心理发展与教育 ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 35-42.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

影响小学生同伴接纳因素的研究

程利国1, 高翔2   

  1. 1. 福建师范大学教科院心理系, 福州, 350007;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2003-04-15 发布日期:2003-04-15
  • 作者简介:程利国(1949- ),男,福建福州人,福建师范大学教育科学与技术学院心理系教授.

The Factor Analysis on the Influence to the Pupil’s Peer Acceptance

CHENG Li-guo1, GAO Xiang2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, FuZhou, 350007;
    2. Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875
  • Online:2003-04-15 Published:2003-04-15

摘要: 用测量表对453名小学生的社会行为、教师接纳、学业成绩、社交策略与儿童同伴接纳之间的关系进行研究.结果表明,社会行为、教师接纳、学业成绩、社交策略与同伴接纳之间存在显著相关;各变量的不同水平之间(除不适宜社交策略这一变量外)儿童同伴接纳程度存在显著差异;学业成绩、教师接纳、攻击性及提出适宜的社交策略数,对于儿童同伴接纳有较大的预测作用,但在不同性别、不同年级水平上又存在明显不同.

关键词: 同伴接纳, 社会行为, 教师接纳, 学业成绩, 社交策略

Abstract: The scale methods were used to test 453 pupils,analysing the influence of peer acceptance,examining the relations armng social behavior,teacher acceptance,academic achievement,sociopetal strategy and the children peer acceptance.Alms the author applied the regression analysis to explore the different variables to the forecasting function of children's peer acceptance.The results revealed that they existed significant correlation,but in different levels of the variables (except the variable of inappropriate strategies),the children's peer acceptance,to a great extent,existed significant difference.And the academic achievement,teacher acceptance,attack behavior and the amounts of appropriate strategies had a greatly forecasting function to the children's peer acceptance.However, there were distinct differences between the various fenders and different grade levels.

Key words: Peer Acceptance, Social Behavior, Teacher Acceptance, Academic Achievement, Sociopetal Strategy

[1] 张文新.儿童社会性发展.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999,133.
[2] 邹泓.同伴接纳、友谊与学校适应研究.心理发展与教育,1997,13(3),55-59.
[3] 陈欣银,李伯黍.中国儿童的亲子关系、社会行为及同伴接受性的研究.心理学报,1995,27(3),329-336.
[4] William F, Sharon C, Anthony L. Affective Predictors of Preschooler's Aggression and Peer Acceptance: Direct and Indirect Effects. Developmental Psychology, 2000,36(4),438-448.
[5] Elizabeth A S, Karen L B, Carole B. etal. Conduct Problem Prevention Research: the relation between behavioral problem and peer preference in different classroom context. Child Development, 1999, 70(1),169-182.
[6] 张文新.儿童社会性发展.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999,155.
[7] Kathryn R W, Cgnthia A E. Strategies for Making Friends:Relations to Social Behavior and Peer Acceptance in Early Adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 1993,29(5),819-826.
[8] Rubin K H, Krasnor L R. Interpersonal problem competence in children. In: V.B. Van. Hasselt and M. Herson (Eds), Handbook of social development: A life Perspective: New York and London: Plenum Press, 1992,133-178.
[9] Erwin P G. Friendship and Peer relations in children: Chichaster, Wiley, 1993.
[10] Miller N, Gentry K W. Sociometric indices of children's peer interaction in the school setting. In: H.C. Foot, A.J. Chapman and J.R. Smith (Eds), Friendship and Social Relations in children: Chichaster, Wiley, 1980.
[11] 陈欣银,李伯黍.中国儿童的亲子关系、社会行为及同伴接受性的研究.心理学报,1995,27(3),329-336.
[12] William F A, Sharon C, Anthony L. Affective Predictors of Preschooler's Aggression and Peer Acceptance: Direct and Indirect Effects. Developmental Psychology, 2000,36 (4), 438-448.
[13] William F A, Sharon C, Anthony L. Affective Predictors of Preschooler's Aggression and Peer Acceptance: Direct and Indirect Effects. Developmental Psychology, 2000,36(4),438-448.
[14] 周宗奎.儿童社会技能的测评方法.心理发展与教育,1996,12(3),24-29.
[15] 汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册.增订版.北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,45-52.
[16] Brochin H A, Wasik B H. Social problem solving among popular and unpopular children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1992, 20(4), 377-391.
[17] Kathryn R W, Cgnthia A E. Strategies for Making Friends:Relations to Social Behavior and Peer Acceptance in Early Adolescence.Developmental Psychology, 1993,29(5), 819-826.
[1] 章洁敏, 陶云, 杨舒涵, 陈睿. 亲社会行为的概念表征及其方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 298-304.
[2] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[3] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[4] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[5] 李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[6] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[7] 李强强, 胡佳. 时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.
[8] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[9] 王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330.
[10] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[11] 唐蕾, 刘衍玲, 杨营凯. 亲社会行为的认知过程及脑神经基础[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 437-446.
[12] 马利, 王滔. 残疾儿童心理健康对家长亲职压力的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 126-133.
[13] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[14] 夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 344-352.
[15] 姜振丽, 张明浩. 反社会行为的遗传基础:基因多态性和DNA甲基化[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 275-287.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!