10～12岁儿童的同伴接纳类型与社交策略

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨10～12岁儿童同伴接纳与社交策略的关系,以儿童如何调整合作性行为来适应未来交往意愿作为社交策略的操作定义,利用最后通牒任务范式考察儿童的合作性水平,利用提名法考察同伴接纳类型与未来交往意愿。190名被试以群体施测的方式完成决策任务和问卷调查。结果表明大部分儿童在最后通牒任务中表现出公平合作的行为,女生比男生的合作性更高。被同伴接纳或拒绝的群体表现出不同的社会策略,前者合作性与未来交往意愿同向变化,后者则呈相反趋势。被同伴接纳的群体的社会策略更能有效促成交往并保护个体利益。

关键词: 同伴接纳, 合作性, 交往意愿, 最后通牒任务

Abstract: This research aimed to reveal the relationship between peer acceptance and social strategies among 10～12 years old children.The behavioral measure of social strategy is to see whether children can adjust cooperation level according to their will of future interaction.Ultimatum game was used to evaluate children's cooperation level,and 190 participants completed a survey providing their peer acceptance level and will of future interaction.Results showed that children generally exhibited cooperation in ultimatum game,while females had higher cooperation tendency than males.There were different social strategies in groups depending on peer acceptance level.Those who were accepted by others had positive correlation between cooperation and will of future interaction,while those rejected by others showed negative correlation.Strategies of those accepted by others are more effective at enhancing further interaction and protecting ones'own interest.

Key words: peer acceptance, cooperation, will of future interaction, ultimatum game

中图分类号:

B844.1

穆岩, 苏彦捷. 10～12岁儿童的同伴接纳类型与社交策略[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(2): 24-29.

MU Yan, SU Yan-jie. Relationship between Peer Acceptance and Social Strategies in 10～12 Years Old Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(2): 24-29.

参考文献

[1] 程利国,高翔.影响小学生同伴接纳因素的研究.心理发展与教育,2003,20(2):35-42.
[2] 潘佳雁.中学生同伴交往接受和拒绝的归因研究.心理科学,2002,25(1):64-68.
[3] Rubin K H, Krasnor L R. Interpersonal problem competence in children. In: V. B. Van. Hasselt and M. Herson (Eds), Handbook of Social Development: A life Perspective. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1992,133-178.
[4] Erwin P G. Friendship and Peer Relations in Children.Chichaster, Wiley, 1993
[5] 赵红梅,苏彦捷.心理理论与同伴接纳.应用心理学,2003,9(2):51-55.
[6] Coie J D, Dodge K A, Coppotelli H. Dimensions and types of social status: Across age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 1982,18.
[7] 覃玉宇,儿童同伴关系的影响因素研究述评,柳州师专学报,2003,18(3):127-130.
[8] 陈琴,庞丽娟.论儿童合作的发展与影响因素.教育理论与实践,2003,21(3):43-47.
[9] 曹中平.中班幼儿角色游戏中合作能力发展的初步观察研究.学前教育研究,1994,1:43-46.
[10] Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982,3 (4): 367-388.
[11] Thaler R H, The psychology of choice and the assumptions of economics. In: Roth A E (Ed.), Laboratory Experiments in Economics:Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerisity Press. 1987.
[12] Roth A, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, and Zamir S.Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economy Review, 1991,81 (5):1068-1095.
[13] Murnighan K, Saxon M. Scott. Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1998, 19(4):415-445.
[14] Bolton G. A comparative model of bargaining: theory and evidence. American Economy Review, 1991,81(5): 1096-1136.
[15] Kirchsteiger G. The role of envy in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1994,25(3): 373-389.
[16] Levine D. Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments.Review of Economic Dynamics, 1998, 1(3):593-622.
[17] Costa-Gomes M, Zauner K G. Ultimatum bargaining behavior in Israel, Japan, Slovenia, and the United States: A social utility analysis. Games and Economic Behavior,2001,34(2):238-269.
[18] Roth A, Erev I. Learning in extensive form games:Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term.Games and Economic Behavior, 1995,8(1): 164-212.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[3]	雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[4]	曹衍淼, 林小楠, 纪林芹, 张粤萍, 张文新. COMT基因Val158Met多态性与同伴关系对青少年抑郁的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 216-227.
[5]	李庆功, 吴素芳, 傅根跃. 儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳的关系:社会行为的中介效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 303-310.
[6]	张静, 田录梅, 张文新. 同伴拒绝与早期青少年学业成绩的关系：同伴接纳、友谊支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 353-360.
[7]	游志麒, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 田媛. 儿童同伴接纳知觉准确性及偏差与孤独感的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 524-531.
[8]	王昱文, 王振宏, 刘建君. 小学儿童自我意识情绪理解发展及其与亲社会行为、同伴接纳的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 65-70.
[9]	徐夫真, 张文新. 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的预测:同伴接纳的调节作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 274-281.
[10]	徐夫真, 张文新. 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的预测:同伴接纳的调节作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 274-281.
[11]	徐夫真, 张文新. 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的预测:同伴接纳的调节作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 274-281.
[12]	孙昕怡, 陈璟, 李红, 李秀丽. 合作指数与描述方式对儿童囚徒困境博弈中合作行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 27-33.
[13]	范丽恒, 金盛华. 教师期望对初中生心理特点的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 48-52.
[14]	潘苗苗, 苏彦捷. 幼儿情绪理解、情绪调节与其同伴接纳的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 6-13.
[15]	赵景欣, 申继亮, 张文新. 幼儿情绪理解、亲社会行为与同伴接纳之间的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 1-6.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed