图形推理任务中儿童策略获得的微观发展过程

心理发展与教育 ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 7-13.

图形推理任务中儿童策略获得的微观发展过程

沃建中, 张宏

北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875

出版日期:2004-10-15 发布日期:2004-10-15
作者简介:沃建中(1957- ),男,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授,email:jzwo@263.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(项目批准号:3973018).

A microgenetic study: Children’s Strategy Discovery in Figure Reasoning Task

WO Jian-zhong, ZHANG Hong

Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University 100875, China

Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用微观发生学设计,对30名6岁儿童在矩阵填充任务中的策略获得过程进行了研究。结果发现:从策略获得的来源看,实验处理(教育干预)是图形推理策略获得的重要来源;从策略获得的个体差异看,儿童遵循的是学习领会或半学习领会的策略获得发展方式;从策略获得的路径看,快速组儿童在达到策略获得标准后正确率不高,而标准组和延迟组则能保持较高的正确率;从策略获得的速率看,在实验前3个阶段正确率有快速的变化,而到后期则保持正确率稳定不变。

关键词: 图形推理, 策略获得, 微观发展过程

Abstract: We use the microgenetic design to examine 30 6-age-old children's acquisition of matrix completion proficiency.The results are as follows:from the source of change,experimental manipulation is a important source of strategy discovery in figure reasoning task;from the variability of change,children are followed learner model of strategy discovery;from the path of change,the main error are orientation err and size err in all three groups.In norm group and latter group,there are also other errs displayed.When the children in quick group arrive the crite-rion of strategy discovery,their accuracy would likely come down;but in other two groups,the can maintain high accuracy;from the rate of change,children in the first three sessions display rapid changes in accuracy,however, their accuracy will maintain in high level in other sessions.

Key words: figure reasoning, strategy discovery, microgenetic developmental processing

中图分类号:

B844.1

沃建中, 张宏. 图形推理任务中儿童策略获得的微观发展过程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(4): 7-13.

WO Jian-zhong, ZHANG Hong. A microgenetic study: Children’s Strategy Discovery in Figure Reasoning Task[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2004, 20(4): 7-13.

参考文献

[1] Groen G J, Parkman J M. A chronometric analysis of Simple addition, Psychological review, 1972, 79, 329-343.
[2] Ashcraft M H. The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach, Developmental review, 1982, 2, 213-236.
[3] Siegler R S. The Perils of Averaging Data Over Strategies: An Example From Children's Addition, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1987, 116, 250-264.
[4] Siegler R S, Svetina M. A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term changes, Child development, 2002, 73, 793-809.
[5] Siegler R S, Lemaire P. Older and younger adults'strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method, Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1997,126, 71-92.
[6] Shrager J, Siegler R S. SCADS: A modelof children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries, Psychological Science, 1998, 9, 405-410.
[7] Siegler R S, Crowley K. The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development, American psychologist, 46,606-620.
[8] Siegler R S. The Perils of Averaging Data Over Strategies: An Example From Children's Addition, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1987, 116, 250-264.
[9] Alibali M W. How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt? Developmental psychology, 1999, 35 (1), 127-145.
[10] Siegler R S, Elsbeth Stern. Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis, Journal of experimental psychology:General, 1998, 127, 377-397.
[11] Siegler R S. Emerging minds: The Process of change in children's thinking, New York: Oxford Press, 1996.
[12] Siegler R S. How does change occur? A microgenetic study of number conservation, Cognitive psychology, 1995, 28, 225-273.
[13] Johnson B R, Siegler R S. Learing to spell: variability,choice, and change in children's strategy use, Child development, 1999,70, 332-348.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed