:Combridge University Press,1992:301-329.
[27] Cillessen A H N,Bkowski W M.Haselager G J T.Stability of sociometric categories.New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,2000,88:75-79.
[28] MacDonald C D,Cohen R.Children's awareness of which peers like them and which peers dislike them.Social Development,1995,4:182-193.
[1] 赵金霞, 赵景欣, 王美芳. 留守妇女与儿童焦虑的代际传递:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 724-731.
[2] 王晖, 熊昱可, 刘霞. 亲子关系和朋友支持对流动儿童情绪和行为适应的保护作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 614-624.
[3] 谢其利, 宛蓉, 张睿, 江光荣. 歧视知觉与农村贫困大学生孤独感:核心自我评价、朋友支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 614-622.
[4] 游志麒, 张凤娟, 范翠英, 平凡, 周宗奎. 班级朋友对抑郁的影响:一项社会网络分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 339-348.
[5] 刘少英, 王芳, 朱瑶. 幼儿同伴关系发展的稳定性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 588-594.
[6] K. Urberg S. Degirmencioglu, J. Tolson, K. Halliday-Scher. 青少年同伴关系网络结构的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(2): 1-7.
[7] 庞丽娟. 同伴提名法与幼儿同伴交往研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(1): 18-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!